|
February 28~ 1978
<br />
<br />,~ O~;molion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr~ Elliott, the ordinance was adopted, and by
<br />the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Elliott, Holley, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 78-63 - The following ordinance approved on first reading at the Public Hearing meeting
<br />of February 13, 1978, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />(h) (2)
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1973,
<br />BY AMENDING SECTION 4~-45.1(b) THEREOF, PERTAINING TO REDUCTION OF OFF-SITE
<br />PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY."
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Dast, the ordinance was adopted, and by the
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Elliott, Holley, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 78-63 The following ordinance approved on first reading at the Public Hearing meeting
<br />of February 13, 1978, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />(i)
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1973, BY
<br />ADDING TO CHAPTER 40 THEREOF SECTION 40"56 PERTAINING TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING
<br />DISTRICTS."
<br />
<br /> Stuart M. Richardson, 4806 High Street, W., spoke agains~ the adoption of the ordinance.
<br /> Dr. Sidney Tiesenga 375 Middle Street, ~g~i~io~e T0~e PAc~ ~P~R~ in favor of
<br />the ordinance.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Oast and seconded by Mr. Elliott, the ordinance was adopted, and by
<br />the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Elliott, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: Holley
<br />
<br /> 78-63 The following ordinance approved on first reading at the Public Hearing meeting
<br />of Februery 13, 1978, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />(J)
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA, 1973, BY
<br />ADDING TO CHAPTER 40 THEREOF, SECTIONS 40-68.1 PERTAINING TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL
<br />DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS, TO BE KNOWN AS INDUSTRIAL M-1-R DISTRICTS."
<br />
<br /> Dr. Joseph Reeves, 4210 Burrland Drive, relinquished his time to Dr, W. H. Petrie,
<br />5201 ~eenbrook Drive, who spoke against the ordinance.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Elliott, the ordinance was adopted, and by
<br />the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Elliott, Holley, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />77-448 - Public Hearing on the following ~ez~ning application:
<br />
<br />(i) Z 77-39 - Petition of Associated Churchland Investors, Inc. and St. Marks United Methodist
<br /> ChUrch, by Joseph Preziotti, Jr., Planning Consultant for Baldwin & Gregg,
<br /> d~ferre~ at the Public Hearing meeting of December 12, 1977.
<br />
<br /> Joseph Preziotti, representing Baldwin & Gregg, requested to amend his petition for C-i,
<br />OR-7B, M-1 Industrial be substituted to M=I-R Zoning District, and be permitted to withdraw
<br />its previously recorded deed ~estrictions covenant that apply to the three zoning districts.
<br />
<br />Benj.~min J. Levy, 2908 Replica Lane, representing Peachtree Associates, eon~urred ~ith~
<br />
<br /> R. Stuart Baldwin, 620 May Avenue, Norfolk, representing Baldwin & Greeg, Ltd., asked
<br />that zoning be granted nnder M-i-R, if not, original application be granted under the original
<br />petition.
<br />
<br /> Dr. W. H. Petri, 5201 Greenbrook Drive, representing Citizmns Against Residential
<br />Envelopment, requested that the application to be denied.
<br />
<br /> W. T. P~rry, 4108 Burrland Road, spoke against the application being amended, and in his
<br />opinion it shoBld be considered a new application.
<br />
<br /> Mrs. Thomas R. Beeler, 4209 Burrland Road, representing Citizens Against Residential
<br />Envelopment, opposed the petition.
<br />
<br />Ms. Carol Malinavskas, 4614 Southampton Arch, spoke as an individual against the petition
<br />
<br />
<br />
|