|
dissenting rose.
<br />
<br />November 10, 1964
<br />
<br />Motion of:Mr. Barm~g 5o concur in'the'recommendation o~ the City Manager was adopted without
<br />
<br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> 64r277 .r.~he following ordinance, approved on first reading at-last, meeting, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $6,000.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND FOR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL AND
<br /> E©UIP~ENT-FOR THE COURT OF HUSTINGS"
<br />
<br /> O~ motion of Mr-. Leafy the ordinance~was adopted, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Smith, Barnes, Dillon, Eastes, Johnsen, KRight, Leafy
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 64-278 -~ The follow-lng, ordinance approved, on first reading at last,meeting was,~taken up and read:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO A~END THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA,,1961, BY REPEALING SECTION
<br />18=54 THEREOF, PERTAININ~ TO REPO~TOF BLOOD ANALYSIS; BY AMENDING SECTIONS 18-1, 18-27, 18-32,
<br />18-41, 18-43, 18-46, 18-48.: 18-53, 18~57, 18~65, 18-137, 18-201. 18-202, 18-208, 18-~46 AND 18-249,
<br />PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TRAFFIC AND MOTOR VEHICLES, SECTIONS 19-8, 19-22, 19-51, 19-52
<br /> AND~ 19-68', PERTAtNING~T&WEARING OF ~ERTAIN E~BLEMS, DRUNKENNESS, SWEARING, USE OF INDECENT
<br /> LANGUAGE OVER THE TELEPHONE AND SUNDAY OBSERVANCE, RESPECTIVELY; AND BY ADDING THERETO SECTIONS
<br /> 18-33.1 AND 18-43 1, PERTAINING TO OPERATION OF A TRACTOR AND FAILING TO STOP RESPECTIVELY"
<br />
<br />On motion of Mr. Knight, the ordinance was~adopted and by the following vote:
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Smith, Barnes, Dillon, Eastes, Johnson, Knight, Leary
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br /> NEW"BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> 64-296 ~ The following letter from the P~nnning Director was read:
<br />
<br /> At its regular monthly meeting on November 3, 1964, the City P~nni~g Commission conducted s
<br /> public hearing on and acted upon the following rezoning applications:
<br /> Z-64-29 - Petition of George T. ~cLean to rezone a parcel 175 feet north of the northwest corner
<br /> of Victory Boulevard and Gust Lane; from Commercial C-2 5o Industrial M-1. Sincerthis merely involves extending
<br /> the Industrial M-1 district along Victory Boulevard ~o the west, the Planning Commission unanimously resolved
<br /> 5o recommend approval of the application.
<br />
<br /> Z-64-30 - Petition of the City Planning Commission by the Planning Director to rezone property
<br /> bounded on the north by ~allsrd Avenue, ess5 by the P~I.F. Industrial Park, south by InterssaEe 264, and west
<br /> by Adamson Strees; from Industrial M-1 to Residential R-75-S. After ex~ensive studies and surveys extending back
<br /> almost five years when this ares became part of the City of Portsmouth~ the Planning Commission ~n recognition of
<br /> the desire of residen~ citizens recommends approval of this application.
<br />
<br /> Z-64-31 - Petition of the City Planning Commission by the Planing Director 5o rezone property
<br /> bounded on the north by Roosevel~ Boulevard and Horne Avenue, eas~ by Stratford Street, south by Warfield Avenue
<br /> properties, and west by corporate city limits and Cavalier Boulevard; from Residential R-60 to Residential R-r5.
<br /> Restudy and extensive subdivision experience in the area since adoption of the Portsmouth Zoning Ordinance of
<br /> ~ay, 1961, prompted the Planning Commission to reconsider this Residential R-60 as inappropriate and ~o recommend
<br /> in the total absence of any disagreement approval of the application.
<br /> Z-64-32 - Petition of the City of Portsmouth by the City Manager 5o rezone property bounded by
<br /> Seaboard Avenue, Spencer Street, Pinner Avenue, and the Portsmouth Sewage Treatmen~ Plant; from Residential R-75
<br /> to Industrial M-2. Since this proper~y owned by the City of Portsmouth is adjacenE 5o the municipal sewage
<br /> treatment plant and in the unanimous opinion of the Planning Commission should be classified Industrial
<br /> it ~s recommended that the application be approved. '
<br />
<br /> Z-64-33 - Petition of the Mike Ventura Estate by Agen5 Irvin Cohen ~o rezone a parcel beginnin~ 165
<br />feet west of the~est corner of Lincoln Street and Chestnut Street, along Lincoln Street to Laurel Avenue proper-
<br />ties, thence to Randolph Street, thence to Chestnut Street, thence to property fronting Lincoln Street; from
<br />Residential R-60 to Industrial M-2 and Commercial C-1 (sub-areas not specified). The Planning Commission unanimomsl
<br />
<br /> Z-64-36 - Petition of Agent Jefferson B. Brows to rezone seven lots fronting the south side
<br />of Frederick Boulevard between Interssate 264 and Bagley Street; from Residential ~-75 ~o Commercial C-1. After
<br />careful study of various land use and traffic factors, the Planning Commission recommends approval for Commercial
<br />C-1. See below for further commen~ on a ma~ter related to this petition.
<br />
<br /> Z-64-~3 - REFERRAL FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST l~ 1964; the Planning Commission also
<br />reviewed again rezoning petition Z-64-23, an earlisr application relative to four of the seven lots requesting
<br />Commercial C-2, which City Council referred back for additional s~udy and the submission of additional information
<br />fro~ the application. Again, the Planning Commission resolved ~o recommend disapproval. Action noted abo~e on
<br />Z-64-36 is viewed by the Planning Commission as an acceptable substituse for the earlier application and more in
<br />line with the best interests of the City of Portsmouth."
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr. Barnes to suspend the rules to hear from Irvin&Cohen, was adopted.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|