|
June 24~ 1980
<br />
<br />Doug Parker, Cypress Cove Villas, representing Cypress Cove Civic League.
<br />Dr. Durbin Donahue, 4421 Carolton Court, representing Hatton Point Civic Group.
<br />George Farish, Cypress Cove Condo, representing Cypress Cove Condo Assn.
<br />Charles L. Marcus, 3709 Shoreline Drive.
<br />Ernest Hardee, Hardee Point, representing Hatton Point.
<br />Dr. W. H. Petri, 5620 Shoreline Drive, representing Hatton Point Civic League,
<br />petitions signed by Mrs. Allen B. Frye, 4316 Templar Drive and others."
<br />
<br />presented
<br />
<br />Alex T. Mayo, J~., 102 Park~Road, Attorney representing Portsmouth Partners, spoke and
<br />requested that the property located at the northeast corner of Hedgerow Lane and River
<br />Shore Road, slated for rezoning from its present R-75 to R-75-S, be deleted from the
<br />the Comprehensive Plan.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Early, that the Comprehensive Plan to be
<br />adopted.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr. Early, to amend that the northeast corner of
<br />Hedgerow Lane and River Shore Road to remain R-75, and the recommendations of the Planning
<br />Commission be forwarded to the new Council, and was adopted by unanimous vote.
<br />
<br />On motion, the following resolution was adopted, as amended, and by the following vote:
<br />
<br />"A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY
<br />OF PORTSMOUTH DESIGNATED CP-80-1.
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the Code of Virginia, 1950, requires that every governing body shall adopt
<br />a Comprehensive Plan by July 1, 1980; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission
<br />the existing conditions and trends of
<br />the City and its inhabitants; and
<br />
<br />made a careful and comprehensi~s survey and study of
<br />growth, and of the probable futurs requirements of
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, prior to the recommend~t~om, g~vm~oti~ee,and ~eld
<br />public hearings on the plan as required by law, and prepared and recommended a Comprehensive
<br />Plan for the physical, social and economic development of the City; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Portsmouth has held public hearings, with notice
<br />as required by law, and considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan.
<br />
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia:
<br />
<br /> That the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, designated CP~80-1
<br />be, and hereby is approved and adopted."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Beamer, Early, Gray, Holley, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 80-204 The following ordinance approved on first reading at the Public Hearing of
<br />June 9, 1980, was taken up and read:
<br />
<br />(a) "ZONING JdMBNDMENT ORDINANCE Z 80-5"
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mr. Oast, the ordinance was adopted, and by the
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Beamer, Early, Gray, Holley, Oast, Davis
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br /> 80-204 On motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mr. Early, the following
<br />approved on first reading at the Public Hearing of June 9, 1980, was adopted
<br />following vote:
<br />
<br />resolution
<br />and by the
<br />
<br />(c) "A RESOLUTION GRANTING A USE PERMIT TO ZION BAPTIST CHURCH TO OPERATE A
<br /> C~URCH AND PLACE OF WORSHIP AT S27 GREEN STREET.
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, Zion Baptist Church, by B. B. Adderholdt, Jr., Architect, made an application
<br />pursuant to Section 40-72(b) of the Code of the City of Portsmouth, 1973, as amended, for
<br />the granting of a use permit as hereinafter-described; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the applicant and Planning Director have done all things required to be done
<br />in connection with said application; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended the granting of said use permit.
<br />
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the CounciI of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia:
<br />
<br />1. That the use for which the use permit hereinafter-described is sought:
<br />
<br /> (a) Will not adversely affect the health and safety of persons residing and
<br />working in the neighborhood of the proposed use;
<br />
<br /> (b) Will not be detrimental to the public use or injurious to the property or
<br />improvements in the neighborhood; and
<br />
<br />[c) Will be in accord with the purposes of the Zoning Chapter of the City Code.
<br />
<br />
<br />
|