My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 07/22/1980
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1980s
>
Year 1980
>
Minutes 07/22/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2001 2:54:16 PM
Creation date
9/10/2001 2:53:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
7/22/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 22, 1980 <br /> <br /> The remaining $25,000 includes continuation of the $10,000 contract to the Human Resource~ <br />Office. $8,500 for salarias and fringes for the Clerk Typist and $6,500 for transportation. <br /> <br /> I feel that the above recommendations will provide the necessary supplemental Huma~r~Servi, <br />support to the residents of the Community Development areas." <br /> <br /> Michael Kay, Executive Director of the Portsmouth R~dev~lopment & H~using Authority <br />presented the following statement: <br /> <br /> "As the City Manager mentioned, the proposed 1981 Community Development Program generally <br />provides for the continuation of the locality's comprehensive effort to target increasingly <br />scarc~ CD resources so as to have the most significant long Germ impact on our city. We shoulc <br />also indicate that the effectuation of the 1981 Plan requires that the City amend the 1980 <br />Program and the three-year strategy approved in 1979. As most of you here are aware, the <br />emphasis in our previous action years has been devoted to the improvement of the Southside <br />community. It is proposed in the 1981 prog~am~to provide funding for the assemblage of pro- <br />perty in the two blocks delineated on the exhibit before you. <br /> <br /> In addition to the continuation of funding for the Local Rehabilitation Loan Program, <br />primarily for the Historic Districts of Cradock and Truxtun, financi~ settlement and program <br />· ncome derived from the Mount Hermon, Effingham, Park View, Olde Towne and Crawford projects <br />are to be used to fund ongoing activities in these projects in accordance with prior written <br />agreements between HUD, the City and ~he Authority. Waterfront Planning, Human Services, <br />Codes Enforcement and Public ~mprovements will also be undertake~ under the 1981 Community <br />Development Program. <br /> <br />Two new areas are being proposed for funding under the 1981 Community Development Program <br /> <br /> Crawford Urban Renewal/Downtown South this area represents the last ma~or untreated <br />and blighted residential neighborhood in the downtown area. It is hoped that a sizeable <br />portion of this 19th century~neighborhood can be retained through a combination of redevelop- <br />ment and conservation efforts. This area was first recommended for public attention in the <br />RU/DAT Study conducted in 1977. The City's Downtown Revitalization Study adopted by City <br />Council in 1978 also recommended this area for conservation efforts. One such effort made by <br />the City was the enactment of a new flexible residential/commercial zoning district for this <br />neighborhood which was implemented in the summer of 1979. This single acticn represented a <br />significant step toward preserving this area. Other private investments such as the restora- <br />tion of the New Kirn Building and the Pythian Castle, along with the provision of 100 new <br />units of elderly housing in this neighborhood by PRHA, give added significance to this area's <br />importance to downtown revitalization. It is recommended that $900,000 in 1981 CD funds be <br />used to begin this program. <br /> <br /> Hattonsville this former agricultural community has long been designated for industrial <br />reuse in the general plan. Natural development activities occurred in the area for several <br />years in the early i970's until private land assemblage was no longer possible and public <br />improvements supporting industrial facilities were not available. This situation resulted <br />in the Hattonsville non-residential corridor remaining almost stagnant and increasingly <br />blighted, part industrial and part residential, with the area's residents left in an uncertain <br />situation. Therefore, it is recommended that $845,000 be allocated to begin a program of <br />land assemblage to maximize the development potential of this section, thus bringing this <br />component of the new and former comprehensive plan to fruition. Recent interest in existing <br />facilities such as evidenced by ~.T.T. Gwaltney, along with the advent of the new 1-264 <br />tunnel and Bowers Hi11/664 Beltway, make this area an ideal port and highway related indus- <br />trial area. <br /> <br /> From the housing side, substantial rehabilitation is proposed to be the primary vehicle <br />for meeting the City of Portsmouth's housing needs for 1981. The exhibit at the front <br />delineates those census tracts wh~re ~ubstantial rehabilitation under the Section 8 Program <br />will be permitted." <br /> <br />The following citizens spoke: <br /> <br /> O'Neal B. Taylor, 1304 Roosevelt Boulevard, representing Norfolk-Portsmouth Citizens <br />Committee for Economic Development presented the following letter: <br /> <br /> "As most ~f you may be aware, the Norfolk and Portsmouth City Councils formed the <br />No~folk-Portsmouth Citizens Committee for Economic Development (NOCCED) in 1975 as a two-city <br />advisory body. The purposes of this organization are to formulate plans and programs designed <br />to increase employment.opportunities and broaden the economic base of each municipality. <br />NPCCED has developed and maintained a work program pursuant to this mandate, with iIs most <br />recent accomplishment being the completion of the Southside II Industrial mini-Park and the <br />location of Virginia Products Corporation there~n. <br /> <br /> During the past five years, ~he Committee has worked closely with the Portsmouth Indus- <br />trial Development Authority (PIDA), the Portsmouth Port and Industrial Commission (P~IC), the <br />Portsmouth Redevelopment and Housing Authority (PRHA), and the City administration td insure <br />that its programs were well coordinated with those of the four aforementioned entities. As <br />an example, an application ~6r.~FeHe~al~fu~ng of a drainage project at the former Georgia <br />Pacific property on Chautauqua Avenue has been prepared by City staff and submitted to the <br />Economic Development Administration at the direction of the Committee. It is intended that <br />jointly with the Portsmouth Port and Industrial Commission, the property's owner, new economic <br />activity can be attracted once the drainage project is completed. This is in keeping with <br />our intent to complem~nt~the activities of other eonomic groups whenever possible. <br /> <br /> Each year the Norfolk-Portsmouth Citizens Committee for Economic Development updates <br />its strategy so that it is consistent with the previously stated goals. Recently, we have <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.