Laserfiche WebLink
June 24, lg88 <br /> <br /> Accordingly, I have directed that the Health Department take the necessary steps to <br />abate this public health nuisance." <br /> <br /> Rufus McRae, <br />that he disagreed <br />willifiB to work <br /> <br />1217 Coltrante Drive, pyekented pictures taken from the area and stated <br />with the Health Department as being labeled 'property unsanitary' and was <br />together to take care of the problem. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Gray, the report to be received as information <br />and that the Health Department to work with M~. McRae to solve the problem, and was adppted <br />by unanimous vote. <br /> <br />The City Manager presented the following reports: <br /> <br /> 80J2~0-- ,,Consideration of a resolution autho~i~zing the issuance of $1,938,--3 of bonds <br />of-the. City-of Portsmouth, Virginia, to be known as General Obligation Public Improvement <br />Bonds for the purpose of providing funds to pay the cost of various improvement projects <br />of the City of Portsmouth. <br /> <br /> This resolution is a re-authorization of bonds that were previously approved by City <br />Council for the projects shown on the attached sheet. Based on the information that we have <br />received from the City's bond attorney, a re-authorization of the entire bond amount mmmt <br />be adopted to reinstitute legal basis for bond anticipation notes. This action does not in- <br />crease ~he City's general obligation for bond authorization. It onl) re-establishes the 1.9 <br />million dollars as of this date and supersedes the previous resolution. The City Manager <br />recommends adoption." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Oast and seconded by Mr. Gray, the following resolution was adopted, <br />and by the following vote: <br /> <br />"A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $1,938,773. OF BONDS OF THE CITY OF <br />PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, TO BE KNOWN AS GENERAl OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT <br />BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDS TO PAY THE COST OF VARIOUS IMPROVE- <br />MENT PROJECTS OF THE CITY. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City of Portsmouth to provide funds for the projects <br />as hereinafter set forth; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, there are no funds in the treasury of ~he City of Portsmouth applicable to <br />the payment o'f said expenses and the cost of said projects and it is, accordingly, necessary <br />to issue General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds of the City o£ Portsmouth in the sum <br />oF One Million, Nine Hundred Thirty~ight Thousand, Seven Hundred Seventy-three Dollars <br />($1,938,773.) for those purposes. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia: <br /> <br /> (1) For the purposes of urban renewal, parks and recreation, public safety, public <br />transportation, purchase of property, drainage and street improvements, community services <br />and waterfront development, it shall be issued One Million, Nine Hundred Thirty~ight <br />Thousand, Seven Hundred Seventy-three Dollars ($1,938,773.) ~£ bonds of the City of Portsmout <br />to be known as General Obligation Public Improvem~n~t Bbn~s pursnant to the provisions of <br />Chapter 5 of Title 15.1 of the Code of Virginia, 19S0, as amended, and provisions of law <br />applicable thereto. The said bonds shall be serial bonds and shall~be issued at one time <br />and shall be in such form and of such denomination as the Council shall direct. Each issue <br />shall be payable not exceeding forty (40) years from its date, and said bonds shall bear <br />interest at a rate or rates to be hereinafter determined by the Council upo~ the sale of <br />said bonds, providing that the maximum rate of interest shall not exceed the maximum rate <br />of interest authorized by law at the time of the sale of said bonds. <br /> <br />(2) This resolution shall take effect ~rom the date of its adoption." <br /> <br />Ayes: Bar~es, Beamer, Early, Gray, Holley, Oast, Davis <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />80-221 "Consideration of a~ ordinance to close a port~on of Fairfax Avenue. <br /> <br /> E.L. Copeland, et.al., has made application to close a port~on of Fairfax A~enue between <br />Parker Avenue and Walnut Street. Viewers were appointed on May 15, 1980 in accordance with <br />state law and a copy of their report and a map showing the portion to be closed is attached <br />for your information. The City Manager recommends ~dgption." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Early and seconded by Mr. Gray, the following~ordinance was adopted on <br />first and finaI reading, and by the following vote: <br /> <br />"AN ORDINANCE CLOSING A PORTION OF FAIRFAX AVENUE." <br /> <br />Ayes: Barnes, Beamer, E~rly, <br />Nays: None <br /> <br /> of a resolntion <br /> <br /> 80-222 "Consideration <br />RuTter Street.. <br /> <br />Gray, Holley, Oast, Davis <br /> <br />appointing viewers for closing a portion of <br /> <br /> Curtis Coan has petitioned the City for <br />tween Peninsula Avenue and Columbia 'Street. <br />with s~ate law. The City Manager recommends <br /> <br />the closing of a portion of~Rutter Street be- <br />This resolution appo.ints viewers in accordance <br />adoption.' <br /> <br /> <br />