Laserfiche WebLink
June lOth, 1958. <br /> <br />Department to investigate the economy ~f the proposed route and go study the question of whether the road could <br />be moved fi£ty or sixty £eet one way or the other. ' <br /> <br /> 58-183 - The following letter from Judge .W.~ .W. CasseI1 was read: <br /> <br /> "Mr. John ~. Porter, Jr., who has been named as Associate Judge is interested in servir <br />as Special Justice to handle lunacy commissions and it is, therefore, requested that he be named To fill the racer <br />cy created ~y the resignation of Donald H Sandie." <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Hinton to go into the election of a special justice, was adopted. <br />Mr. ~inton nominated John R. Por~er, Jr. ' <br /> <br />Notion of Mr. Weiseman that nominations b~ closed, was adopted. <br />Vote being taken, Mr. Porter was unanimously elected. <br /> <br />Rehabilitatio~ was read: <br /> <br />58-184 - The following letter from Paul A. Breeding, Area Supervisor of Vocational <br /> <br /> "This is to advise.you of a problem that we encounter from time to time in working <br />with disabled people in your City. Vocational Rehabilitation is s service of public education, the purpose of <br />which is to prepare for and adjust in appropriate 'trades or occupations persons of work age whose vocational op - <br />portunities are limited by reason of serious impairment or disability. Through individual case study and diagno- <br />sis, medical evsiuatinn, vocational counseling, physical restoration, vocational training, job placement and £ol - <br />low-up, the disabled person is able To overcome his handicap and become self-supporting. <br /> In recent years there has been a steady increase in the number of severely disabled <br />people brought To our attention. A large percentage of these p~ople are confined to their homes as a result of <br />orthopedic crippling conditions. Others are confined because of varying conditions resulting from disease, acci- <br />dent, or congenital deformity. Through comprehensive services many of these people can be placed in a limited <br />earning capacity in their homes whereas they could not under any circumstance enter competitive employment out- <br />side the home.. They are by and large indigent and no~ able to procure business license as per city ordinance. <br /> Vocational Rehabilitation funds are not allowable for ~his which therefore poses a <br />rather difficult problem. <br /> <br /> It would be appreciated if your council would consider this problem with the view of <br />granting waiver of the business license for those disabled citizens of your city that have been trained or that <br />are under the supervision of Vocational Rehabilitation. Your reaction will be appreciated." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Hinton to refer to the City Manager and City Attorney was adopted. <br /> <br />58-185 - The following petitions were read: <br /> <br /> "we, the undersigned, do hereby petition those in authority To reconsider the re- <br />routing of the ~ark View buses in that there has resulted not only an extreme inconvenience on the part of the <br />bus patron but even more so has created s direct hardship on the par~ of the nearly one hundred merchants, pro - <br />fessional men, restaurants and the like doing business between Chestnut and Court Sts. <br /> The Park View line formerly came sout~ on Effingham St. and made a left turn on to <br />High Street proceeding east. The route now followed runs east on North St. to Court and then on to High St. The <br />new route eliminates the convenience for those desiring to go to the Telephone Company, the many stores in the <br />former area covered, the Professional Building, the Bank of Virginia, and other important business locations. <br /> Many persons using the Park View line have indicated their displeasure and their desi~ <br />to see the former route reinstated. We are sure that those persons responsible for making the change in question <br />were not aware of the effect that such a re-routing would have on the business community. We, therefore, request <br />an immediate consideration o£ the peti'tion to designate the Park View bus route to again run south on Ef£ingham <br />To High and then left on High proceeding east. (Signed) Jack Sheel, 735 High St., Bradshaw- Diehl, Inc." <br /> <br /> and numerous others." <br /> <br /> "We, the undersigned, respectfully submit s request that the Portsmouth Transit Com- <br />pany resume the bus service on Emmett St. (Signed) George W. Cain, 719 Emmett ~T. an nu~ rous others. <br /> <br /> Motion of Nr. Weiseman that these petitions be referred to the Public Transportation <br />Committee, was adopted. <br /> Mr. Smith requested that the committee study the placing o£ both the Park View and <br />West Park View lines back as originally routed, as this is the only proper way ~o serve the citizens. <br /> <br /> 58-186 - The followzng letter from the Planning Commission was read: <br /> <br /> "Pursuant to the public hearing held by the Virginia State Highway Commission on June <br />3, 1958, at which plans were presented for Federal Interstate Route No. 64, Bowers Hill ~o the ~ or£olk-Ports- <br />mouth B~idge tunnel~ the Planning Commission unanimously passed the followzng motion at a meeting held on June 5, <br />1958: <br /> To recommend To City Council that request be made <br /> to provide and construct an interchange and connection from Federal Interstate Route ~o.64 <br /> across the Seaboard Airline Railroad yards to High St. <br /> The proposed connectinn , which is east of the Norfolk-Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad,I <br />is shown in the Preliminary Design Report on drawings Nos. B3 and B44. <br /> It is the recommendation ~f the Planning Commission that.this interchange and connec-~ <br />tion be incorporated in the final plans and constructed at the same time that the interstate spur is built. Other- <br />wise there will be no direct connection ~o High St., from the interstate highway between Frederick Boulevard['~nd <br />Chestnut St., a distance of approximately 1.6 miles. <br /> <br /> It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the proposed connection is essen - <br />rial if adequate traffic distribution and access is to be provided into the City of Portsmouth. In addition, it <br />can be located so as to connect with the proposed second tunnel, at the same time providing highway access neces- <br />sary for the future industrial development of Pinners Point." <br /> <br /> <br />