Laserfiche WebLink
November 12, 1985 <br /> <br />Contract Price (Western <br />Contract Administration <br />Contingencies <br /> <br />Waterproofing) <br />and Inspection <br /> <br />$169,521.00 <br /> 15,000.00 <br /> 10,000.00 <br /> <br />TOTAL COST $194,521.00 <br /> <br /> The Director of Planning, Engineerzng and Inspections recommends appropriation of the <br />necessary funds and award of the contract. I, therefore, recommend City Council's approval." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mrs. Lucas and seconded by Mr. Beamer, the following ordinance was approved <br />on first reading, and was adopted by unanimous vote: <br /> <br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $194,521 FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR REPAIRS <br />TO THE UPPER DECK OF EDINBURGH SQUARE PARKING GARAGE." <br /> <br /> 85-343 Letter from the City Manager recomending adoption of an ordinance to appropriate <br />$100,000 from the Capital Improvement Program to upgrade and improve 20-year (Flus] traffic <br />signals with modern equipment. <br /> <br /> "An important component to the City's Master Street and Highway Plan is a modern traffic <br />signal system. Since my arrival I have recommended, and you have agreed, to implement a pro- <br />gram to replace all twenty-year (plus) traffic signal systems Within the City. Over the past <br />twelve months, 14 new t~affic signal controllers were purchase, 10 installed with the majority <br />being on High Street between Willett Drive and Tyre Neck Road (see attached list.. From com- <br />ments received, traffic flow and coordination have improved greatly as a result of the new <br />signals. <br /> <br /> In the 1985./86 Capital Improvement Program is $100,000 to continue our replacement progra <br />This year's program would purchase twelve additional traffic signal controllers with the major- <br />ity replacing existing systems along Portsmouth Boulevard ~see attached list for new locations- <br /> <br /> The Director of Planning, Engineering and Inspections has indicated there is a six-to-eigt <br />month lead time from receiFt of equipment to time of purchase. Once received, it will take <br />another six months to program equipment, consstruct foundations and install controllers. The <br />Director of Planning, Engineering and Inspection shas recommended the appropriation of ~unds t( <br />purchase the equpoment needed. <br /> <br /> I, therefore, concur with staff's request and recommend Council's appropriation of <br />$100,000 from the Capita] Improvement Plan. <br /> <br /> On morion of Mr. Beamer and seconded by Mrs. Webb, the following ordinance was approved <br />on first reading, and was adopted by unanimous vote: <br /> <br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $100,000 FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TO REPLACE <br />AND IMPROVE TKAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT," <br /> <br /> 85-344 Letter from the City Manager recommending denial of an ordinance to close a <br />portion of Amelia Avenue. <br /> <br /> "Application has been made to close a portion of Amelia Avenue between Clifford Street <br />and Griffin Street. Both the Planning Commission and the v~ewers report have recommended <br />approval of this request. <br /> <br /> However, as I have indicated to you in the five year capita] improvement Flat, the com- <br />pletion of the unimproved sections of Clifford Street from City Park to Airline Boulevard is <br />an integral part of the City Park development plans. In connection with this, the intersectin <br />streets such as Amelia Avenue may also become important factors in the traffic plan. <br /> <br /> Therefore, I recommend denial of the ordinance on your agenda tonight pertaining to Ameli <br />Avenue. If, in the future, Amelia Avenue does not become part of the necessary traffic patteri <br />another application could be considered." <br /> <br /> Gordon Tayloe, Attorney, Central Fidelity Bank Building, representing Charles D. Johnson, <br />applicant, spoke in support of the application. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mrs. Lucas, that the matter be deferred and Mr. Tayloe <br />meet with the City Manager to discuss his proposal as presented tonight, and was adopted by <br />unanimous vote. ~Deferred to the meeting of January 14, 1986.) <br /> <br /> 85=345 Letter from the City <br />the City Manager to execute a deed <br />for the Lake Meade Reservoir. <br /> <br />Manager recommending adcption of a resolution authorizing <br />of exchange to provide additional land to serve as a buffer <br /> <br /> "Mr. Jesse L. Williams, Jr. who owns property in the City of Suffolk has requested an <br />e×chanage of property adjacent to the Lake Meade Reservoir so that an erosion control dam coulc <br />be constructed. Mr: Williams has indicated that he would incur the expenses of such a dam. <br /> <br /> The City's Director o£ Public Utilities, Mr. Jim Spacek, has indicated that construction <br />of the dam would be beneficial to the City as well as to Mr. Williams by preventing additional <br />run-off and build up of silt in the City's reservoir. The exchange of proFerty will also pro- <br />vide additional land for the City of Portsmouth to serve as a buffer for the lake. Attached <br />is a map identifying the property in question. Since the property is located within corporate <br />boundaries of the City of Suffolk, I contracted Suffolk City Manager John L. Rowe, Jr., and he <br />has indicated that he has no objection to Mr. Williams' proposal. <br /> <br /> <br />