My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 02/09/1971
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970s
>
Year 1971
>
Minutes 02/09/1971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2001 2:22:31 PM
Creation date
10/15/2001 2:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
2/9/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 9, 197]. <br /> <br />owned buildings are also charged at the Fire Department. Extinguishers located in the Ports~ <br />mouth Public Schools are maintained through their maintenance facilities. <br /> <br /> Although this operation was originally established primarily as a public service at <br />a break-even financial consideration, it has produced results directly opposite from those <br />envisioned. Even servicing only three basic types of extinguishers, many parts are not inter <br />changeable from one extinguisher to another of differing manufacturer's models, and, therefor <br />many parts have to be duplicated in stock to perform any semblance of effective service. <br />Many times parts are not available at all. <br /> <br /> As these three types of extinguishers require hydrostatic testing every five years at <br />pressures up to 375 pounds, containers are often ruptured when this test is applied. Since <br />these tests are performed by Fire Department personnel, our Fire Department is severely criti <br />cized when this happens. We are accused of damaging extinguishers and robbing citizens of <br />protection afforded them through loss of an extinguisher or financial loss due to having <br />to purchase another unit. Citizens do not like to be told that the type of fire extinguisher <br />which they have has become obsolete, that parts are no longer available for them, and that <br />they cannot be repaired. <br /> <br /> The soda ash, the soda acid and the foam extinguishers are fastly becoming obsolete. <br />We have no facilities at all to recharge carbon dioxide extinguishers. Neither do we have <br />facilities for repairing or testing of these extinguishers. Rxtinguishers of this type owned <br />and operated b7 the City of Portsmouth are recharged, repaired and tested through the faci-: <br />lities of private fire equipment service agencies. An agency of this type nearest to us is <br />located in Norfolk. <br /> <br /> We estimate that facilities necessary for recharging, repairing and testing these carbon <br />dioxide extinguishers would cost an estimated $25,000 plus an annual expenditure of $1,500 <br />to $2,000 for materials and supplies. We would also incur cost in training personnel to <br />perform this work. Those performing the duties would have to be certified and the procedures <br />would have to comply with various federal and state regulations and codes applicable to comer <br />pressed gas operation. Many fire equipment service agencies provide a mobile service for <br />this type of unit. This is desirable, particularly for business and institutional establish- <br />ments. To add this service, we are estimating that an additional $10,000 would be needed. <br />We are phasing out carbon dioxide extinguishers for City use as rapidly as possible. <br /> <br /> A very basic type of extinguisher in wide use today is the dry chemical extinguisher. <br />As in other types of extinguishers, there are many, many manufacturers of the dry chemical <br />extinguisher with many models to choose from. These units are available using many different <br />types of extinguishing agents and many different modes of operation. Some of these units <br />use as their expellant power-compressed air, others require compressed nitrogen. Many requir. <br />small compressed carbon dioxide cylinders, some even require compressed air or compressed <br />nitrogen cartridges instead of free gases pumped into the extinguisher shell. Equipment <br />for testing the many makes and models of this dry chemical extinguisher is necessarily varied <br /> <br /> We have many units of this type in service by the City of Portsmouth and we do recharge <br />these units; however, we are able to control the above-mentioned problems through strict <br />standardization of the units bought by the City. We have such units tested by a servicing <br />agency. <br /> <br /> The expense and problems involved in attempting to service this type of unit for the <br />general public is quite apparent. The types mentioned above are a very few of the many types <br />of extinguishers in wide usage in our City as well as cities throughout the country. <br /> <br /> Because of the many complex problems involved in servicing fire extinguishers of so <br />many makes, models and types, it is felt that a professional fire equipment servicing agency <br />can perform this service to business establishments and citizens at a much lower cost and <br />more efficiently than we would be able to do. These fire servicing agencies provide inspection <br />and maintenance on a regular scheduled basis. They also assume~'respo~sibility for the mainten- <br />ance of the units and maintenance of their service records. <br /> <br /> It is our feeling that most establishments having a requirement for extensive extinguish r <br />service would continue to receive this service under contract arrangements with a professiona <br />servicing unit. Were we to attempt to set up this type of service, it is highly possible <br />that the volume of this work would be far insufficient to justify the cost of performing <br />such a service. <br /> <br /> I recommend that our Fire Department continue servicing the three types of extinguishers <br />that they now service as long as parts are available, but that we do not attempt to enter <br />the business of operating a fire equipment servicing agency." <br /> <br />~F~. ':Irvine Smith made a motion to concur with!;the City Manager's report, and was adopted~ <br /> <br />~by t~ fO~iOwing vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, IrvinaSmith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes <br /> Nays: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Irvine Smith related that he would look into the possibility of having a firm of <br /> Norfolk satisfy the needs of Portsmouth requests. <br /> <br /> 71-51 - "I submit the attached agreement between Rocramac Enterprises, Senior Citizens <br />Village, Ltd.~ and t~he City of Portsmouth and recommend that the proper City officials be <br />authorized to sign. This is an easement for the construction of a sewer line to service <br />Senior Citizens Village across a water line easement of the Portsmouth Water Department. <br />This easement is located on Sportsman's Road in Nansemond County. This has been approved <br />by the City Attorney." <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.