Laserfiche WebLink
January 23, 1990 <br /> <br /> Smithfield Foods is a sign~ificant- <br />D~l~dwide reputation and ~cont~ibutes. <br /> Hampton Roads area .and insures <br /> )l~ce among 'economic ~i~lead~ers; and~ ~ J ~ <br /> <br /> the lo~al, ~egi~ona~, and State~ s~ <br /> tries such as- Smithfield Foods <br /> ; and ~ <br /> <br />V;irgin~a industr, <br />:he economic <br />Virginia ' s <br /> <br />~ ~ o~y e benefite< <br />?arid and in <br /> <br />REAS, it is acknowledged that economic <br /> quality can compliment each othez <br />odds with ~one .~noth~r, and, that <br /> gard ~fo~ ~the~ environment ,~ ~pa <br /> Bay and it~3t~ibutaries; and <br /> <br /> the Sta%e Water Control Beard <br /> will create a' major economic harris <br /> which may re~su~t-in the loss of <br /> y and the ~State, ~as well ~as the <br />~yment opportunities. <br /> <br /> ~=velo and <br />as opp¢ ~ed to <br />~ic ex be <br /> ly in the <br /> <br />:op~ed ~ermit <br />~ip on [e <br />in <br />~s. _~f- isting and <br /> <br />, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the COU <br />th, ~irginia~ ~tna~ ~he ~ommon~eS~th, oif' <br />~ to review the economic impact of the <br />ewater discharge requirements. <br /> <br />IT FURTHER RESOLVED$[:th~t the aPP~opris <br />a'lth of Virginia, ~e~ew~'this situa-tion <br />[~S~which can accommodate both~:eco~omi <br />as well as environmental consideratio <br />Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. <br /> <br /> ~,!Barnes, Gorpr~,: Gray, Hawks, SimP <br /> <br /> Letter fro~ ~he City Manager recommen <br /> authorize the City Manager to execute <br /> for the sale of surplus bulk water to <br /> <br />,y~u are awa'~e~'a~d~ave~been b'~efed ~ <br />~f Portsmou%h a~d Chesapeake ~ve!be <br />concernfng a contract for ~the purc <br />e~ by the City of~Chesapeake:from the C <br />)leased to inf0rm you~that a prope~sed <br />the negot±at~ng ~eam Of the~two~ci% <br />ation by their respective City Councils <br />are scheduled to consider the approval <br /> <br /> he City of <br />~i~gini~. be <br />Lmpleme~tation of <br /> <br />:e ~agen¢ies of the <br />and, r~asonab~e <br />~ :s~abi~ ity and <br />~s,~hi(h would <br /> <br /> b <br /> <br /> ~tion of a <br /> ~osed <br /> [ke . <br /> <br /> to time, <br /> cting <br /> surplus <br /> ortsmouth. <br /> mt has bee] <br /> <br /> City <br /> proposed <br /> ld January <br /> <br />5on; We~ <br /> <br />~ing ad( <br /> the pre <br /> Chesap~ <br /> <br />Dm ~t ime <br />~n condl <br />~ase of <br />[ty of t <br />ag reem~ <br />ies for <br />~ <- Both <br />of this <br /> <br />t~at their respectiv~e CounCiI.Meehing.s~to~ be h~ <br /> <br />hereto is a~summary of what I fee <br />f~the agreement. ~I would,like to empha <br />solely for the sale of surplus wat <br />any of the capital assets of Portsmouth <br />i~'the sale o~ waterito :Chesapeake pUrs~ <br />)osed agreeme~t~wi~l'~ot~impair Po~ts~e <br />to our own~citizens~ The maximum <br /> <br /> are t~e main <br />~ize - that this <br />~r, and not for th~ <br />s wate] system. <br />~nt to ~he terms <br />th's al,ility to <br />quanti~y of bulk <br /> <br />at~C]hesapeake is e:ntitled:t0 purchase bi:the <br /> i~ 3 million gallons per day~:(MGD). ~ ~hie q~ <br /> 'only to Portsmeuth s Prese~t·needs~ but a!~ <br />to 5he projected maximum that wil:l be~n~'eded iz <br />tsmouth is completely built out. The~e is als( <br />reposed agreement fo~r Chesapeake to request up <br /> subject to the approval of Portsmouth ~t a ra~ <br />ed at that time. <br /> <br />'oposed <br />ntity is <br />o, is <br />the futur~ <br />provision <br />to 5MGD, <br />e to be <br /> <br /> <br />