My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 06/08/1965
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1960s
>
Year 1965
>
Minutes 06/08/1965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2001 3:23:39 PM
Creation date
10/17/2001 3:22:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
6/8/1965
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> <br />June 8th, 1965 <br /> <br /> In the preparation of this budget each municipal function was carefully <br />reviewed a§ to Past and present fiscal experience before any increase in appropriation was allowed. Strict <br />attention was also oaid to resources available to finance the costs involved. <br /> <br /> It was apparent during reviews that denartmental requests would raise <br />costs of city government in Portsmouth by an amount w~ich was disproportionate_to ~evenue sources that included <br />a sales tax. It was necessary for some $1,184,59] worth of departmental requests to be eliminated from the General <br />and Capital Funds. Even with this amount eliminated the proposed budget is increased by $1,260,725 over the current <br />budget. These increases will be discussed in the second part of this message with an explanation of revenues in the <br />first part. <br /> <br />Part I. <br /> <br /> Revenue estimates for 1965-66 amount to $16,857,381. These estimates <br />exceed 1964-65 revenues by $1,251,857 even though there is estimated from the sales tax the amount of $1,900,000. <br />!~hile the sales tax revenue shows a substantially larger amount than the increase in the budget, this is explained <br />by the reduction of $575,000 from the amount of funds being taken from the Water Fund and a S275,000 non-recurring <br />item in the 1964-65 budget from highway funds. These revenue estimates also take into consideration the elimination <br />of the household personal property tax which amounts to approximately $540,000. It is believed that the elimination <br />of the household property tax is a forward step and in line with action taken in other cities in Virginia. This <br />tax cannot be fairly assessed and is difficult to collect as it is assessed in January but not due and payable until <br />November. While many cities in Virginia have a higher tax rate on personal property, only Portsmouth has a lower <br />rate than the real estate tax rate. These revenue estimates anticipate amending the personal property tax rate <br />to $5, the same as the real estate rate. The City Council has already taken action to accomplish this by amending <br />the tax ordinance when the sales tax ordinance ~as adopted. <br /> <br /> In reviewing our revenue sources, the real estate tax rate, business <br />and professional licenses, other taxes and service charges were stud~ed and it is found that Portsmouth is <br />comparable to other Virginia cities, particularly the cities in Tidewater. It was concluded that the city could <br />or should not get too far out of line with the surrounding area in its cha~ges; therefore, this leaves the sales tax <br />as the only available source for additional revenue and is estimated in this budget at $1,900,000. <br /> <br /> The revenue estimates that have any adjustments of any substantial <br />amount are as follows: <br /> <br />Real Estate $ 160,000 plus <br /> <br />in building construction. <br /> <br />This is an adjustment in Public Service Corporations and normal increase <br /> <br />Personal Property <br /> <br />550,000 minus <br /> <br />adjustment above of Public Service taxes. <br /> <br />This reflects the elimination of household personal property and <br /> <br />Sales Tax $1,900,000 plus <br /> <br />Based on a 2% tax with a $4 limit, the same as the City of Norfolk. <br /> <br />Public Assistance Grants $ 227,617 plus <br /> <br />the increase in reflected in expenses. <br /> <br />These are funds received from the Federal and State governments and <br /> <br />School - General Appropriation $ 124,000 plus <br /> <br />Additional funds estimated to be received from State for school <br /> <br />operation. <br /> <br />Public Law 874 - Schools S 80,000 minus <br /> <br />It is estimated that the City will receive this much less from the <br /> <br />Federal Government. <br /> <br />Transfer from ~ater Fund $ 575,000 minus <br /> <br />expansion. <br /> <br />but have not been dealt with here. <br /> <br />More funds are being left in the Water 'Fund to pay for current capital <br /> <br />There are many other minor revenue items that wilt~ show fluctuations <br /> <br />Part II <br /> <br />largely in the following: <br /> <br />The appropriations show ,an increase of $1,260,723 which is reflected <br /> <br />Schools $ 558,374 <br />Health Department 24,468 <br />Police ;57,574 <br />Fire 83,305 <br />Social Service 190,733 <br />Debt Service 77,625 <br /> <br />The proposed school budget provides for an increase to all personnel <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.