Laserfiche WebLink
August 28, 1990 <br /> <br />353 <br /> <br />firm of CH2M.-Hill was the designer of Phases I & II of <br /> to the Lake Kilby Treatment Plant, including the <br />ew finished water pumping station. They will provide the <br /> the new pumps, electrical and control modifications, <br /> surge analysis and control design to furnish water to <br /> ain. Their fee, including the design, bidding, <br /> ion services and inspection is $110,182.00. <br /> <br />Engineering, Inc. will provide services on the three <br /> of the new pipeline - (1) Route selection and <br /> · y design, (2) Final design and bid assistance and (3) <br /> and inspection services. The cost to accomplish the <br />ection and preliminary design is S139,600.00. Once the <br />selected and necessary highway and/or railroad permits <br /> and a time schedule set, fees for the remaining two <br />will be negotiated and brought to Council for approval. <br /> <br /> project is complex and will be a major task for <br />h to accomplish. Its completion will insure that water <br /> in the proper quantities and at the proper pressure, <br /> industrial growth and to meet contractual <br /> with Chesapeake. Proceeds from the Chesapeake <br /> finance this project." <br /> <br />on of Mr. King and seconded by Mr. Hawks, the following <br />and authorization for the City Manager to contract with <br />and HDR En~neerng~ Inc., was approved on first reading, <br />animous vote: <br /> <br />ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $249,782.00 FROM THE PUBLIC <br />IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION <br />FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE NEW CHURCHLAND TRANSMISSION <br /> <br />59 Letter from the City Manager recommending adoption of <br />nce to amend Chapter 35 of the Code of the City of <br />l, Virginia, 1988 as amended, by amending section <br />~nd (e) thereof, and adding section 35-12(f), thereof, <br /> to erroneous tax assessments. <br /> <br /> 'our direction, I have had the question of refunds for <br /> ued by members of the office of the City Attorney and <br /> of Finance. State law provides for a method <br />7her~b~ ~he ~ommissioner or the Revenue or the City Assessor is <br />~ble t.~ ~erttfy to the Treasurer and the City Manager that an <br />.~rro~ has occurred in the assessment of taxes. Based on this <br />:ertific~tion, a reduction in the tax liability would occur or if <br />~he a e have been pa~d, a refund would be xssued. <br /> <br /> Thi~ method is similar to the process that is now occurring. <br />in l~eu ~f the refunds being brought before the City Council, <br /> the City Manager or his designee would act in the <br />;ap ~it of the approving authority. This would speed up the <br />~ro ~=ss y the amount of time required to place the item on the <br />tge ia. <br /> <br /> T~ <br />~or Fo~ <br /> <br />revi~itc~ <br />the Ir~ <br /> <br />fur ~e~ <br /> <br />attached ordinance has been prepared by the City Attorney <br />consideration should you wish to delegate the authority <br />would, therefore, recommend that you favorably consider <br />the City Code." <br /> <br />les B. Whitehurst, City Treasurer, spoke in opposition to <br />ance as presented to Council. <br /> <br />cil requested that the City Manager and the City Attorney <br />ther to try. to expedite the process of refunds even <br /> <br /> <br />