Laserfiche WebLink
hearing, <br />the Code <br />"Policie <br />amende¢ <br /> <br />public <br />the pr( <br /> <br /> N( <br />Portsm¢ <br />Comprel <br />design~ <br /> <br />o M~ <br /> e~ <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />November 27, 1990 <br /> <br />435 <br /> <br /> Planning Commission, after notice and public <br />as ~equired by Article 4 of Chapter 11 of Title 15.1 of <br />of Virginia, 1950, as amended, recommended that the <br />~ section of Chapter 8 of the Comprehensive Plan be <br />and <br /> <br /> the Council of the City of Portsmouth <br /> with notice as required by law, and <br />ced amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />has held a <br />has considered <br /> <br /> THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of <br />h, that the "Policies" section of Chapter 8 of the <br /> ~ive Plan for the City of Portsmouth, Virginia; <br /> CP-89-1 be, and hereby is, amended to read as follows: <br /> <br />CP-90-3 <br /> <br />POLICIES <br /> <br />er - Planned industrial and business parks wil~ be <br /> ed as a means of creating jobs whil~ protecting <br />hborhoods and environmental resources. <br /> <br />e( <br /> <br />D( <br /> <br />a] <br /> <br />choosing sites for tax-exempt land uses, sites with <br />ted potential value for job creation and tax ?ace <br />nsion should be given priority over sit~s with a high <br />imic development potential. Before any zoninG change or <br />)ermit for any tax-exempt land use located in the <br /> ~own Enterprise Zone is approved, the P~anni~ Director <br /> 1 provide the Planning Commission and C~ty Council with <br />nalysis of the following issues. <br /> . <br /> <br />alternative sites available? <br /> <br /> City departments or the PRHA tried to assist the <br /> icant in locating alternative sites? <br /> <br />w~ particular emphasis on the Ordinance's <br />e~q~urage economic development activities t <br />de~!rable emPloyment and enlarge the tax ba <br />W%~ Ch00sin~ sites f°r tax,exempt land use <br />l~ted pOtential value for job creation an <br />e~D~nsion should be given priority over sit <br />e~lomic development potential. <br />De~ei°pable commercial and industrial water <br />bi ~eserved for water dependent or water-re <br /> iarine and maritime businesses, port act <br /> a] commercial recreation. <br /> <br /> ~ic capital improvement pro~ects which w <br /> ,ate investment will be given a high pti <br /> ti new private development "pays for" the <br /> ~ovements through increased tax revenues <br /> <br />~he use is approved, will its enhancements of t~e <br />~ical, cultural or social environments o~fset t~e loss in <br />~ntial tax revenues? <br /> <br />d approval of the zoning change or use ermlt ce in <br /> Eonin~ Ordinance, <br /> i "to <br /> purpose <br /> ~at provide <br /> 30?" <br /> <br /> ~, sites with <br /> ~ tax~ b&se, <br /> ~s with a nigh1 <br /> <br />~Q us~ controls affecting the Downtown En <br />~q~ld ce periodically reviewed to assess <br />.~h the purposes of the Zone. <br /> <br />front altec <br />~ated u~es, such <br />ivities tourism, <br /> <br />ill sti!~ulate new <br />~rity, )rovided <br />~ublic <br />or new jobs. <br /> <br />terpris ~ Zone <br />heir co ~sistency <br /> <br /> <br />