Laserfiche WebLink
"WE, the undersigned property owners and residents of the City of Portsmouth, respect- <br />fully request that the rezoning request for the property owned by Irving Duffen designated <br />as 221~~ County Street from M-1 fo C-2, and the application for a use permit utilization of <br />this structure for in-patient residence by Narcoties Addicts Rehabilitation C~nter Organi- <br />zati6n be approved for the following reasons: <br /> <br /> (a) This type of ~aci~ity is non-existent in Portsmout~ and is desperately needed; <br /> (b) A large proportion of the crime in Portsmouth is directly related to drugss <br /> ~nd NARCO is the best alternative to the drug problem in Portsmo~th,__.and Pprtsmouth <br /> residents are not allowed to be admitted to the Norfolk and ~hesa~ke mn resident <br /> program and therefore it is mandatory that we have our own facili~~ Signed <br /> <br />Gloria Ferrell, 121 Wainwright and others." (See Exhibit Z 72-25) <br /> <br /> Attorney Don gilgore spoke in opposition to Z 72-25 rezoning <br />ing petition: <br /> <br />and presented the follow- <br /> <br /> "W~, the undersigned property owners and residents of the. C~-i~y of Portsmouth, respect- <br />fully request'that the rezoning request for the property owned by Irving Duffen designated <br />as.2211 County Street from M-1 to C-2, and the application for a use permit to permit <br />utilization of this structure for in-patient residence by Narcotic Addicts Rehabilitation <br />Center Organization be denied for the following reasons: <br /> <br />The arena in question is now developed and used for business activities and <br />the proposed use of the facility as requested would adversely affect the present <br />and future operation of these businesses, <br /> <br />The proposed facility as requested would be better located in areas adjacent <br />or near to hospital, convalescent home and community service facilities, such <br />as within the Northside Redevelopment Project, and <br /> <br />The proposed rezoning and use permit application violates the City of Portsmouth <br />Comprehensive Plan dated January 1970. <br /> <br /> Our opposition to this rezoning and use permit application in no way should be con- <br />sidered as opposition to the aims, objectives and purposes of NARCO. Signed F.H. Miller <br />1117 Melvin Drive" (See Exhibit Z 72-25) ' <br /> <br /> Attomney Kilgore presented the following petition opposed to NARCO rezoning application:! <br /> <br /> "Pursuant to Section 8-1 of the Xoning Ordinance of the City of Portsmouth, we the <br />undersigned owners of 20% or more of the area of the lots within 309 feet ~f t~e bp~ndary <br />of the area of property now or formerly owned by Irving Duffen and Esther G. Duffen on the <br />South side of County Street, subject of the request for zoning ¢~gi~a~ion change and <br />issuance of use permit for NARCO, identified as application numbers Z-72-25 and U-72-3, here- <br />by protest against such change: Signed - V. L. Piersatl, Sr., and others" (See Exhibit <br />Z 72-25) <br /> <br />Mr. ~,' O~* Lewis, Lewis Chevrolet, spoke against. <br />Mrs. Lonnie T. Martin, 5217 W. High Street, spoke against. <br />Mr. Von Piersall, Sr., P & W Laundry, spoke agamnst. <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Molley and seconded by Mr. Turner, to concur <br />Commission and place on first reading, was defeated by the <br /> <br /> with the Planning <br />following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: M~lley <br />Nays: Johnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes <br /> <br />USE PERMIT 72-3 Irving and Esther G. Duffen <br /> <br />make <br />with <br /> <br />No action was taken since the preceding item Z 72-25 was defeated. <br /> <br />~Zoning Petition Z 72-4 Associated Churchland l~s~o.~s <br />See letter of Mr. Johns W. Ballard, III - following Z 72-5 <br />Rev. Ralph Reavis, representing the Black Urban De~elop~es, Inc. His position was <br />know to the Council that the Black Community of Twin ~ines desired no interference <br />the development of the area~i~-~ question (Z 72-4). <br /> <br />Attorney Don Dilgore spoke in favor of rezoning. <br /> <br />Mr. Joseph Preziotti, Planning Consu%tant for Baldwin & Gregg, spoke in favor. <br /> <br />Mr. Baldwin of Balwin & Gregg spoke in favor. <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />Mr. John Hardy of River Shores spoke in favor. <br /> <br />The following spoke against: <br /> <br />Mr. Frank L. Parks, Edgewood Park Mr. Benjamin Whitehurst, River Shores <br />Mr. Waiter T. H. Galliford, River Shores Mr. Dale Epley, River Shores <br />Mr. Do~ald Hobday, Edgefield Mr. Pierre Wilhite, River Shores <br />Dr. John Hollowei1, River Shores <br />Mr. Joseph Williams, Edgefield, presented the following petition: <br /> <br /> "We, the undersigned residents of the Churchland area, respectfully request that you <br />deny the petition of Associated Churchland Investors to rezone property at the northeast <br />corner of River Shore Road and Hedgerow Lane £rom Residential R-150 to Residential R-75 and <br /> <br /> <br />