Laserfiche WebLink
299 <br /> <br />June 23, 1981 <br /> <br /> (3) this use permit is approved <br />attached correspondence dated June 19, <br />to G. Robert House, Jr., City Manager, <br />one." <br /> <br />subject to the fo.llowing conditions contained in the <br />1981 from James M. Bray, Acting Planning Director <br />said correspondence having been designated as attachme~ <br /> <br />Ayes: Barnes, Beamer, Gray, Webb, WhitloW, Johansen <br />Nays: None <br /> <br /> 81-1'84(~) Resolution approving the Redevelopmen~ Plan and the feasibility <br />for the Hattonsvilte Redevelopment Project, deferred from the regular meeting of <br />was presented. <br /> <br />of relocatioi <br />June 9, 1981 <br /> <br /> Michael A. Kay, Executive Director, PRHA, P. O. Box 1095, requested that the matter to <br />be deferred for an additional two weeks to enable the Housing Authority staff and City staff, <br />and Council, if so desi.re, to have additional meeting with the Hattonsville Civic League prio~ <br />to bringing back a formal recommendation. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mrs. Webb and seconded by Mr. Whitlow, that the matter be deferred until next <br />regulaz meeting, July 14, 1981, and was adopted by unanimous vote. <br /> <br /> The following cmtizens spoke concerning 81-184(c). <br /> <br /> ,~o~g~h~p>.v.~asnes, 300 Park Road, representing Portsmonth Port ~ Industrial Commission, <br />~t~ted that the PPIC approved of the entire area of Hattsonville, as proposed, be approved. <br /> <br /> B. L. Cherry, 4520 Wake Forest Road, representing the Industrial Development Authority, <br />spoke in support of the rezoning of Hattonsville area as proposed. <br /> <br /> Jim Dunn, 4513 Templar Drive, representing Portsmouth Chamber of Commerce, requested tha~ <br />the Hattonsvllle Project be approved as proposed. <br /> <br /> Durvin Cromwell, 2820 Hyman Street, representing Hat~tonsville Civic League, requested <br />that consideration be given to leave the section between Laigh Road and Ponderosa Street as <br />residential. <br /> <br /> Joseph E. Knight, 4820 Portsmouth Boulevard, spoke against Hattonsvitle being rezoned <br />as industrial and residents having to be relocated. <br /> <br /> Cetha E. Boone, Sr., 2727 Ballard Avenue, representing Hattonsvil]e Civic League, <br />stated that the Hattonsville Project involves human beings, and that consideration be given <br />as to relocation of the citizens in the area. <br /> <br /> Sylvester Brown, 1909 Laigh Road, President, Hattonsville Civic League, spoke of <br />establ:~km~.~ not operating mn the Hattonsville area, and stated that the Housing Authority <br />is not ~i's~e~ngto the residents in the area and requested that the citizens be able to remain <br />in the area. <br /> <br /> 81-184(d) Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the Southsids <br />Plan for the Southside IV Redevelopment Project was presented. <br /> <br />The following citizens spoke: <br /> <br />IV Redevelopment <br /> <br /> George D. Eastes, 300 Park Road, representing Portsmouth Port & Industrial Commission, <br />requested that consideration be given to go ahead w~th Southside IV as proposed. <br /> <br /> B. L, Cherry, 4520 Wake Forest Road, representing the Industrial Development Authority, <br />spoke in support of the Southside IV Redevelopment Plan as proposed. <br /> <br /> Jim Dunn,. 4514 Templar Drive, representing Portsmouth Chamber of Commerce, spok~ in <br />support of ~He Southside IV Redevelopment Plan. <br /> <br /> John H. Hardy, 4644 River Shore Road, representing J. H, Hardy, Inc., asked that con- <br />sideration be given on the parking lot that he is operating in Southside as he would like <br />remain in the area. <br /> <br />to <br /> <br /> Nathalia Johnson, 310 Nelson Street, spoke for the concerms of the residents who still <br />remain in Southside - parking is a problem and health conditions deterimental. <br /> <br /> On motion of Mrs. Webb and seconded by Mr. Whitlow, the following resolution was adopted <br />and by the following vote: <br /> <br />"A RESOLUTION A~'PROV~NG AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SOUTHSIDE IV REDEVHLOPMENT PLAN <br />FOR TH~ SOUTHSIDE IV REDEVELOPMHNT PROJECT. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council by resolution adopted May 9, 1978, approved a Redevelopment Plan <br />for the Southside IV Redevelopment Project, Portsmouth, Virginia; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, there has been presented to this body for consideration and approval, <br />of an amended Redevelopment Plan for the project area, dated June, 1981 which plan <br />of 12 pages and 2 exhibits; and ' <br /> <br />a copy <br />consists <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 proposes uo add certain property to the project area; and <br /> <br /> <br />