Laserfiche WebLink
April 2~6_th. lqMS. <br /> <br /> 2. Petition of Mfs.Elizabeth Corwine to be relieved of certain personal taxes. <br /> It appears that the taxes assessed against this party were o~pied from previous <br /> years. I am informed that Mrs. Corwine broke up house-keeping and resided with her brother- <br /> in-law. The Deputy 0ommissioner of the Revenue <br /> agrees with me that she should be relieved of <br />the following taxes: 1935-$2.65, 1935- $2.65, 1936 $2.65, and 1931- $2.65. <br /> <br /> 3. Petition of Miss Essie Lee Bittle, to be relieve~ of certain property taxes. <br /> According to the letter of M{ss Bittle, she is properly assessed for the years <br />1933 and 1937. The previous years were assessed against her father. She has the privilege <br />of paying her taxes without paying those assessed against her father. ' <br /> $. Petition_of j.- T. Garner .concerning personal prope~y taxes. <br /> Prom the best information whi:h I have been able to obtain Mr. Garner disposed of <br />his farniture in 1931, and he should be relieved of personal property taxes for the years <br />I9301932 andt° 1937,1931 andam°untingMr. Garnert° $15.52,has paidwiththeintereStsame., and penalties . He was prooerly~ assessed for <br /> <br /> I~otio~ of Mr. Pox to concur in the Attorney, s recommendation, was adopted. <br /> <br /> 3rd - HIn connection with the request of Mrs. Georgeana A. Webb for the re - <br /> lief of taxes, referred to me at your last meeting, I find that Mrs. Webb is the owner of one <br /> lot at the southwes~ corner of Washington s-nd Columbia Sts. The assessor <br /> have assessed her with two lots 'm~t~ ~e ~ ~+ ...... s of 1920 appear to <br /> lot of ~he same frontage then ~ll2~T2 Zi ~"~£ ~. ~a valua~zon of $1600.00. The adjoining <br /> corner was assessed to° ' ~oo~===~ ~ e. ri.naa&, was assessed at $1150.00. The southeast <br /> Mrs. Indie E. Halstead, at $1350.00. The lot adjoining the Halstead <br />proper~y was assessed to Isaac Pass at $1150.00o I~ therefore appears that the laud in both <br />blocks was intended to have been assessed the same. It appears to me that Mrs. Webb should <br />have been assessed for $1350.00 instead of $1600o00 for the years 1921, 1922, 1923, 1925 and <br />1925, with an error of $250.00 in her assessment. <br /> The assessors of 1925 assess.ed the Webb land at $1500,00, the Hall <br />land at $10eO.O0 and the Malstead land at $1000.00, the Priedman (or Pass) land at $1150., <br />and the Troy land at $1100. It appears to me td~at Mrs. Webb should have had a land assessment <br />of $1250.00 and that there was an error of $250.00. <br /> The assessors of 1930 and 1935 as~s.essed the Webb land at $1790.00, <br />the-Hall land at $810.00; the Hatstead land at $1250.00; tne Priendman (or Pass) land at <br />$1050.00, and M. A. Troy in the block with Halstead and Friendman at $1050.00, showing a high~ <br />er assessment in the later block. Using the same differential for the corner, Mrs. Webb should <br />have bean assessed for $1000.00. The~e was therefore an error of $790.00 in her assessment for <br />~he yea~s 1931 tc 1938, inclusive. <br /> Mrs. Georgeanna A. ~Vebb, u~der the policy which has heretofore been <br />adopted by the City Council is entitled to be refunded the following taxes erroneously charged <br />against her. <br /> <br />Year Erroneous Value Tax <br /> <br />Penalty Interest Total <br /> <br />1921 $ 250.O0 $ 5'25 $ 5.25 <br />1922 250.00 5.25 <br /> 5.25 <br />19~ ~5o.o0 5.~5 <br />19~ 50.00 5.~5 5.25 <br />192~ 250.00 5.62 5.~5 <br />192~ ~5o.oo 6.~5 5.6~ <br /> 6.25 <br />1927 250.00 6.75 <br />1929 250.00 6.62 $ .33 $ 1.SS 8.80 <br />1930 250.00 6.62 .3 <br />1931 790.00 20.R~ 1.0~ 2.82 9.87 <br /> 5.60 ~7.58 <br />193~ 790.00 ~o.9~ 3.95 ~.8o ~9.~9 <br />1933 79o..oo ~o.9~ 3..95 ~.8o ~9.69 <br />193~ 79o.oo ~o.9~ 3.95 5.o~ <br /> <br />She is <br /> <br />Total $ 181.80 <br /> <br />entitled to have relieved the following: <br /> <br />Tax <br /> <br />Erroneous Value <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />193~ $ 790.00 $ 20.93 $ 20.93 <br />193~ 790,00 20.93 2o.93 <br />193~ 790.00 19.75 19.75 <br />1938 790~00 19.75 .. 19.7~ <br /> <br /> Total $ 80.36 <br /> The amount of the refund should be applied to the payment of he~ taxes for <br />the years 19~5 to 193~ inclusive." <br /> <br /> The Oity Eomager suggested that this ma~$er go over until the next meeting <br />of ~he Council, in order that he and theOity Attorney might -have an opportunity to view the <br />premises. <br /> Motion that the matter be referred backto t.heOity M~mager and Oity Attorney, <br />as suggested, was adopted. <br /> <br />sented. <br />f~s in <br /> <br /> Bill 'of J. Shirley Hope, amount $285.00, for killing tagless dogs, was pre - <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Hutohins that the Treasurer be authorized to pay same from <br />her hands from collection of Dog taxes, was adopted. <br /> <br /> <br />