Laserfiche WebLink
~a~ua~V 24th, 1956. <br /> <br />ina the. establishment of a ReEional Control Center-or Centers in the Tidewater area. This is. for your considera- <br />tion. I recommend that a study of such a plan he made immediately and that the funds in the hands of the <br />Treasurer be used to defray the cost o~ the preliminary plans." <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Howard to concur in the recommendation of the City Manager was adopted. <br /> <br /> 56-34 - ~'I SUlmL%~ the attached letter from the Peoples' National Bank, as well as a copy o£_.an <br />editorial which appeared in the New York Herald Tribune recently. <br /> I recommend that a resolution be adopted favoring the sup~ort of the Bricker Bill and <br />forwarded to Senators Byrd and Roberts. on, wi%h a request that they support and vote for the enactment of the <br />Bricker Bill into law." <br /> <br /> Motion of ~r. Howard that a resolution be forwarded to Senators Byr~ and Robertson, <br />supporting the Bricker Bill, allowing banks to participate in certain Types of revenue bonds, was adopted. <br /> <br />IR~F~IN ISBED BUS LNESS <br /> <br /> 56-13 - An appropriation of $7,000.06 £rom Utility Tax?und to purchase property at the south- <br />west corner of Butler smd A Streets, ~er~Ann Street Schoel site, placed on first reading at last meeting, was <br />taken up.. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Howard to appropriate $7,000.00 for said purpose was adopted, and by <br /> <br />the following ~ote: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br /> Duke, Baker, Bilisoly, Grimes, <br /> Warren, Wilson <br />None <br /> <br />56-17 - The following letter from the Superintendent of Schools laid on table at lasl meeting, <br /> <br />was taken up: <br /> <br /> "The School Board at its meeting on Friday, January 6, 1956, instractedme to request <br />the City to purchase, for use as part of the Truxton School site, all those lots fronting on ~anley St. between <br />'G' and Lee Streets, as shown on Pla~e 151 ef the Portsmouth land books. The total assessed value of these lots <br />is $2,800." <br /> <br />Motion of ~ir. Grimes to refer to the City Manager for further report, was adopted. <br /> <br />NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br /> 56-35 - Motion of Mr. Howard that the following men nominated for members of the Portsmouth <br />Port Commission be elected and for the following terms, was adopted: <br /> <br />Henry W. ~zcKenzie <br />Charles R. Lively <br />Albert C. Bartlett <br />George T. Ewell <br />~aurice Gompf <br /> <br />Two years <br />Three years <br /> <br />Five years <br /> <br />56-36 - The following letter from the City Collector was read: <br /> <br /> "I find tke following tax accounts on the books of the City of Portsmouth and these <br />accounts should Be removed from the hooks for the reasons and in the ~aounts indicated below: <br /> 1. Property acquired by the Portsmouth Redevelopment and HeusinE Authority on which they <br />paid'all taxes up to the date of purchase: <br /> Year 1953 $11.25 <br /> Year 195~ 1415.37 <br /> Total 1426.62 <br /> <br />Property owned by the City of Portsmouth, Va.: <br /> <br />1954 $349.94 1946 93.76 <br />1953 100.02. I945 93.76 <br />1952 96.89 1944 93.76 <br />1951 93.76 1943 93.74 <br />1950 93.76 1942 93.74 <br />1949 93.76 1941 93.74 <br />1948 93.76 1940 93.74 <br />1947 93.76 1939 5~.56 <br /> <br />$1,723.45 <br /> <br />3. Proper~y o~ned by churches which is nat taxable - 1954 - ~L25~14." <br /> <br />Motion o~ ~r. Bilisely that the taxes be relieved, was adopted. <br /> <br />56-37 - The following letters from the Commissio~uer of Revenue were read: <br /> <br /> "Please be advised that Grace Houseman has been assessed for tangible personal property <br />valued at $1475.00, with taxes amounting to $40.56. Our investigation reveals that the correct assessment should <br />have been $785.00, with taxes amounting to $21.59, representing an overassessment in taxes amounting to $18.97. <br /> The taxpayer has paid the original tax ef $40.56 as evidenced by his receipted ~ax bill <br />be#7551'made ASto thethistaxpayer."is definitely an overpayment of $18.97, we sincerely request that a refund in the amount of $18.97~ <br /> <br /> <br />