Minutes 04/17/1925 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

April 17, 1925 let. That th~ appraisers u~der the contract will preclude ~rom consideration the factor k~own and designated as 'going concern v~lue.' 2nd. That the fees of ~ll apprs~tsers and other incidental e~enses shmll be paid as operati~ e~ense of the ferries ~d that the fee pmid to individ~l ~opr~ise=s shall be the 3rd. That the ~lue fixed by the appraisers ~s~the fai~ v~lue of all the ~rope=ty, etc., s~l be t~ken ms the amour due the ~verr~ent by the Oity ~nd Oo~ty ~ p~ee of the bal~ce of the property debt ms of J~y 2nd, 192~. We~uderst~d thmt the first item is ~l~emdy removed from dis~sslon by the oision of the A~to=ney Gene=~ that 'goi~ concern vmlue' could not properly be considered under the cont=ac~. The=e is hence no need of cove~g this point by a supplemental contract. The 0o~oil ~d the Bo~d of Supervisors ~sse~t to p~ying the ~eder~ appraisers ~d on~lf ~HetCo~ensa~ion of the fifth ~p~miser from ferry f~ds provided: let. Thmt the ~pDrmisers ~e directed to deduct ~uoh oo~en~tion ~d ~oident~l e~enses in~ed~ the Gover~ent ~ the app=aisml from the ~pp=mised value of the property. Should the controlle= l~ter object to this the p~ment ~y then be ~de by the Government ms ~ opera- ting e~ense of ~e ferries. 2nd. Thmt the apD=~is~be c~r~ied to m ~ocess~l oonolusion~d the ~w~d of the prmise~s.mcceptedbythe Gove~ent. 3=d. That ~ll ~ppraise=s receive the s~e pe= ~em co~ens~tion. The Oo~cil ~nd the Board of Superviso=s c~ not ~=ee to the third item ~ it is ~ifestty unfair to the c~ers of the ferries ~d would oo~el th~ to substi~te the ~pp=mised v~lue of the proper~y fo= the b~ce of the pro~=ty debt even were the ~r~lsed ~ue ~emter than the re~i~bal~oe due. The o~y two i~ort~t ~e~ cove=ed by the supplemental cont=act ~-e the ~go~ conce~ v~ue' ~d the pay of the appraisers. T~ fi~s~ o~ ~ese i~ems as stated above ~s ~e~y been settled by the A~torney G~e~ ~d this le~te~ disposes of th~ seco~. Hence, neither the Oo~ciI no~ the ~d of Su~isozs o~ see the ~ecessity fo~ any ~pp~ement~ oontrac~ ~d co~equently they deol~e to ente~ into ~y such ~reement ~d do not desire mny ~ther dis,~ssio~ o~ th~ matter~ ~ 1 Pri~ to July ~nd, 1924, mt the ve~oa ~estion of~_em~o!oyee of the E~usi~ Oo~or~tio~, ~& ~estion of ~ infor~l ~p~isal ~s taken up wl~ you ~order to ~s~e that the p~msi~ of the written offer should be acceptable to the H~s~g Oorpor~tion. ~e ~ft o~ it was sent to you ~d approved by you. L~ter, the fo~l ~itten offer coveri~ this ~estion was sent to you mhd duly accepted by you ms pzesident of the ~ousi~Oorporation. Act~de~ ~tho=ity of the Oity ~d 0o~ty, I proceeded ~ p~ep~e the n~cessa~y ~tm'frOm the ~oint of ~e Oity ~ Oo~ for thi~ ~p~r~is~ ~t~r months of your office then raised a ~aestion as to ~go~ oonoe~ ~ ~indic~ted tha~ you w~Id not proceed with the infor~l ~onrmis~l, ~though you hmd def~itely~reed to 9o so ~less we accepted yo~ view ~s to ~go~ conce~ v~ue.' ~ter, you =aised the ~estmon of the v~lidity of the ~tire cont=mct, then the question of the pay of the ~op~isers ~d fi~l~ the inte~retation of the te~ 'then property d~ot~ offerl~ ~ ~lement~ oont~mc~ w~ch you stated m~t be accepted by the Oity ~d 0o~nty~fore you would go fo~d wmth~th~ fo~ml appraise. The 0ity ~d 0o~ty h~ve consistently ~sisted, s~ce the failure of the infor~ ~pp=mis~, which fmit~e was ~e entirely to the ~otion of the ~us~ Oo~o~tion,~o~lz its rights ~uder the contract. 0~ efforts h~ve ~s f~ De~ ~ntmrely without success~ I ~now directed to ~sk you to' give me m categorical ~itten r~ly mo~t l~ter thmnApri! 20th as to whethe= you p=opGse ~to go ~emd, i~ good f~ith, with the apor~isal provi~d by the cont~ao~ of October 8th, !~18. Im ~affirm~tive re~ly Is not re~e~ved on o= before that date ~nd if your appraisers ~ve not be~ mppo~ted wi~de~i~e i~st~o~ions t~ prooeed~der the oontrac~ with the app=~sal of the pzoperty on or before the s~e date, the 0ity ~d~ 0o~ty will f~st ~ope~ to the Secretly of Labor, then to the Prosier of t~e United States, if satisfaoto=y =es~lts ~e not obta~ed f=om the Secretly of Labored f~lly to the p~oper 0o~ts, if necessm~y. A oo~y of this lette= is bei~ given to the press as we believe it is o~y f~= thmt the public shoed be ~lly info,ed as to where the =espo~ibility for the i~x~ble de~y in the settlement of the fo=fy oont=~ct lies." Onmotion of ~. Stewmrt (J.R.), the reco~en~ion of th~u~er ~s conc~red t~ 0!erk ~t~cted to fox,rd copies of the co~io~tion to. our Senmtors ~d Re ~th. "I ~ forwar~ he=ewith o~di~ce requir~ ce=t~in tradesmen enteri~ mpar~ment houses ~o use t=~e ent=~oes where ~oh ~t=anoes are provi~d. Its pmssmge is An O2dinance Requ~ing Tradesmen to Use Trade Entrances in Aps~rtme~t Houses. On motion of Mr. Cast, the ordinance w~s p~ced on its ~trst re~ding. 1Oth.~ "I ~ enclosi~ herewith ~ letter ~rom ~. L. J. R~per, Di=ector of ~bl~o ~e!f~e, i~ which he~reco~nds thmt the Omty in ~e p~y $15.O0 o~ the $2~5.09 mon~ly~ ~en~ ~nmr~ea for ~e tuber,~osis clinic w~ch is now ~in~ned by the s~e e~ Oh~mst~S ~mms. ne ~ows thmt ~3% o~ the visits to the cl~io are ~de foz ~oses ~ther t~ t~ber~lcsis. A total of 8,~ visits were ~de ~r~ !92~.