~uly 23, 1929
<br />
<br /> At sYmeet.~ng of the Oit~ Oouncil July 23rd there were present:
<br />
<br /> Messrs~Vernon Brooks, J. O. D~*~rd,. E.W. Maupin, Jr.,
<br /> A~thur Mayo, J. Alden Oast, J. R. Stewsmt,
<br /> Archibald Ogg, 7-
<br /> _Also the Oity Ms~uager.
<br />
<br /> The minutes of the =e~l~ meeting July ~th were read ~d were app=ov~ed.
<br /> The following co~iomtions were =e~ from the Oity M~ager:
<br /> let. "I ~e~ectf~ly c~l
<br />you= a~tention to the fact that ~e S~ate B~k of Po~t~outh suspended business on Wetordry,
<br />July 10, 1929, ~d that ~he si~ing fundsof theOity deposited in this b~k~e protected
<br />~ a bond of $~,000.00 exerted by the United States Fidelity ~d G~s~ty Oemp~y ~ surety.
<br />The Oity Ole=k ~d myself notified ~he s~y comply of t~s b~k's f~ilure, ~d it will
<br />p~obably be necess~y to execute proofs of loss o~ other p~pe=s in ~eotlon therewith.
<br />therefore request that you ~thorize me to ~ecute in the n~e of ~he city~ ~d under tbs seal
<br />of the city, attested by the Oity Ole~k, su~ p~pers as may be necessary, and to .t~e such
<br />othe~action as may be necess~y to i~s~e the collection of the ~o~t due ~der the bond.e
<br /> On motion of Mr. Stew~t, the =eco~endation of the M~ger was concurred in, ~d the
<br />Oity Atto~ey ~=u~ed ~ give such assist~ce as may be needed.
<br />~ 2~d. "I mos~ ~espectfully submit the following info~tion relative to the proposed
<br />bridge from Wes~ P~k ~lew to B~a ~:
<br />
<br /> Gost of Oonstruction-
<br /> Type A- Greosoted timber bridge, simila~n construction to the bridge constructed
<br /> by Norfolk Ooun~y, 9onnec~ng.~We~t .H~en_~a~.d Wa~e~view~ ~' .$16,350.00
<br /> LocatiOn ~1, Leckie~.-~in len~, ~s' =oaaw~ ~ w~ay
<br /> Location ~2, Sp~atley St~ in le~th~ 18' to,way ~d ~' ~al~ay.., lO, y20..~~
<br /> Type ~ A 30~ creosoted timbe~ sp~ with b~e~s, etc. to be ~lt in ch~nel
<br /> of creek flor wate~ay- ~ew~y approaches supported on each side with
<br /> creosoted pileS ~d timber ~l~ead- piles to be ~aced 5 ft. centers,
<br /> -~ ft. long~ $~ead composed of th=es layers 2" x lO" sheet pili~,
<br /> 30 rs. long, f~stened ~o ~ x 10" st=ing~rs.
<br /> ~Es~im~ted t~t it Wo~ t~$e between 15,0OO ~d 16,000 cubic yards
<br /> of fill.
<br /> Estimated cost of this type ............................................ $30,000.00
<br />
<br /> A~d y~ will 'find cop~ ef ~ lette~ from O~sell & Oas~l, stating
<br />Robert L~ S~a~s~=othe~s Would dedicate a s~=ip of 1~ s~ty fe~t wide, ~ich ~i~
<br />a~ ~t Lec~e St., ~xtending westw~y from P~k View to th~ een~e~ of the c=eem
<br />the Shem ~ from Park Vmew ~d t~t the~a B~othe=s will execute ~y Paper 1which may De
<br />=e~=ed to dedicate this strip of l~d w~i~n ~i1 extend the st=eot from its abutting point
<br />wi~h Leckie St. to Eighth Ave. on the Shem l~d, the strip ~ef l~d dedicated robe in c0nfomity
<br />with the other st=eels laid out on the R~ L. ~hem plat.
<br />
<br /> M~. ~ea ~d Mr. ~Oassell hmve into=erred themselves in se~=ing~the signatures
<br />of prepe~y owners ~o~g the water f=on~ t have ~ letter from ~hem they have
<br />sec~ed sixties of the owners of property on ~the west side ef Soo extending
<br />Glasgow St. ne=th to the point of the p~oposed b~idge crossing ~d of the'
<br />o~e=s of property on the eas~ side of Scotts Greek from~Gl~sgow Et. to the proposed bridge
<br />crossing, with the exceptie~ of two o~e=s on the e~t side. The ~gent, ~epresenting the
<br />estate, ~ich is one of the o~e~s, gave am~r~ce that objec~lon~ll mot be raised to the
<br />p~oposed bri~e without a draw ove~ ~c~ts Oreck. The others, jo~ o~ers of quite ~ bit
<br />of water front property on the east side, ~ ~itten to me that they objected to the bri~e
<br />and I ~ attaching hereto a copy of 'their letter setti~fo~th thei~ ~e~so~s for s~e.
<br />
<br /> i.ha~e taken up with the United States Engineers Office the question o~ the
<br />quitrents of the ~ve=~en~ i~ grating ps,lesion for a.b=i~ at t~is ~oc~t~on '~.w~s
<br />fo=mod ~ it ~epe~ed enti=eZy on whether or not ~y o~ecti~ns we~ r~se~ b~ pa~
<br />ce~ed~d if they were well~fo~ded ~d mt ~ch time ~a~we m~deappA~a~xo~ ~n~ ~u~
<br />pl~d~p of w~t we proposed t9 do, a public he~ri~_wo~l~, be nelm ~o ~e~e~xn~ ~Z mne
<br />~jectio~, if m~, wo~d be s~t~aed, ~d regardless o~ wnem~'= or no~ ~y_
<br />m~e, we wo~d hmve to m~e ~pplic~tiom ~d su~it plus mo= the propose~ werE. ~m wo~a nave
<br />to t~e the re~ procedure. The ~plic~ion, ~p ~dpl~e of the brid~Wo~d ~e ~o be
<br />presented l~n ~licate. ~e m~p ~s~w the p=gpesed ioc~tion, the w~e~ay ~o oe c=ossea
<br />~d n~e of pa=ti~l~ loc~ity, depth of w~ter, in vmcinity of the proposed st~cture, etc.
<br />I have t~ re,ar applic~tiom, accomp~ied by the law, from the Engineering~ Department.
<br />
<br /> -As sta~ed ~fo=e, I believe a b~idge at this t~e is desi=able~ but not nece~s~y.
<br /> However, I ~tieve i~ will st~ate v~es in that vicimi~y ~d will $~w ret~ on the i~
<br /> ves~men~ in time. If it ~evelops, eit~ t~ough opiniQ$ of the City Attorney or o~lnion of
<br /> the Oo~ ~hat we a~e obligm~ to ~ild this b=i~e ~de= theaters of the ~nex~t~on~p~-
<br /> oeedi~s, I believe the location ~d~type of bri~e which womld best s~ o~ neeas ~a m~n~oes,~
<br /> would~e locmtio~ $1, T~e A- a c~eoso~d t~be=~b=i~eextendi~g from Leckie ~t., estimated
<br /> cost $16,350.00."
<br /> "Portsmouth, ~a., J~y 22,
<br />
<br /> Oity M~r,
<br /> Pe=t~outh,
<br />
<br />Dear Sir;--
<br /> W~*~wv~r~m te our conversation this A. M+, concernin~ the bridge connecting Fifth
<br />
<br />
<br />
|