Laserfiche WebLink
.2,.35 <br /> <br />October 14, 1980 <br /> <br />At a regular meeting of the City Council held on October 14, 1980, there were present: <br /> <br />J. E. Johansen, Ben A. Beamer, Sr., J. Robert Gray, Edward L. Oast, Jr., <br />Gloria O. Webb, Robert T. Williams, City Manager, Steven Lieverman, City Attorney. <br /> <br /> Absent: Jack P. Barnes, Morton V. Whitlow <br /> <br /> Rev. Vernon A. Battle, Pastor, Trinity Baptist Church, <br /> Mayor Johansen welcomed all visitors in attendance. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Gray and seconded by Mrs. Webb, minutes <br />23, 1980; minutes of the regular meeting of September 23, <br />and was adopted by unanimous vote. <br /> <br /> .! , UNFINISHED BUSINESS - <br /> <br />opened the meeting with prayer. <br /> <br />of the called meeting of September <br />1980, to be approved as received, <br /> <br /> 80-342 - The following report was submitted by the City Manager on Noble Street: <br /> <br /> "As you are aware, Mr. James Oliver appeared before City CoUncil on September 9, 1980 <br />requesting the extension of curbs and gutters along Noble Street where the Noble Street Baptis <br />Church is presently providing curbs and gutters in compliance with the City's development <br />ordinances. This area is listed as priority 25 on the City's curb and gutter priority list. <br />Presently, we are working on the design of priorities 8 through 10. <br /> <br /> While the suggestion offered by Mr. Oliver is constructive, it poses problems both in <br />~olicy and budget. Obviously, to approge such a suggestion would be contrary to the City's <br />adopted priority system. Secondly, there are no funds available to implement this suggestion, <br />which is estimated to cost approximately $62,000. AS you are aware, several priorities in the <br />top 10 are ready to proceed from a design standpoint and are awaiting their turn for funds. <br /> <br /> A second point addressed by Mr. Oliver concerns the transition for automobiles from the <br />wider curb-lined streets to the narrower ditch-lined streets. This is a v~lid concern. The <br />City has many examples of this kind of transition. As a regular procedure, the City's Traffic <br />Engineering Department marks such areas with reflective delineators which have Proven tO be ye <br />satisfactory. This precaution will also be taken at the subject location. <br /> <br /> Our investigation did reveal a small section (sixty feet) of Noble Street between Ports- <br />mouth Boulevard and the existing curb to be missing curb. The provision of this missing curb <br />would improve both drainage and traffic movement in this intersection. The cost, projected <br />at less than $3,000, is recommended for funding from our limited "Hot Spots" program, which <br />is designed %q address such minor improyements." <br /> <br /> James Oliver, 30 Noble Street, spoke regarding the above report and Mr. Williams <br />responsed to questions asked by Mr. Oliver. <br /> <br /> Joseph Hinson, 46 Noble Street, inquired about installing curbs and gutters by the <br />citizens. <br /> <br /> James L. Wilder, 43 Noble Street, requested that the issue be given consideration and <br />not be pushed"aside. <br /> <br /> Motion of Mr. Oast and seconded by Mr. Gray, the report to be received as information, <br />and was adopted by unanimous Vote. <br /> <br /> 80-350 The following ordinance approved on first reading at the regular meeting of <br />September 23, 1980, was taken up and read: <br /> <br />"AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $90,000 FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR <br />REPAIRS AND WATERPROOFING FOR THE CRAWFORD STREET PARKING GARAGE." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mr. Beamer and seconded by Mr. Gray, the ordinance was adopted, and by the <br />following vote: <br /> <br /> Ayes: Beamer, Gray, Oast, Webb, Johansen <br /> Nays: None <br /> / <br /> 80-35'7 '- "Consideration of an amendment of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to <br />purchase surplUs water from the City of Suffolk during a draught-caused emergency; to sell <br />water' to Suffolk under s~milar conditions." <br /> <br /> On motion of Mrs. Webb and seconded by Mr. Beamer, the following resolution was adopted, <br />and by the following vote: <br /> <br />"A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE CITY MANAGER'S AUTHORIZATION TO SELL SURPLUS <br />WATER TO SUFFOLK UNDER CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, adopted a Resolution at a <br />meeting held September 23, 1980, authorizing the City Manager to purchase surplus water from <br />the City of Suffolk during draught-caused emergency and to sell water to Suffolk under simila~ <br />conditions; and <br /> <br /> <br />