January 29, 1923
<br />
<br /> 13. In several instances the ordinance provides a routing for cars and the same routing
<br />for trackless trolleys. Of course upon the adoption of the ordinance this will h~ve to be
<br />straightened out. It is suggested that the Council determine first whetker it will grant the
<br />trackless trolley franchise or not, as the whole scheme is based on that as an essential part
<br />of it.
<br /> lb. In view of the effort being made by the Auto-Bus Association to have the people adopt
<br />an ordinance-allowing jDtney competition, there should be some provision to protect the Com-
<br />pany in the event either the people or the Council should hereafter allow jitney competition
<br />except in the manner ~rovided in the ordinance itself.
<br />
<br /> Add as Section 7, of Article
<br /> "In the event that the Council of Graator, or the eleotzrs of the 0ity of Portsmouth,
<br />should du~ing the li~e of this franchise by ~mendment
<br />ordi~nce of the Council of Grantor, or by a vote by the electors of t~e City of Portsmouth,
<br />permit~or~!~ow the operation of any system of or separate vehicles for urban transportation
<br />in competition with grantee on streets nearer than two blocks from the portion of ~ny street
<br />on which grantee operates or may operate its street cars and busses in the City of Portemouth~
<br />unless and ~uutil grantee b~s previously given its con~ent thereto in writing except as provided
<br />in Article V1, and Section 6,,of Article lll, of this franchise, the grantor will release the
<br />grantee from all license taxes provided for in this franchise, ~s well ~s from all paving ob-
<br />ligations lmpesed on gr~atee by this franchise which fall due thereafter.~
<br /> lay. ~sleeck move~ that we begin with the ~A~n~ger's c,mmunications containing any proposed
<br /> ~mendments, taking each one separately. The motion was adopted,
<br /> Therefore, the com~u~uication of the ~an~ger dated January 3rd warm.taken up first.
<br /> With referamce to the kind of cars, Mr. ~ite moved thmt the following paragraph be added
<br /> at the end of Article ~, Section 5: "Provided that if in the opinion of the ~r~antee, the same
<br /> may, by ordinance, be recruited of the Ers~utee," The amendment was ~dopted.-
<br /> ~Ir. Oast moved that the reco~m-~endation of the Eanager to cut out the number of cars be
<br /> adopted. The motion was adopted, ~r. Brooks voting ~o.
<br /> With reference to the Nmnager's reoom~endmtion that the period for re-routing of jitneys
<br /> be changed from ninety days to thirty days, Er. F.~hite moved that the recommendation be not
<br /> concurred in. The motion was adopted.
<br />
<br /> Next, the com~huication of the ~anager of January 12th was taken up.
<br /> On motion, the Eanager was allowed to withdraw i-rem ~, as follows, same to be taken o~re
<br /> of when necessary: "Section 3, Article A, reference is made to connecting of tracks in Sixth
<br /> Avenue north of High street, with tracks os High street~ If existing franchises do not give
<br /> us the right of two tracks on Sixth Avenue, north of High Street, it would seem advisable to
<br /> secure this right at this time in the event it should become necessary to exercise it in ren-
<br /> derdngproper service in this territory."
<br /> ~ith reference to recommendation of the i~nage= that the following be added at the and of
<br /> Article E, Section 3-b, "and on Hatton street~ from Ann to B streets," Mr.-V~nite moved to con-
<br /> cur in the recommendation. The motion was adopted~
<br />
<br /> ~ With r~ference to recommendation that the first line of Article
<br /> follows: "~he trmoks on Lincoln street from Effingh~m ~o First street, and on ~First street,
<br /> from Lincoln to near Wythe," instead of "the tracks on Lincoln from Washington to First ~t~eet,"
<br /> Er. White moved th~ ~he recommendmtion be adopted, predicated on the Esaager making provision
<br /> for some kind of transportation down First street. ~e motion was adopted.
<br />
<br /> With reference to Article E, Section ~, Er. ~hite moved thmt the Eanager be authorized
<br /> to change the reading so that Graatee sh~!l be required to pave the sp~oe between and two feet
<br /> on each side of rails on all paved streets having single tracks and the tota2 space between
<br /> lines two feet outside of each outer rail on paved streets having double tracks. Adopte~.
<br /> ~tv. White moved that the following be added at the end of said Section: "and p~o~ided
<br /> further, that this section shal~ not abrogate Section 8 of contract entered into between the
<br /> City of Portsmouth and the Virginia Railway and Power Company on the E~t~h d~y of July, 1~13."
<br /> The motion was adopted.
<br />
<br />Then on motion of ~r. WhDte,
<br />
<br />the seotion~ as amended, was adopted.
<br />
<br />Section 6, line 8, the word "not" should precede the word
<br />
<br /> With ~efe=ence to Article 3,
<br />~suoh? Same already changed.
<br />
<br /> Ar~icl$ ~, paragraph ~2of Section l, on motion of i~lr. White, the following recommendation
<br />was concu~ed in: That the paragraph be oha~ed to read as follows: "(a) All cars will either
<br />p~ss over the entire loop or over suc~ portion of the loop as is neoesss~y, a~ east end of
<br />High street, via. ~ddle, County, Crawford, and High St~eems."
<br /> Art~icle ~, Section l, (b), on motion of ~. ~it~, the following recommendation was con-
<br />curred in: That sub-section (b) be changed to read ~s follows: ,(b) Park View Line: Starting
<br />on Crawford Street, at loop, and continuing mlor~ Orawford, to High, tm 0ou~t, to North, to
<br />Green, to 0aledonia, to Chestnut, to Ann, to H~tto~, to N~val, to Park, to Villa, to Cooke,
<br />to Leckie, to Webster, to B,~ to H~tton, to London, tc Middle, to County, to Orawford,"
<br />
<br />Paragraph F of same section and article had already been changed.
<br />
<br />On motion of ~r. cast, the following route recommended by the Eighth Ward Civic League
<br />
<br />
<br />
|