|
366
<br />
<br />August 23, 1983
<br />
<br /> (d) All exterior play area facilities will be used only between the hours of 8:00 A.
<br />M. and 6:00 P.
<br />
<br />tions
<br />
<br />of this
<br />
<br />Refuse collection shall be approved by Public Works prior to occupancy;
<br />
<br />Ail health, fire and building codes must be met pr{or to commencement of opera-
<br />facility;
<br />
<br /> (g) The applicant shall comply with all codes, ordinances, policies and regulations
<br />of federal, state and local governments that may be applicable, and shall have obtained all
<br />necessary licenses and permits required for this use;
<br />
<br /> (h) This use permit is issued to Child's World, Inc. for the operation of a facilit~
<br />known as Children's World, and is not transferrable to any other entity, corporation or loca~
<br />tion;
<br />
<br />(i) No children shall be discharged or picked up on Trucker Street."
<br />
<br />Ayes: Barnes, Beamer, Gray, Holley, Webb, Whitlow, Johansen
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />Other I~ems~Under Unfinished Business
<br />
<br />83-301 - Proposed Amendment to the Code:
<br />
<br />(g) CA 83-8 -
<br />
<br />An ordinance to amend Sections 40~31, 40-68(b), 40-68.1(e),
<br />40-70(b), 40-71(b), 40-73(b), 40-74(b), 40-75(b), 40-76(a)~(b),
<br />40-77Cb), 40-78(b), 40-78(b), 40-120(a)&(b), to provide for
<br />certain changes in child and adult care facilities, deferred
<br />from the Public Hearing of August 9, 1983.
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mrs. Webb, that CA 83-8 be deferred until Council
<br />has an opportunity to consider all changes being proposed, and was adopted by unanimous vote.
<br />
<br /> 83-304 - Resolution authorizing the City Manager ~to enter into a memorandum of under-
<br />standing between the City of Portsmouth and~the Fii~ir~g~Port Authority~ deferred from the
<br />regular meeting of August 9, 1983, was taken up and!~ead.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr. Barnes and seconded by Mr~.G~ay, to adopt the fe~tiOn~ ~
<br />
<br /> Motion of Mr. Whitlow and seconded by Mr. Gray, theamend the resolution authorizing the
<br />City Managerto execute any and all doctunentsnecessary and ad¥is~ble to carry out provisions
<br />of the agreement, and was adopted by unanimous vote.
<br />
<br />On motion, the following resolution, as amended, was adopted by the following vote:
<br />
<br />"A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF
<br />INTENT BETWEEN~THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH AND THE VIRGINIA PORT AUTHORITY.
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the City of Portsmouth and the Virginia Port Authority have agreed to the ex-
<br />change of certain properties necessary to the further development of the Port area and the Cit
<br />sewage treatment plant; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the City of Portsmouth has agreed to the designation of certain property for
<br />expansion of the Port Terminal Area for private and pubIic development upon certain conditions
<br />relating to the payment of taxes; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the Virginia Port Authority has agreed to make payment of certain amounts due, o
<br />to become due, pursuant to the Port Unification Contract between the City of Portsmouth and
<br />the Virginia Port Authority; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the Virginia Port Authority has agreed to resolve certain legal disputes as set
<br />forth in the Declaratory Judgment action brought by the Virginia Port Authority pertaining to
<br />certain street closures.
<br />
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Portsmouth, Virginia, that
<br />the City Manager be, and he hereby is, authorized to enter into a Memorandum of Intent between
<br />the city of Portsmouth and the Virginia Port Authority and to execute any and all documents
<br />necessary and advisable to carry out the provisions thereof."
<br />
<br /> Ayes: Barnes, Beamer, Gray, Holley, Webb, Whitlow, Johansen
<br /> Nays: None
<br />
<br /> Manager concerning UP 83-3, 4 & 8:
<br />
<br /> !~AS requested by the City Council, the above-referenced use permit applications were
<br /> deferred to allow the staff further review of their compat&bility with the Comprehensive Plan.
<br /> These three applications are for churches located in the areas currently targeted for redevelc
<br /> ment, both in the Comprehensive Plan and in the Priority Action Program. The City's plan for
<br /> downtown revitalization previously approved, as well as the current Priority Action Program,
<br /> involves the investment for redevelopment changes towards commercial usage of the properties
<br /> in question.
<br /> In light of this review and evaluation, the staff recommends, and I concur, that the use
<br /> permit for each of the three proposed churches be denied. The use of the properties in ques-
<br />
<br />
<br />
|