Laserfiche WebLink
September Ii, 1923 <br /> <br />Aug. 27th, to Mary Mitchell, I child's grave, lot No. ~0~, Ave. H. <br /> 2?th, G.L. Bailey, 1 child, s grave, lot No. l~, Ave. J. <br /> <br /> On motion, the recommendation of the ~nager was concurred in, and the proper <br />authorized ~o execute same. <br /> ........ ~t_~?~ ,I~t_~s de~velOped that the supervision of jitney service is of such ~g~de that <br />it is ess~nt~iml~t~t certain md~tions be made ~to the orga~zmtion both in perso~el and in <br />equipment. It is thought thmt mn office cmn be secured without cost, ms it is ~beolutely <br />necess~y ~ve some pl~e to tr~nsmct the business inciden~l to the supervision ms well <br />ms a l~c~tiSn for files, ~ecor~, sche~les, mo~t reports ~d for the pos~ti~ng of ~ily <br /> <br />City Officers <br /> <br /> The presenz Supervisor is working eighteen hours a d~y and I do%not believe that <br />it is Just to require this number of hours of a City employee nor can his work be efficient <br />under such strenuous conditions, schedules on all routes must be checked one hou~ of each <br />dmy, and a considerable amount of time is also spent cheoking up the busses in .order to insure <br />the receipt by the City of its 5% ~f gross receipts. A re~nlar weekly inspection should also <br />be m~de of all busses both as to their mechanical and sanitary condition. This inspection <br />should of course be a rigid one, covering brakes, motor, body and other parts of each bus in <br />order to reduce the chance of accidents and to render the bus transportation service dependable. <br />Busses are operated for a period of eighteen hours each day and some one responsible to the <br />City must be in touch with them the entire eighteen hours. Accidents must be investigated, <br />fare meters read each d~y ~ud various records kep~t up to date, The matter of records is of <br />particular importance, ~earing in ~ind the possibility that the CiSy may at some time in the <br />future take over the question ~ urban transportation. When that time comes, fig~uves should <br />be a~ailable giving exact facts relative to all details of cos~. For this reason, I am ~e~ <br />commending that the position of Inspector be authorized at a s~lary of $125.00 per month. In <br />addition authority is requested to purchase a typewriter at $100.00, stationery at $50.00, and <br />to install a telephone at $~.00 per month. Special appropri~%tions from funds received from <br />the operation of jitneys of these am~n~s is requested." <br /> <br />On motion, the recommendation was referred to the Finance OoSmittee. <br /> <br /> 6th. "I am submitting herewith by request dmaft of an ordinance appropriating 50% of <br />the net receipts by the City from the operation of mutohusses in the City of Portsmouth to <br />purchase, etc., of parks and playgrounds." <br /> <br />the <br /> <br /> An Ordinance Appropriating Fifty Per Cent of the Net Receipts by the City of Portsmouth <br />from the Operation of Autobusses in the City of Portsmouth to the Pumchase, Equipment, Opera- <br />tion and Mmintenance of Parks and Playgrounds. <br /> <br />On motion of M~. Brooks, the ordinance was placed on its first reading~ <br /> <br /> 7th. "In the passage of the recent partial zoning ordinance, the penalty caluse was some- <br />how ommitted from the Wecond copy of the ordinance submitted to the Council, although it appear- <br />ed on the first copy. I am submitting copy of ordins~uce with penalty clmuse incorporated. It <br />is recommended that the ordinance be re-ordained as per the attached copy." <br /> <br /> An Ordinance Prohibiting the Erection of Business Places, Public Gsmages and IndUstrial <br />Establishments in Residential Sections. <br /> <br /> On motion of N~. Stewart (J. R.), the ordinance ~as placed on its first reading. <br /> <br /> Sth. "In accordance withal%he instructions of the Council, I have had ~nother interview <br />with Mr. C. O. Haines, President of the Seaboard Wh~rf and Warehouse Company in which I put <br />up to him four propositions: first, the question of furnishing definite plans for the proposed <br />improvement of the Seaboard Wharf and Warehouse Company property on First St.; second, the <br />investment of a larger amount than $100,000.00 in the enterprise; third, the limitation of the <br />expendi~are proposed by the Company to new construction; the extension of the lease beyond <br />thirty year's. M~. Haines reiterated his inability to ~apply plans on the g~ounds that it would <br />render it impossible for him to raise the money a~d I was un~ble to effect a change in his view- <br />point. <br /> <br /> With reference to the investment of a tamger amount he showed that with the mSrt- <br />gage now on the property, it would be impossible to ~t present raise a larger amount than thmt <br />proposed by him. It is m~ opinion that he is correct lnthls, <br /> <br /> He was also unwilling to limit the proposed expenditures to new construction, as <br />he claims that theLlarger part of his property is of little value without modifications. This <br />is probably true, but I c~n not avoid the fact that $100,O00.00 will accomplish little if it <br />is to be divided between new construction and repairs to the old property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Haines was of the opinion that a renewable clause should be placed in ~he lease. <br />I suggested to him that the City would probably be willing to do this, provided a definite <br />am~ant was expended in new construction during the first thirty years lease. I would ~uggest <br />that if the Council accepts Mr. Haines' provision, they might put in a clause that if $500,000.~0 <br />was expended in new construction during ~he first thirty year lease, the lease would be renewed <br />for another thirty years. <br /> <br /> The Whole problem of the lease of street ends to the Seaboard Wharf & Warehouse <br />Co. is difficult to handle. As I previously pointed out, the street ends, as street ends, <br />are of little or any use to the City. On the other hand, the v~lue of the Seaboard Wharf & <br />WarehOuse property will be seriously impaired without the street ends and'it is probable that <br />the City might force a sale of this property at a very low figure by refusing to lease the <br />street ends, yet I do not feel that we want ~o be in,the position of wrecking one business <br />in order to give another one a chance ~o start with low capitalization. By making this lease, <br />we certainly secure m definite return in taxes from the stree~ endm, whereas we will get nothing <br />if we do not lease them. I have exhausted my efforts to effect an adjustment Of this matter <br />and am therefore a~ain returning the matter to the Council with a ~repetition of my former <br /> <br /> <br />