|
June 14, 1983
<br />
<br />'(c) cA 83-5
<br />
<br />PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ~HE CITY CODE: ro read as follows: Section 40-95(b
<br />Commission of Architectural Review. Code amendment to include representa-
<br />tion of the Port Norfolk Historic District on the Commission of Architec-
<br />tural Review while keeping the membership to seven (7) members.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mrs. Webb and seconded by Mr. Barnes, to
<br />the Planning Commission, CA 83-5 to amend Section 40-95(b),
<br />was adopted by unanimous vote.
<br />
<br />co~cur in the recommendation of
<br />was approved on first reading,
<br />
<br />and
<br />
<br /> (d) CA 83-6 - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CODE: To read as follows: Section ~0-102.
<br /> Historic District and subdistricts; building regulations. Eode amendment
<br /> to specify uses and building regulations which will apply to the defined
<br /> Port Norfolk Historic Limited Business District.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mrs. Webb, to. concur in the recommendation of the
<br />Planning Commission.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mrs. Webb and seconded by Mr. Gray, to,amend CA~83'-5
<br />19%57 (~rgdeCk, Histo~ic ~i~triet~~, under Section 40-102(1)(2), and
<br />vote.
<br />
<br />~e.-wead ~'Feh~uary,%0.~
<br />was adopted by unanimous
<br />
<br /> On motion CA 83-6 to be approved on first reading, as amended, and was adopted by unani-
<br />mous vote.
<br />
<br /> (e) CA 83-7 PROPOSED ~MENDMENT TO TNB CITY CODE: To read as follows: Section 40-102
<br />~ "/~ ''/~a)~Special'excep~ons'fo~nonconfornzzng'us~s; ho~ granted~,~odearaendment ~e~.wai~er~
<br /> provisions for existing nonconforming uses.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mrs. Webb, to concur in the recommendation of the
<br />Planning Commission.
<br />
<br />Substitute motion of Mr. Holley and seconded by Mr. Barnes, that CA 83-- be referred
<br />to the Commission of Architectural Review, and was adopted by unanimous vote.
<br />
<br />UNFI, NISHED BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> 83-202 The following ordinance approved on first reading at the regular meeting of
<br />May 24, 1983, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $103,265 FROM THE GRANTS FUND FOR THE ANNUAL
<br />SUMMER LUNCH PROGRAM."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Gray, the ordinance was adopted, and by the
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes; Barnes, Gray, Holley, Webb, Beamer
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 83~203 The following ordinance approved on first reading at the regular meeting of
<br />May 24, 1983, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $39,250 FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR
<br />IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ELM AVENUE NEISHBORHOOD FACILITY."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mrs. Webb and seconded by Mr. Gray, the ordinance was adopted, and by the
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Gray, Holley, Webb, Beamer
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 83-204 The following ordinance approved on first reading at the regular meeting of
<br />May 24, 1983, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $60,053 FROM THE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FUND FOR
<br />THE HOLIDAY HOUSE INTERMEDIATE CARE FACILITY FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mrs. Webb, the ordinance was adoFted, and by the
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Gray, 8olley, lfebb, Beamer
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 82-355 Letter from the City Manager recommending adoptions, of Cox Cable rate increase,
<br />which~ilI also include the copyright fee imposed by the Copyright Federal Tribunal.
<br />
<br /> "Attached is a letter from the Chairman of the Cable Television Commission recommending
<br />final approval of Cox Cable's interim rate increase and approval of an additional $.29 in-
<br />crease due to changes in copyright royalty fees. Staff analysis indicates that Cox has at-
<br />· emp~t~ in good faith to meet the criteria establ~is.hed by the City when the interim increase
<br />was granted. Although there is certainly room for~more improvement~ I believe that Cox's
<br />level of service has improv6d since
<br />
<br /> In addition, the copyright rbyalty issue has been resolved to my satisfaction with Cox's
<br />ta~es~ proposal, a copy of which is attached. Therefore, I would concur in the recommendation
<br />of the Cable Television Commission, subject to Cox's dronping its suit against the City of
<br />Portsmouth. ~
<br />
<br />i)
<br />
<br />
<br />
|