Laserfiche WebLink
April 25, 2017 <br /> <br />“ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF THE OVERALL AND FOURTH <br />QUARTER FY 2017 PORTSMOUTH PUBLIC SCHOOLS GENERAL FUND <br />OPERATING BUDGETS BY TRANSFERRING $200,000 FROM THE <br />ADMINISTRATION CLASSIFICATION TO THE PUPIL TRANSPORTATION <br />CLASSIFICATION AND TRANSFERRING $50,000 FROM THE ADMINISTRATION <br />CLASSIFICATION TO THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATION.” <br /> <br /> <br />Ayes: Cherry, Clark, Lucas-Burke, Moody, Psimas, Whitaker, Rowe <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />17 - 189 - Adoption of a resolution authorizing the Department of Public Utilities to <br />approve change orders totaling more than 25% of the construction contract with <br />SHAW Construction, Corp. for the Goose Creek Transmission Main Replacement <br />Project. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br /> <br /> The city completed the Transmission Main Study in September 2013 to guide in <br />the long-term sustainability and reliability of the city’s water transmission system utilizing <br />a risk versus consequence of failure evaluation process. Replacement of the aerial <br />stream crossing at Goose Creek was identified as critical project with a high level of both <br />risk and consequence of failure. <br /> <br /> There are three transmission mains crossing Goose Creek that transport water <br />from the Lake Kilby Treatment Plant is Suffolk to downtown Portsmouth. Two of these <br />mains are 20” cast iron pipes (placed in service in 1888 & 1906). The third main is a 30” <br />concrete pipe (placed in service in 1938). <br /> <br /> The concrete transmission main currently transports 65% (average day basis) of <br />the water produced by Portsmouth’s Lake Kilby Water Treatment Plant to the “In-Town” <br />area of Portsmouth. <br /> <br /> Public Utilities operational staff observed several significant leaks on the 30-inch <br />concrete pipe. Failure of this pipe would severely restrict the ability of Public Utilities to <br />provide potable water and fire suppression to the “in-town” area of Portsmouth and to <br />fulfill contractual obligations for bulk water sales to the city of Chesapeake. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br /> Due to the concern of imminent failure of the concrete main, a decision was made <br />to prepare a solicitation for the complete replacement of all three transmission mains. <br />Kimley Horn prepared bid specifications and site plans for the bid process. 20% plans <br />were developed using aerial imagery, GIS and schematic drawings from 1938 and those <br />plans were included in the bid specifications. <br /> <br /> The original contract amount was for $1,449,249.00 and was awarded to SHAW <br />Construction. The contract was for the replacement of all three finished water <br />transmission lines with two, 30-inch HDPE transmission mains. Installation of the new <br />transmission lines requires horizontal directional drill methods to minimize the impact to <br />the CSX Railroad, Goose Creek and surrounding wetlands. <br /> <br /> Additional surveying and field exploration completed after award, but before <br />commencement of work, resulted in necessary adjustments to the horizontal and vertical <br />alignment of the proposed transmission mains. Over 90% of the cost increase is <br />associated with the purchase of necessary material items not included in the original bid <br />specifications. <br /> <br /> <br /> Section 12-183 of the City Code requires that any change orders that will exceed <br />25% of a contract’s cost must be approved by City Council. <br /> <br />Financial Impact: <br /> <br /> Approval of the Resolution and subsequent change orders will add approximately <br /> <br />$979,000 in additional expense to this project. <br /> <br /> The anticipated final cost for this project is $2,427,864.39. While this is <br />approximately 67% greater than the original contract, approximately $903,000 of the <br />$979,000 is for material costs not included in the 20% bid documents. The next lowest <br /> <br />bid was $2,256,000 and would have required a similar change in material costs. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />