Laserfiche WebLink
Inclosed - <br /> <br /> "The Portsmouth-City School Board at its meetingon Thursday, October 22, 1953, awarded <br />the con~racz for the Westhaven School Annex' on Base Bid of $457,876.00 to Thorington Construction <br />Company of Richmond, Virginia, low bidder; saidaward beingsubject To approval by appropriate <br />Federal Agencies and further subject to approyal by City Council of Portsmouth, Virginia, and award <br />to become effective when so approved. The School Board of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, and <br />the City Council of Portsmouth, Virginia, will assume the additional costs over and above the <br />Federal allotment occasioned by awarding the contract in this amount. <br /> <br /> The School Board hereby requests your approval of this contract. <br /> <br />Base bid <br />Contingencies <br />Fees <br /> <br />Total cost of Construction <br /> <br />Federal Funds under P.L. 815 <br /> <br />Amount requested from City for <br /> <br /> construction <br /> <br />$ 457,876.00 <br /> 15,000.00 <br /> 27,472,56 <br /> <br />$ 500,348.56 <br /> <br />278,814.00 <br /> <br />221,534.56 <br /> <br />grounds." <br /> <br />Amount requested from City for <br /> equipment . 28,465.44 <br />Total requested from City $ 2~0,000.00 <br />The above amount does not include cost of additional land required and improvement to <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Houghton to place an appropriation of $250:000.00 from Utility Tax Fund <br />for said purpose, on first reading, was adopted. <br /> <br /> 2nd - "I submit bids <br />the contract be awarded to the lowest bidder." <br /> <br />for altering pumping station at Godwin Street, and recommend that <br /> <br /> Motion of PAr. Hawks' to con-cur in the recommendation of the City Manager and that the <br />contract be awarded To the low bidder, Whitlock-Dunn, was adopted. <br /> <br /> 3rd - "I submit the attached letter from the Executive Secretary of the League of Vir- <br />ginia Municipalities, to which is attached a legislative program of the Virginia League, and recommend that a <br />meeting be held, at which time our representatives in the Legislature be invited to attend to discuss legislation <br />a~fecting the cities and towns in the State." <br /> <br />The Council decided to meet at 8:00 P.M., on November 17th. <br /> <br /> 4th - '~t a previous meeting of the Council, I was requested to confer with the League <br />of Virginia Municipalities concerning the proposed xncrease in the rates charged for electric energy by the Vir- <br />ginia Electric and Power Company. Please be advised that I have consulted the League's Executive Secretary and I <br />am attaching his reply hereto." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Bilisoly that the City Manager attend t~e State Corporation Commission's <br />hearing on November 10th, 1953, to oppose the rate increase requested by the Virginia Electric & Power Company, <br />was adopted. <br /> <br /> 5th - "I am submitting the attached list showing the date of resolution and the loca- <br /> tion and number of fire hydrauts authorized ~o be installed in Norfolk County. <br /> <br /> It is my understanding that since the contract with the County expired on Sept- <br />ember 30, 1953, that the City is no longer obligated to extend water mains aud fire hydrants iu the County beyond <br />those requested prior to the expiration of the contract. <br /> <br /> I therefore recommend that the Water Department refrain from extending water <br />mains and installing fire hydrants in Norfolk County except where the full cost of the im~allations is paid either <br />by the County or an individual or corporation." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Hawks to concur in the recommendation of the City Manager and that no more <br />fire hydrants already authorized by the Board of Supervisors be installed until a new water con~ract has been <br />signed with Norfolk County, was adopted. <br /> <br /> 6th - "I submit for your consideration, the attached letter from James G Mitchell, <br />Secretary of the Citizens' Protective Committee:" <br /> <br />'We, of the Portsmouth Citizens' Protective Committee, wish to take this opportunity <br />To remind you and the gentlemen of City Council of your promise, made orally the <br />evening of April 14, 1953, that ample public notice would be given the citizens of <br />Portsmouth for a hearing, should the local Redevelopmen~ and Housing Authority seek <br />Council's approval of any plans for anew civic center that they might present. <br />We request that .this letter be read at the next regular session of the City Council <br />and ~rust that it will be happy to renew this promise, irrespective of any public <br />hearing that may be accorded by the Planning Commission. It is further requested <br />that a written reply be received from you regarding this matter. <br />I~t might be well t~ poiiIt ~out tha~ our c~iginal position has not changed fundament- <br />ally as to the.ciwic cen~er proposed by-the Authority. To quote from a statement <br />made to the newspapers by Alher~ M. Cole, Federal Houslug Administrator, it might <br />be well to call your attention that "it will never enjoy strong public support if it <br />rests on mere willingness of cities t~ accep~ their share of Federal largesse if it <br />is offered." ~ <br /> <br />On motion filed. <br /> <br /> <br />