|
sion~r of the' Revenue and had the same assessed. Consequently, this particular house has
<br /> been assessed twice. Mr. LeD~oyen should be refunded the sum of $31.80 for each of the ~ars
<br /> 1931 and 1932 and relieved oz~$31.80 for the year 1933.
<br /> 2. Petition of T.B. Lee for the relief of taxes.
<br /> The facts set forth in Mr. Lee~s letter are correct and he should be
<br />'relieved of taxes for the years 1932 and 1933, amounting to $3.18 for each year on lot 42
<br />Columbia Street. I have requested the Commissioner of the Revenue to -assess this lot against
<br />Mamie and Martin Wright.
<br /> . 3. Petition of Nathan Goldstein for -relief of taxes. -
<br /> The assessment made against Jennie Rcbbins by the assessors of 1925 on
<br />the property Scott Street was in error as rs. Robbins Sold the property in 1922.
<br />comparing the assessment of the land with the other three corners and With other land in the
<br />same bloc~k, it aooears that Mr. Goldstein was assessed with the whole lot, but proMb~ably with
<br />one house, and that the small house was assessed to Mrs. Robbins. The tax against ~s. Rob -
<br />bins is erroneous and I recommend that the offer of Mr. Goldstein to pay on the house be ac-
<br />cepted and
<br /> that the tax be disposed of as follows:
<br /> 1926 $6.25 to be paid by Mr.~Goldstein and $10.00 relieved.
<br /> 1927 $6.75" " , . . u " $10.80 "
<br /> 1928 $6.63" " " " " " " $10.60 "
<br /> 1929 $6. . " " " " "$lO. ,, ;
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Fox to appropriate $63.60 to refund Mr.
<br />in err~ and to relieve him
<br />
<br />1932 paid
<br />adopted.
<br />
<br /> LeDoyen taxes for 1931 and
<br />of $31.80 for 1933 taxes charged in error (Item 1), was
<br />
<br />and read:
<br />
<br />Motion of
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr.
<br />
<br />Fox that Item 2 be concurred in,
<br />Fox that item 3 be concurred in,
<br />
<br /> -- UNFINISHED BUSINESS _
<br />
<br />was adopted.
<br />was adopted.
<br />
<br />The follow,Lug ordinance, placed on first reading at last me,ting, was
<br />
<br />taken up
<br />
<br /> "AN ORDINANOE PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN TEE BUSINESS
<br /> OF BUYING OR SELLING, OR OFFERING TO BUY OR SELL UNUSED
<br /> PORTION OF NON-TRANSFERABLE RAILROAD OR STEAMSHIP TICKETS
<br /> · AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR ITS VIOLATION."
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr. Fox, the ordinance was adopted and by the following vote:
<br />Ayes: Brooks, Fox, Hutohins, Mayo, Moore, Oast, Ogg'-
<br />
<br />Nays: None.
<br />
<br />read:
<br />
<br />The following ordinance placed on first reading at ~st meeting, was taken up and
<br />
<br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO REGULATE MOTOR PASSENGER BUSES
<br />OPERATING FROM POINTS WITHIN TO POINTS BEYOND THE LIMITS
<br />OF THE CITY, PROVID~G RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE USE
<br />OF THE STREETS OF THE CITY BY SUOH BUSES AND PROVIDING
<br />FOR BUS TERMINALS, AND PRESORIBiNG PENALTIE~ FOR THE
<br />VIOLATION THEREOF."
<br />
<br />against the
<br />
<br />~otion of Mr. Ogg to grant privilege of the floor to anyone interested, was adopted.
<br />
<br />Mr. J.M. Overton, Mr. Charles Kaufman, Mr. Murray and Mr. Robert McMurran, spoke
<br />adoption of said ordinance.
<br />
<br /> Mo~ion of Mr. B~ooks to lay the ordinance on the table was lost, and by the fol-
<br />lowing vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Brooks, Hutchins, Ogg - 3.
<br />
<br />Nays: Fox, Mayo, Moore, 0ast - 4.
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr. 0gg to strike out Section 4 was lost,
<br />
<br />Ayes: Brooks, Hut~hins, Ogg - 3.
<br />
<br />Nays: Fox, Mayo, Moore, Cast - 4.
<br />
<br />and b,y the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Brooks to make Section ~ effective two years six months after the
<br />dinance becomes operative, was lost and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Brooks, Hutohins, Ogg - 3,
<br />
<br />Nays: Fox, Mayo, Moore, Cast-
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. ~ox,_the ordinance was adopted and by
<br />
<br />Ayes: Fox, Mayo, Moore, Cast - 4.
<br />
<br />Nays: B~ooks, Hutchins, Ogg - 3.
<br />
<br />the following vote:
<br />
<br />
<br />
|