My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 03/10/1959
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1950s
>
Year 1959
>
Minutes 03/10/1959
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2001 4:40:26 PM
Creation date
12/14/2001 4:39:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
3/10/1959
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 10th. 1959. <br /> <br /> I recommend that we send City personnel to Norfolk ~o study and observe Norfolk's <br />operation in reversing the flow of traffic on City streets in that City." <br /> <br />adopted. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Breedlove to suspend the rules to hear from interested persons, was <br />The following spoke: <br /> <br /> C.M.Davenpor~ James ~¥illey <br /> Von L Piersall W H King <br />Walter Tiffany (for C~ffee's Bakery) Marian E. Tuttle <br />G.L. Cox <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Bartlett to concur in the recommendation of the City Manager, was adopted <br />without dissenting vote. <br /> <br /> 59-64 - "The Portsmouth Industrial Commission has requested permission ro re-allocate <br />a portion of the funds appropriated by the City for Kndustrial Advertisement. <br /> They are requesting the use of the $700.00 budgeted for the National Indus - <br />trial Development Exposition in New York to be used in advertisement in the Ledger-Star. The Ledger-Star is <br /> o <br /> <br />plarining to publish an 8 ~o 12 page section of Industrial appreciation about March 20th, 1959, at the request f <br />the Portsmouth Industrial Commission. <br /> I recommend that this re-allocation of fun~s be approved." <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Weisemau to concur in the recommendation of the City Manager was adopted, <br />without dissenting vote. <br /> <br /> 59-65 - "I am submitting the following resolution and reconmlend its adoption. This <br />resolution is mn opposition to a Bill inIroduced in Congress. The Bill HR 5096 would for the first time place <br />a federal tax on the interesz from bonds issued by local public housing agencies. <br /> This would increase the amount of interest that would have ro be paid for <br />housing bonds; thereby creating greater federal sbusidy in the future to keep rents low in public housing for <br />low income families. <br /> In previous attempts by Congress to tax local bonds, exper~ testimony esti - <br />mated that federal taxation of municipal securities would increase the cost of municipal borrowing by higher <br />interest rates of one ro one and one-fourth per cen~ per annum. <br /> The basic reason for opposing this Bill is that it would establish a most <br />dangerous precedent of allowing the federal government ~o control local governmen~ through the power to tax. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Breedlove to table was lost. <br /> <br />On motion of Mr. Smith, the following resolution was adopted, and by the following vote: <br /> <br />"WHEREAS, it has been proposed in the Congress of the United States that municipal <br />housing authority bonds be subjected to taxation by the federal government, and <br />WHEREAS, if adopted, this proposal would be the beginning of s movemen~ to subject <br />all municipal and s~ate securities ~o federal taxation, thereby greatly hampering <br />the undertaking and accomplishment of local projects and purposes, con~ra To consti- <br />tutional principles and the announced desire of the federal government To promote <br />greater local responsibil±ty and participation in publi~ works, <br />NOW, I~IEEEFORE, Be it Resolved hy the Council of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, <br />tha~ taX~tio~ by the federal government of any type of municipal or state security <br />would constitute an unwarranted and unconstitntional impedimen~ ~o accomplishment <br />of the purposes of local government; that any proposal in the Congress ~o subject <br />municipal or state securities to federal taxation should be opposed vigorously; and <br />that a certified copy of these resolutions be sent by the City Clerk To the Congress- <br />man and Senators representing the people of this City in the Cor%gress." <br /> <br />Ayes: Baker, Bartlett~ Breedlove~ Seward, Sm~th,Weiseman <br />Nays: W~lker <br /> <br /> 59-66 - "The City-o~wned proper~y at 528 Queen St. was auctioned on March 9th, 1959. <br />There was only one bid in the amonn~ of $15,000.00. I recommend that we do not accept this bid. <br /> <br />Motion of Mr. Smith ~o suspend the rules To hear from interested persons, was adopted. <br /> <br />Mr. J. J. Kirchmier spoke. <br /> <br />dissenting yore. <br /> <br />Motion of Mir. Smith To table until the nex~ meeting of the Council was adopted, without <br /> <br />59-67 - "The following resolution was presented by the City Manager: <br /> <br /> "RESOLVED that the per diem compensation to be paid the three mergoers <br />of the Board of Equalization To be appointed by the Court of Hustings <br />in colmection with the quadrennial assessmen~ recently completed shall <br />be $40.00 per man per eight hour day, for a period not to exceed Ten days, <br />unless prior~authorizatipn therefor shall have been given by the Council." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Weiseman, said resolution was adopted, without dissenting vo~e. <br /> 59-68 - "The following 'notice' was read by' the City Manager: <br /> <br /> "The Penms~lvania Railroad Company has applied to the State Corporatinn Commission of <br />Virginia for authority To transfer its Portsmouth operation To Norfolk, and to consolidate its Portsmouth and <br />Norfolk agencies and to perform ail agency functions at Norfolk,Va. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.