|
30·
<br />
<br />Augus~ 25th, 1959
<br />
<br />and read:
<br />
<br />and read:
<br />
<br />and read:
<br />
<br />ing, was taken ap.
<br />
<br /> 59-211 - "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 30r138 AND 30-142.2 OF THE CODE
<br /> OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1951, AS A~ENDED, RELATING
<br /> TO ONE-WAY TRAFFIC ON CERTAIN PORTIONS OF LONDON STREET AND WATER
<br /> STREET"
<br />· 59-211.1 - Page 302
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Breedlove, said ordinance was adopted, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Baker, Breedlove, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br />59- 212 - The following ordinance, placed on first reading at last meeting, was taken up
<br />
<br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS NECESSARY FOR OPRATION OF THE CITY
<br /> GOVERNMENT FOR AND DURING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1959"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Breedlove, said ordinance was adopted, and by the following vo~e:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Baker, Breedlove, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br />The.following ordinance, placed on first reading at last meeting, was taken up
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $252,800.00 FROM THE GENERAL CAPITAL
<br /> IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR THE PURPOSES OF DRAINAGE-CURBSAND GUTTERS
<br /> AND AUTO~TIVE EQUIPMENT"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Breedlove, said ordinance was adopted, and by the following
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Baker, Breedlov~, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br />59-215 - The.following ordinance,
<br />
<br /> placed on first reading at last meeting, was taken up
<br />
<br />"AK ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE VIII OF CHAPTER 8 OF the CODE OF THE
<br />CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1951, ~4S A~ENDED, CONSISTING OF SECTIONS
<br />8-78 THROUGH 8~86, INCLUSIVE, SO AS TO REPEAL THE ORDINANCE ADOPTED ON
<br />NAY 26, 1959, IMPOSING A TAX ON ALL TOBACCO PRODUCTS, AND SI~UJLTANEOUSLY
<br />TO RE-ENACT THE ORDIN~tNCE THERETOFORE IN-EFFECT TAXING THE SALE OF
<br />CIGARETTES, EFFECTIVE AT-12~01 A.M., SEPTEMBER 1, 1959."
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Smith, said ordinance was adopted, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Baker, Breedlove, Seward, Smith, Walker, Weiseman
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br />59-216 - Refund of $11.00 to Robert G. Appenzeller, placed on first reading at last meet-
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Breedlove, said appropriation was made, without dissenting vo~e.
<br />
<br />NEW BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> 59-225 - The following letter from A.J. Mapp, Superintenden~ of Schools, was read:
<br />
<br /> "The School Board passed the following resolution at its meeting of August 13th and
<br />respectfully requests that you give your approval at the ~arties~ Possible date:
<br />
<br /> RESOLUTION
<br />WHEtkEAS, there i s some question as ~o whether the title to the
<br />Port Norfolk School proper~y located on Maryland Avenue, resides
<br />mn the School Board or City, the School B~ard respectfully re -
<br />quests the City to give a quit claim deed to the School Board in
<br />order that this property may be disposed of in the manner most
<br />advantageous to the City."
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Weiseman to refer to the City Manager and City Attorney was adopted,
<br />without dissenting vote.
<br />
<br />59-226 - The following letter from the Planning Director was read:
<br />
<br /> "The Planning Commission, at a meeting held Thursday, August 20th, 1959, moved that
<br />the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the proper resolution be drawn pointing out the fact
<br />that the present plans for the Interstate Highway do no~ prqvide adequate access ~o the down~own business section
<br />of Portsmouth and that further consideration be given this matter.
<br />
<br /> It is recommended that this resolution be presented ro the Highway Commission with a
<br />copy to Mr. Rawls, the Commissioner from this District and also to appropriate officials."
<br />
<br />The C%ty Manager read the following resolution:
<br />
<br />"WHEREAS, the preliminary design report for Federal Interstate Route
<br />Nmmber 64 from Bowers Hill to the Norfolk-Portsmouth Bridge Tunnel, as
<br />p~epared by the consulting engineers, in the opinion of the Plm%ning
<br />Co~mission of the City of Portsmouth and other interested officials
<br />and bodies, does not provide adequate or convenient egress from the
<br />
<br />
<br />
|