Laserfiche WebLink
June 24, 1980 <br /> <br />to food processing; <br /> <br /> (c) Only such offices as are reasonably necessary for plant administration shall <br />be located on the premises; <br /> <br /> (d) Cold storage and dry storage as may be reasonably necessary to the food <br />processing function may be created within and adjacent to the existing structure; <br /> <br /> (e) Two (2) signs are authorized consisting of non-illuminated letters projected <br />not to exceed a foot from the plane of the white brick building wall facing Elmhurst Lane. <br />One sign to contain the corporate logo Gwaltney and the other an identifer Portsmouth <br />Plant, such signs not exceeding sixty sq~--f~et (60) each. <br /> <br /> (f) Vehicular traffic generated by the food processing plant shall enter and <br />leave the premises exclusively by Elmhurst Lane." <br /> <br />Ayes: Barnes, Beamer, Early, Gray, Holley, Oast, Davis <br />Nays: None <br /> <br /> 80-184 The following report submitted by the City Manager~conc~rning business license <br />tax rates for gasoline retailers: <br /> <br /> "At the Council meeting held May 27, 1980, the Council requested that I furnish additiona <br />information concerning business license tax rates for gasoline retailers. A copy of my pre- <br />vious report to you, which con~&ins my recommendation on this matter, is attached for your <br />convenience; and the following additional information is provided pursuant to your instruc- <br />tions. <br /> <br /> The following price information was provided by the'Virginia Gasoline Retailers Associa- <br />tion: <br /> <br /> Wholesale Price Percent No-Growth <br />Date Per Gallon Change Tax Rate <br /> <br />December 1978 46.-~ <br />December 1979 79.3~ 68.8% 18¢ <br /> <br />Based on the above data, the current <br />to 18~ per $100 to completely offset <br />the 69.8 percent increase. <br /> <br />30e per $100 rate would need to be adjusted downward <br />the increase in business license cost resulting from <br /> <br /> Below is shown the impact varying rate reductions would have in terms of how much of <br />a price increase would be offset by a tax rate reduction: <br /> <br />Cents per $100 Resulting Rate Level of Price Increase <br /> Reduction per $100 Which Would h'e Offset <br /> <br />5e 25¢ 20% <br />10c 20~ 80% <br />15c 15¢ 100%" <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Oast, thebreport to be received as information <br />and the matter to be referred to the new Council; a'letter to be forwarded to the Virginia <br />Gasoline Retailers advising of action~taken, and was addpted by_unanimous vote. <br /> <br /> 80-212 The following report submitted by the City Manager concerning complaint of <br />rats at 121- Coltrane Drive: <br /> <br /> "At the June 10, 1980 City Council meeting, a complaint from Mr. Rufus McRae was <br />referred to my office for investigation and report back to City Council. Mr. McRae reported <br />that he had a problem with rats in his yard, and the Public Health Department had not pro- <br />vided assistance to him. <br /> <br /> The Health Department's 'Record of Com~taintU'~evealed that a telephone call was <br />received from Mr. McRae on June 3, 1980 regarding rats in his yard. Two sanitarians visited <br />Mr. McRae's home that same day, and discussed the problem with him, including measures which <br />he must take to alleviate conditions which provided harborage for the rats. <br /> <br /> On June 6, 1980 a sanitarian revisited Mr McRae's home, and noted that no action had <br />been taken by the owner to clean up the property. Specific unsanitary conditions cited <br />include 1) debris sitting on the ground, 2) old shed and dog house, and 3) water, dog food, <br />and droppings in the yard. On this same day, information concerning rodent control measures <br />was shared with the five neighbors surrounding Mr. McRae's home. <br /> <br /> On June.10, 1980 prior to the City Council meeting, a <br />daughter and again provided written and oral instruci~ons. <br />sanitarian wuld return in 14 days for abatement. <br /> <br />sanitarian talked with Mr. McRae's <br />Notation was made that the <br /> <br /> Following a call from my office, two sanitarians visited Mr. McRae's home £or the <br />fourth time to discuss with him, and at Mr. Wakins' request, took pictures of the situation. <br />Based on discussions with surrounding propertycowners, the significant problem experienced <br />by Mr. McRae has not spread to these owners. However, as indicated by~the pictures, Mr. <br />McRae's yard constitutes a definite public health nuzsance, which if no~ abated will con- <br />tribute to rat infestation of the surrounding properties. <br /> <br /> <br />