Laserfiche WebLink
270 <br /> <br />March 11, 1986 <br /> <br />Patrick J. Coffield, Assistant City Manager, addressed Mr. Harsley's concerns. <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mrs. Lucas, the ordinance was adopted on final <br />reading by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Beamer, Corprew, Gray, Lucas, Whitlow, Holley <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />REPORTS FROM THE CITY MANAGER - <br /> <br /> 86-71 <br />$67,000 from <br />and award of <br /> <br />Letter from <br />the Capital <br />contract. <br /> <br />the City Manager recommending adontion of an ordinance to appropriate <br />ImprovementPrcgram for completion of the revised design for City Park~ <br /> <br /> "As per the City Council's request of November 7, 1985, the master plan for City Park <br />was reevaluated to shift the existing boat ramp and proposed parking accommodations to the <br />eastern side of the park as shown on the overlays to the original plan. <br /> <br /> Relocation of the bcat ramp will involve a design of the new facility, the original cost <br />of which was borne by the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. It will also involve <br />design of a larger portion of the park, much of which had reached the 90% completion stage. <br />The additional cost to redesign the park, as proposed, is estimated ~by the consultant not to <br />exceed $67,000. The actual cost will depend on the effect the relocation has on the various <br />components of the previous design for the park as determined by the final design. The design <br />· s also based on the assumption that a favorable review will be received from the Army Corps <br />of Engineers and the Virginia Marine Resources Commission. The consultant has estimated the <br />total cost of the revised plan at $3,400,000 with the Phase I cost estimated at $2,034,000. <br />The attached also represents the antic2pated time schedule assuming your approval to proceed <br />with this plan. <br /> <br /> If the Council is ~n agreement with carryin~ our the plans as presented, I recommend <br />approval be given to extend the design contract with the firm of Langley and McDonald and <br />appropriation of an additional $67,000 to complete the revised design." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. ~itlow and seconded by Mr. Beamer, the following ordinance was approved <br />on first reading; award of contract to Langley and McDonald, as requested, and was adopted <br />by unanimous vote: <br /> <br />"AN )RDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $67,000.00 FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR <br />ENGINEERING AND DESIGN WORK FOR C[TY PARK. <br /> <br /> 86-72 Letter from the City Manager recommending adoption of <br />$83,000 from the Public Utilities Capital Improvements Program for <br />merits at the City's Godwin Street Water Booster Pumping Station. <br /> <br />an ordinance to appropriate <br />design of certain imnrove- <br /> <br /> "The study of the Naval Shipyard's Solid Waste Disposal/Steam Plant water demand on the <br />City!s system is complete. Conducted bT an engineering consultant under contract to Pcrtsmout <br />and paid for by the Navy, this evaluation recommends the Navy fund the design and construction <br />of certain improvements at the City's Godwin Street Water Booster Pumping Station. <br /> <br /> The Navy concurs with this evaluation and in a February 18, 1986 letter expresses their <br />intent to fund the improvements and their desire to proceed with this project as soon as <br />possible to forestall delaying their Waste Disposal Steam Plant Project. <br /> <br /> The Director of Public Utilities has recommended that the Navy's recurred work be include <br />with already City planned work a~ Godwin Street ~FY 85-86 CIP Project 901] to form one project <br />I concur in this recommendation. I reques~ that $82,896.00 be appropriated For the design <br />($23,647 Navy share and $59,24[ City share) and that I be authorized ~o execute and design <br />task order with CH2M-Hill under our existing contract and execute a contract with the Navy for <br />their reimbursable share. <br /> <br /> After design and bidding, I will present a similar action prior to award of the actual <br />construction contract. <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Beamer and seconded by Mr. ~ray, the following ordinance was approved on <br />first reading; and authorization be granted, as requested, and was adopted by unanimous vote: <br /> <br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $83,000.00 FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT <br />FUND FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN FOR UPGRADING OF THE GODWIN STREET WATER BOOSTER <br />PUMPING STATION." <br /> <br />86-73 - Letter from t~e city Manager recovme~ng ad6ption of a resolution to approve: <br /> <br />(a) Amendment No. <br /> Project. <br /> Amendment No. 15 to the <br /> Project. <br />(c) A conservation plan for <br />(d) A conservation plan for <br />(e) A conservation pl~an for <br />(f) A conservation plan for <br />(g) A conservation plan for <br />(h) A conservation plan for <br /> <br />1 to the Twin Pines Redevelopment Plan for the Twin Pines Redevelopmen <br /> Crawford Redevelopment Plan for the Crawford Urban Renewal <br /> <br />the Ebony Heiehts Conservation Project. <br />the East Park View Conservation Project. <br />the Port Norfolk Conservation Project. <br />the Brighton Conservation Project. <br />the Prentis Park Conservation Project. <br />the West Park View Conservation Project. <br /> <br /> <br />