Laserfiche WebLink
May 27th. 1957. <br /> <br />denied, but recommends that <br /> <br />Thomas D. Copeland ro rezone property located on the southeast corner of Watts <br />Ave. and Coltunbus Ave. fronting 50 feet on Columbus Ave. by 100 feet on Watts Ave.; <br />lots 23 and 24 of block 5. Application ~o rezone from 'C' Two Family Dwelling <br />District to 'F' Local Business District. <br />On the subject property there was situated a non-conforming use which has been de- <br />stroyed by fire.'The surrounding property is residential in character, is in the 'C' <br />Two Family Dwelling District, and this property ms considered to be suitable and <br />desirable for residential development. <br />T.F. Culpepper to rezone property located on the northwest corner of Rodm]an Ave. <br />and Columbia St., fronting 120 feet on Columbia.St. by 90 feet on Rod]nan Ave.; lots <br />2, 4, 6 and 8 of block 151. Application to rezone from 'C' Two Family Dwelling <br />District to 'E-i' Transitional District. <br /> <br />All property forjat least s block in each dSrection is in 'C' Two Family Dwelling <br />and 'B' Single Family use district. All surrounding property is developed for resi- <br />dential use. Approval of this property for Transitional use district would clearly <br />be in conflict with the statement of pzLVpose for this use district as set forth in <br />the zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />By unanimous vote the Planning Comm/ssion recommends that the following petition be <br />the entire Prentis Park area be considered~for re-zoning: <br /> <br /> 3. Ethel W. Stallings to rezone property located on the west side of Charleston Ave. <br />commending 29.5 feet south of Palmer St., fronting 50 feet on Charleston Ave. by 100 feet deep; lots 2 and 3 of <br />block 18. Application to rezone from 'B' Single Family District to 'C' Two Family District. <br /> This block and all of the surrounding blocks were placed in a 'B' Single Family Use <br />District when the zoning map was first adopted. However, there are numerous two-family dwellings scattered <br />through the area. Good zoning practice would not be to give individual preferential treatment for any single <br />owner. If this ares is suitable for two-family dwellings then the entire ares should be so zoned." <br /> <br />adopted. <br />was adopted. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Weiseman to approve the application of Alice Mason on first reading,was <br />Motion of Mr. Kirby to approve the application of William R. Lowe on first reading, <br /> <br />reading, was adopted. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Hinton to approve the application of the City of Portsmouth on first <br /> <br />~reading, was adopted. <br /> <br />Motion- of Mr. Baker to approve the application of Construction Associates on first <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Baker that Block A, bounded by Loudoun Ave., High St., King St., and <br />17-A by'pass.block W bounded by 17 A by-pass High St,, Vermont Ave~ and King St., block AA bounded by 17 A by-pass <br />King St., Vermont Ave., Airline Blvd., and County St., be approved on first reading rezoning, was adopted. <br /> <br /> James Overton, representing Thos.' D. Copeland, :spoke for Mr. Copeland's application <br />for rezoning. <br /> James W. Crump spoke for the rezoning. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Baker not to concur in the recommendation of the Planning Commission <br />and thaf Thomas D. Copeland's application for rezoning to F Local Business District be approved on first reading, <br />was adopted. <br /> Albert Cross spoke for the application of T. F.Culpepper. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Baker not to concur in the recommendation of the Planning Commission <br />and that T.F. Culpepper's'application for rezoning no E-1 Transitional District be approved on first reading, was <br />adopted. <br /> Ellis N. Stallings spoke for the application of Ethel W. Stallings. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Weiseman not to concur in the recommendation of the Planning Commission <br />and that the application of Ethel W. Stallings for rezoning to C-2 Family Dwelling District be approved on first <br />reading, was adopted. <br /> <br />57-187 -The City Clerk reported as follows for the Committee of the Whole: <br /> <br />"lst - That parking restrictions as recommended by Wilbur Smith and Associates <br /> be tabled at the present time. <br /> 2nd- That the following changes be made in the ordinance concerning one-way streets <br /> Section 30-132 - change Middle St. to read 'Dinwiddie St.' <br /> 30-139.4 -reference to North St. be omitted <br /> 30-139.5 - referer~e ~o Pine St. be ~mitted <br /> 30-140 - Change the words 'Second.Ave.' to read 'First Avenue'. <br /> 3rd - That the one way streets be effective 12:01 A.M. Monday, June 17th,1957." <br /> <br />was adopted. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Smith to concur in the recommen'dation of the Committee of the'Whole, <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Kirby to remove the following ordinance from the table, was adopted: <br /> <br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND RE-ORDAIN ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 30 OF THE CODE <br />OF.THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, 1951, RELATING TO ONE-WAY STREETS" <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Kirby to adopt the amendments as recommended by the Committee of the <br />Whole, was adopted. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Smith to amend the ordinance by deleting Sections 30-133.1, 30-133.2, <br />30-141, 30-14~.1, 30-141.2, which refer ro First and Second Avenues, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Avenues, was adopted <br />and by the following vote: <br /> <br /> <br />