Laserfiche WebLink
<br />June 14. 2011 <br /> <br />11 - 235 - Adoption of an ordinance to de-obligate $56,964 of unexpended <br />appropriation authority in closed Public Utility Capital Improvement Program <br />(PUCIP) projects, to reprogram $265,680 of revenue and appropriation authority in <br />various active and closed PUCIP projects, to reprogram $13,724,462 of bond <br />proceeds to cover expenses and obligations in active PUCIP projects, to <br />appropriate $4,183,511 of interest earnings from bond proceeds and $1,832,720 <br />of Series 2010 Bond Proceeds to various PUCIP projects, and to appropriate <br />$62,126.40 of Cost of Issuance funds related to the Series 2010 General <br />Obligation Bonds for bond counsel fees, advisory fees and other related costs. <br />Vision Principle: Thriving Neighborhoods and a Sense of Community. <br /> <br />Background: <br />. Appropriation authority for CIP projects is made on an annual basis but the CIP is <br />a multi-year fund. CIP Projects may span two to five years or more. <br />. Variances may occur between authorized contract price, actual final contract <br />price, and budgeted amounts for projects in the CIP. These differences result in <br />variances between budgeted and actual expenditures but only to the extent that actual <br />is less than budgeted, not vice-versa. <br />. Projects and appropriation authority were approved by City Council for FY2008 <br />and FY2009; however, the City did not issue bonds in those years largely as a result of <br />economic conditions caused by the Great Recession. As a result of the delay and <br />changes in project funding priorities, funding sources do not match one-for-one with <br />certain approved projects. <br />. Project priorities changed after adoption of the CIP in subsequent years, which <br />has created the need to reallocate funding resources. For example, receipt of ARRA <br />grant funds for the Prentis Park project caused us to construct and complete the entire <br />project at one time even though it was initially planned to occur over several years in the <br />CIP. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />. De-obligating unexpended appropriation authority (example unexpended bond <br />proceeds in closed projects) will help fund existing completed projects waiting to be <br />closed in the financial system. Further, the action will also make for simplified financial <br />reporting. <br />. Reprogramming revenue and appropriation authority will fund completed projects <br />and projects under construction where the funding source was unrealized. <br />. Reprogramming of available bond proceeds and unallocated bond funds will fund <br />projects with revenue shortfalls. Again, the reprogramming is required to properly <br />match revenues with expenses; no additional appropriation authority is needed or <br />requested. <br />. Interest earned on bonds issued for CIP projects would be utilized to fund <br />shortfalls in completed and active projects. The appropriate use of these interest <br />earnings is to fund CIP projects. <br />. The Cost of Issuance allocated is $62,126.40 to the Public Utility Fund. <br />. Bond proceeds are invested with the Virginia State Non-Arbitrage Program <br />account and are usually drawn-down on a quarterly basis as expenditures are made. <br />. Future bond issues will replenish reprogrammed revenues as result of the <br />appropriations of this ordinance to fund remaining approved projects in the CIP that are <br />planned for FY12 through FY16. <br /> <br />Financial impact: <br />. No additional funding required. <br /> <br />Recommended Action: <br />. Adoption of the ordinance. Vision Principle: Thriving Neighborhoods and a Sense <br />of Community. <br />