April 2S, 1972
<br />
<br /> 72-I44 "I submit the attached ordinance and recommend it be placed on first read-
<br />ing. This amends the City Code to require flush grave markers in any new section of Olive
<br />Branch Cemetery.
<br />
<br /> Since the City is required to maintain the cemetery, the use of the flush markers will
<br />substantially reduce the cost of maintenance on the new sections."
<br />
<br /> Motimn of Mr. Johnson, and seconded by Mr. Raymond Smith,to defer action until the
<br />City Manager has had an opportunityt.~o confer with the City Ettorney and interested persons
<br />on areas of contention, on the following ordinance, hMJt~following vote:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1961,
<br />BY AMENDING SECTIONS 6-19, 6-21, 6-22 and 6-23 THEREOF'AND BY ADDING THERE-
<br />TO A NEW SECTION 6-23.1 PEF~INING TO CITY CEMETERIES, THEIR HOURS OF
<br />OPERATION AND REQUIRED GRAVE MARKERS."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />the
<br />
<br />Motion of Mr, Irvine Smith and seconded by Mr. King, an amendment to the motion that
<br />above ordinance be returned a~ May 25rd meeting, was adopted by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, I=vine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 72-14S "I submit the attached ordinance and recommend it be placed on first reading.
<br />This appropriates $6,S00 for the Sleepy Hole Recreation Park.
<br />
<br /> These funds are needed during this budget year to employ the Park Rangers and maintenanRe
<br />personnel to prepare for the opening of the park the first of July. It is also necessary
<br />to purchase equipment such as lawn mowers for maintenance."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Turner, and seconded by Mr. Irvine Smith, the following ordinance
<br />was approved on first reading, and:by the following vote:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $6,500.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO DEFRAY
<br />OPENING COSTS FOR SLEEPY HOLE PARK."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> ~2-146:~"I:.mu~bmit~.tke a~¢ached..Or~inandaand re~omme~d<it"~e..placeR on.first-reading.
<br />T~hiS:,appropriate§c$I40,O00~for!-th~' ~ri~R~ni~g of. High 'S.treet~W~s~! frem'Cedar. Lane to the by-
<br />
<br /> ~ile the ~sZerni~ection appears to cost substantialIy more than the eastern section,
<br />the following information is offered. Two conditions affect the prices of the two sections
<br />of roadway. These are the drainage requirements and the pavement design.
<br />
<br /> In the case of the eastern end, the drainage costs were about $25,600 whereas the drain
<br />age cost for the west end will be about $~4,800. The difference is due to the fact that
<br />the required pipe length for the western end is about 1,100 feet more than for the eastern
<br />end. Also, the pipe sizes are generally larger and at a greater depth.
<br />
<br /> In order that adequate funds for the drainage are provided, there has also been include
<br />an allowance for dewatering and sheet piling if required by ground conditions. This amount
<br />of $24,800 may not be needed. However, if it had not been included as a separate bid item,
<br />the contractor would have included all of this in his bid price for pipe installation. By
<br />using this method, we stand a good chance of saving a substantial part of the $24,800.
<br />
<br /> As to the paving design, the Engineering Department has proceeded on a more scientific
<br />way to arrive at the paving thickness required. It has been observed that the eastern end
<br />of the road is showing some signs of distress in parts and it is figured that it was poor
<br />long-range economy to build the western section with the same design as the eastern end.
<br />
<br /> Finally,~ the current request includes engineering design, costs for field inspections
<br />which will be done by the City's Engineering Department. There is also included with the
<br />above a percentage for contingencies which totals $19,975. These items were not included
<br />in the costs for the east end but were absorbed in the General Fund budget. This will allow
<br />the City to properly capitalize this project.
<br />
<br /> It is further recommended that the contract be awarded to Portsmouth Paving Company
<br />for the construction of this roadway."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Raymond Smith and seconded by Mr. King, the following ordinance was
<br />approved on first reading, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $140,000 FROM THE GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVBMEN~
<br />FUND FOR THE WIDENING OF~HIGH STREET WEST."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Holley, Johnson, King, Irvine Smith, Raymond Smith, Turner, Barnes
<br />Nays: NOne
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. lrvine Smith ~m~dseconded by Mr. Raymond Smith, Portsmouth Paving
<br />Company being low bidder, W~s awa~d~di:t~:~ca~r~e~ hy unanimous vote.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|