Laserfiche WebLink
January 24th, 1933. <br /> <br /> I request that I be authorized To institute a suit a~d cause the same te be <br />sold to satisfy~the lien of the taxes thereono~ <br /> <br />adopted. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Fox to concur in the recommendation of the Oity Attorney was <br /> <br /> 2nd - ,At your last meeting you referred to me the following court orders cor- <br />recting the assessment of taxes, upon which I beg to report as follows: <br /> <br /> (1) Order of court reducing the assessment of J~S. Lawrence uoon the <br />Firestone Building in the sum of Fifteen Hundred($1500.O0) Dollars. It ~opeared-from the~ <br />evidence in this case that the assessors placed a value of 416,000.00 on the buildings on <br />this land, which included the total cost of the concrete roadway in the street end tar£~s <br />belonging to the Firestone 0empanyo The court took off the sum of 'l 00,00 and Er <br /> $ 5 o Lawrence <br />should be refunded the s~m of $39.~5 for taxes paid for~the year l~31 and relieved of the <br />sum of $3~.75 on the taxes for the year 1932o <br /> (2) Order of court relieving Effie H~ Ballard of the sum of 48000.00 as- <br />sessed on the property 504-06 High Street in the name of Annie B. Walker~ Ers. Ballard <br />filed an anplication for the correction of-pro~erties ~500-02, 504-06, 508-10 High Street, <br />~18 D_nw~e~ ~ ~ ' Street and 422 Dinwiddie Street. The court denied he~ petition on all but <br />504-06 High Street. Th~ Board of Equalization has raised the assessment upon this land <br />from 45000.00 to 413,000.00 under the erroneous belief that the upstairs of the building <br />was finished and divided into rooms. Upon examining the building, they admitted their mis- <br />take to the court. Mrs. Ballard should be relieved of the sum of $212.00 for each of the <br />years t931 and 1~32. <br /> (3) Order of court reducing the assessments of the property of <br />Smith. The assessment of the land of Mr~ smith, described as lots y~ and ~9 S. Leckie Street, <br />was reduced ~2,350.00. It appeared from the evidence in the case that he was charged with <br />more high land than he actually owned at $20.00 a front foot~ The assessment of his property <br />~104 Elm Ave. was also reduced SyO0.O0. The members of the Board of Eq~3alization testified <br />that the assessment was placed on the propert~ under the ~beiief that his residence contained <br />a heating plant and the sum of 4yO0.O0 was taken off the assessment because of the fact th zt <br />the building contained no heating plant. Mr~ Smith should be relieved of the sum of <br />for each of the ~years l~l and 1~32 on ~0t $. Leckie and the sum of 421.20 for each of <br />the years 1931 and 1932 on pFoperty ~ So Leckie, and the sum of 418.55 for each of the years <br />l~31 ~nd 1~32 on prooe rty 10~ ~lm Ave. <br /> (4) Order o~ court relieving Ivor Ac Page for taxes on certain properties. <br />The increased assessment on five pieces of property placed thereon by the Board of Equaliza- <br />t ion was removedby the court. Mr~ Page should be relieved of the following t~xes for each <br />of the years l~31 aud 1~32o <br /> <br />~lOD1-03 Green Street .......................... $13.25 <br />1005-07 GreenStreet ........................... 26.50 <br />llll Green Street ............................ <br />l~ll5-1? Green Street ....................... 5.30 <br />833 Bart Street ...................... 10.60 <br /> <br /> (5) Order of court reducing the assessment of the land of EcEwen Lumber <br />GorDoration from 451~0.00 to $~000.00. This was an assessment made by the assessors and it <br />appeared from the ev~idence that they inc.luded in their, amsessment more- land than actually b.eT~ <br />longed to the McEwe~ Lumber Gompany. Th~s company should be refunded the sum cf $30.~8. pa~d <br />on the 1~31 taxes and 430o~y paid on the 1932 taxes. <br /> W (~A Order oicourt relieving Kate V~ Ellis of an assessment of 41200.O0 <br />against lot 262 irt~ venue~ Ers~ Ellis was assessed with $1200.00 for a building upon'this <br />lot by error, there being no building upon the land~ She should be relieved of the payment <br />of $~1.80 for each of the years 1931 and 1932.~ <br /> <br />adopted. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Brooks to concur in the 0ity Attorney's recommendation was <br /> <br />and rgad: <br /> <br />The following ordinance placed on its first reading January 10th was taken up <br /> <br />SAN ORDINANOEREQUIRING~THE SEALER OF ~fEIGHTS AND NEASURES TO <br />PErfORM THE DUTIES OF LICENSE INSPEOTOR.~ <br /> <br />On motion of Mr. Mayo the ordinance was adopted and by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes -_Brooks, Fox, Hutchins, ~yo, Moore, 0asr, 0gg - 7- <br /> <br />Nays <br /> <br />and read: <br /> <br />The following ordinance placed on its first reading January loth was taken <br /> <br />~AN ORDINANOE TO REPEAL AN 0RDINANOE ENT~ITLED SAN 0RDINANOE UREATING <br />A BUREAU OF NARKE~S AND STANDARDS IN THE DEPART~ENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, <br />(~ONBISTING OF THE DIViSION OF ~fEIGHTS AND MEASURES, LiOENSE LNSPEOTION <br />A~YD MUNICIPAL MARKETS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE NEOESSARY EMPLOYEES TO <br />GAP~RY OUT THE PROVISIONS OF THE ORDINANOE. ~ <br /> <br />On motion of Mr. Mayo the ordinance was ado~ ed, and by the following vote: <br /> <br /> <br />