Laserfiche WebLink
Notion of Mr. Mayo that we concur in the Manager's recommendation and that an <br /> appropriation of $2,000.00 for said purpose be laid on table until next meeting, was adopted. <br /> <br /> 3rd-- "The special Session of the General Assembly of Virginia, which closed <br /> last week, passed a hil.1 known a.s House BilI ~59; amending Portsmouth, s-charter by adding <br /> a mew section uumbered ~ A, which reads as ~ollows.. <br /> ' section ~8-A. The 0ity 00lleCtcr in cclleoting taxes shall <br /> Collect the oldest taxes first, and shall in no case issue <br /> his receipt for the current-year until all prior taxes are <br /> paid. The possession of a tax receipt issued by the City <br /> Collector shall be conclusive evidence that all prior taxes <br /> which are chargeable against the lands in such receipt de- <br /> scribed or in case of a personality tax against the person <br /> named in such re~ipt, have been fully paid and shall De a <br /> ba~ to the collection of any prior taxes thereon, unless <br /> oth_erw?e stated in the receipt. This section shall not <br /> ap_.p~.y ~9 any receipts-.!ssued on or before December 31st,1933.' <br /> · 'A'his blllw as presented by Delegate McNurran without.any consultation <br />so far as I know, wroth any~0fficials from the Oity of Portsmouth. As th~s bill was enacted <br />by the General Assembly, I am instructing the Oity Oollector to see that the provisions ef <br />the bill are made known and understood by all the employees of his office and are strictly <br />adhered to." ' <br /> <br /> Notion of Mr. Brooks to refer to Oity Attorney to correlate this Act of the Leg- <br /> islature with cur prepayment tax ordinance, was adopted; <br /> <br /> ~th- ,At the meeting of the ~ouncil on August 22nd, a resolution was adopted, <br />to the effect tha~ you were opposed to the passage of the bill presented in the General As- <br />sembly of Virginia By Delegate R. Y. McMu~ran, permitting cities to waive the collection of <br />penalties and interest as new fixed by law upon delinquent taxes for a period of years. Oepy <br />of this resoldtion was mailed to th~ Delegates from Portsmouth. However, the bill was enacted <br />Dy the 'General Assembly of Virginia, authorizing the councils or other governing bodies ef <br />cities and towns to release all persons, firms, associations ~nd corporations from all liabi- <br />lity far interest, penalties and accrued costs on any taxes due such cities and towns for any <br />year or years prior to and including the year 1932, that are unpaid at the time the ordinance <br />relieving same goes into effect, provided such unpaid taxes are paid such cities and towns <br />within one hundred and twenty days after the date this act shall be in force. <br /> In view of the passage of ~his bill by the General Assembly of Virginia, <br />I consider it important that you decide promptly whether Portsmouth will avail itself of the <br />provisions of this law or not° ~nless this is done, i am of the opinion that the collection <br />of taxes will be materially retarded. I recommend that we do not avail ourselves of the pro- <br />visions of this Act." <br /> <br /> Notion ef ~v· ~ox to ccncu~ in .the Manager's recommendation was adopted. <br /> <br />- UNFINISHED BUSINESS - <br /> <br />The-follewing communications from the Oity Attorney were read: <br /> <br /> ,At your last meetLug you referred to me a letter from Antonio Facenda,- complain- <br />ing of certain personal property assessments. According to the records of the Oity Oollector's <br />office, personal property tax for 1928 a. ssessed against A. Faoenda, 609 Fourth Street, con- <br />sisting of an assessment of $210.00 cn household fu~nit-,~re and $100.00 on am automobile, is u~- <br />paid. Another Ac Facenda of 221 Henry Street was assessed for $80.00 for household furniture. <br />I do not see how there can be any mistake in the tickets,as Claimed l~y Mr. Facenda iu his let- <br />ter. The Oommissioner of Revenue stated to me that the only error that might be in the assess- <br />ment is the $100.00 for the automobile. I have no way of checking at this time, whether Mr. <br />Facenda owned an automobile in 192~. <br /> As to the 1932 assessment, I examined the original returm in the office of the <br />Oommissioner of Revenue which show an assessment against Mr. Facenda of $125J00 at his resi- <br />dence, 609 Fourth Street, $~100.00 being on household and kitchen furniture and $25~00 for a <br />radio and an assessment of $200,00 on his barber shop fixtures at 600 Oourt Street· As the <br />Oouncil has no jurisdiction over the assessment, there is nothing that can be done in this <br />matter." <br /> <br />On motion ordered filed. <br /> <br /> "At your last meeting you referred to me a communication ~om Flossie 0verton, <br />requesting a reward for causing the arrest of A T. Silvester. The police record shows that <br />this man was arrested and tried on a charge of disorderly conduct and drunkenness and was <br />fined Ten($10.O0) Dollars· Flossie 0verton tells me that she reported him to the police, af- <br />ter seeing him tamper with a fire alarm bcx, and that the police came ~u and arrested him. She <br />also stated that she testified te this fact before the Police Justice, but the man was ar- <br />rested on a charge of disorderly conduct and evidently the Police Justice did not consider him <br />guilty of turning in a false alarm. The punishment for turning ina false alarm is from $50.00 <br />te $100.OO and confinemen~ in jail from fifteen to thirty days. The resolution of the Oity <br />Oounciloffering a reward in such cases requires the arrest and conviction. As the party was <br />not convicted under the city ordinance for turning in a false alarm, there is no claim to the <br />reward." <br /> <br />On motion ordered filed. <br /> <br />read: <br /> <br />The following ordinance placed on its first reading August 22nd, was taken up and <br /> <br /> <br />