D~r~mh~ 71 lqT1
<br />
<br /> "RESOLUTION APPOINTING VIEWERS FOR CLOSING A PORTION oF COLUMBIA STREET.
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, Lewis Chevrolet Corporation has made application to vacate and close the
<br />hereinafter described portion of a certain street and it appearing that notice of the appli-
<br />cation and request for the appointment of viewers was duly posted on December 9, 1971,
<br />on the bulletin board of the Court of HuStings for the City of Portsmouth, on the bulletin
<br />board of the Circuit Court of the City of portsmouth, and on the bulletin board of the
<br />Municipal Court of the City of Portsmouth.
<br />
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia,
<br />that Frank N. Bilisoly, Louis J. Leitner, L. A. Clark, Zalmon I. Blachman and F. J. Bergeron
<br />be appointed viewers to view the hereinafter described portion of such street and report
<br />to this Council in writing whether in their opinion, any and if any, what inconvenience
<br />would result from vacating and closing the following:
<br />
<br /> That portion Of Columbia Street which is bounded
<br /> on the West by the Western right of way line of
<br /> Columbia Street (formerly Eighth Avenue) and the
<br /> Eastern boundary line of Lot 33 as shown on the
<br /> Plat of Property of John J. Phillips, recorded in
<br /> the Clerk's Office of the Court of Hustings for
<br /> the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, in Map Book 2,
<br /> page 41; and bounded on the East by the Eastern
<br /> boundary line of Lot 71, as shown on said plat,
<br /> if extended from its Southeastern corner South
<br /> 55~ 30' East to the Southern right of way line ~
<br /> of Columbia Street."
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 71-577 "Bids were opened on December 16, 1971 fpr the sale of six City-owned lots
<br />in Pinners Point. One bid was received from Portsmouth Terminals, Inc. in the amount of
<br />$10,000. It is their plan to construct a maintenance building on this property to service
<br />the equipment used in the operation of the marine terminal.
<br />
<br /> I recommend the property be sold to Portsmouth Terminals, Inc."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr.
<br />Portsmouth Terminals,
<br />
<br />Ayes:
<br />Nays:
<br />
<br />Hotley, and seconded by Mr. Turner, the property to be sold to
<br />Inc., was adopted by the roll, lng vote:
<br />
<br />Holley, Johnson, King, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />None
<br />
<br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> 71-544 The following ordinance approved at the Public Hearing meeting, A~ld on
<br />December 6, 1971, was taken up and re~d:
<br />
<br />"ZONING AMENDMENT ORDINANCE Z 71-33"
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. King and seconded by Mr. Raymond Smith, the ordinance was adopted,
<br />and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, R~ymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />The following letter received from Director of Planning, was read:
<br />
<br /> "At its regular monthly meeting on December 7, 1971, the City Planning Commission
<br />received word that my communication of December 2, 1'971 relative to a proposed amendment
<br />of the Zoning Ordinance (see below) was returned for lack of a specific recommendation:
<br />
<br />PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: Consideration will be given to a proposal of
<br />the City Planning Commission that the Zoning Ordinance be amended by adding thereto
<br />a new section pertaining to denial of rezoning petitions by the Planning Director:
<br />
<br />S~ction 8-4.1 Petition Denial by Planning Director
<br />
<br />No petition for a zoning change shall be accepted by the Planning Director
<br />within one year of the final action by the City Council upon przor petition
<br />of the same owner concerning a zoning change on substantially the same
<br />parcel of land.
<br />
<br /> Since this was initiated and is described as a proposal of the City Planning Commission
<br />I failed to note the fact of a favorable recommendation. For this oversight, and the
<br />resultant misunderstanding, you have my apology. The Planning Commission does recommend
<br />that you consider this matter and would have you approve such an amendment to the Zoning
<br />Ordinance."
<br />
<br />
<br />
|