My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 04/30&05/02/1985
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1980s
>
Year 1985
>
Minutes 04/30&05/02/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2001 1:57:12 PM
Creation date
8/31/2001 1:55:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
4/30/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 30, 1985 <br /> <br /> In 1983 I recommended the creation of the Department of Economic Development and you <br />adopted that recommendation. For the first time Economic Development efforts were concentrate~ <br />in one particular department and funds needed to operate this department and market Portsmouth <br />were provided. I believe the creation of that department and the hiring of the appropriate <br />qualified personnel has proven to be a worthy investment. In 1984 new taxable investment in <br />Portsmouth was more than $66 million and 780 new jobs were created. Building permit activity <br />increased 33% over the previous year. New marketing methods have created a positive image for <br />outside investors of Portsmouth and I believe a positive outlook permeates our community. <br />Because of these efforts and the new construction initiated this year plus projects planned <br />for the future, I feel Portsmouth's economic outlook is stronger than ever. <br /> <br /> Even though this may be the brightest budget presented to a Portsmouth City Council in <br />more than a quarter of a century, I would like to pass on this word of caution. Our commercial <br />tax base is increasing at a decreasing rate. For instance, in the last five years Portsmouth <br />retail sales have increased by appro×imately 21%, primarily the result of inflation. Compared <br />to other municpalities, such as Chesapeake at approximately 64%, Virginia Beach at 74~, and <br />Norfolk at 31%, Portsmouth has not shared in the growth of this regional activity. The primary <br />method of sharing the regional wealth is through the sales tax or meal and lodging tax. Con- <br />sequently, our citizens desparately need to attract commerce to our City. Any effort that Cit <br />Council, ~employees, or the citizens can do to attract new commercial activity would help to <br />eliminate this deficiency. Obv~ns~y, our new efforts to promote tourist attractions and <br />solicit conferences in PortsmoUth is also directed toward this end. <br /> <br /> For the first time since 1974, the City's proposed budget is not dependent upon Revenue <br />Sharing. In discussions and correspondence with our members of Congress, contrary to all <br />previous years, they feel that revenue sharing will definitely be phased out. It is essential <br />therefore, that our dependency on this form of assistance, over $2 million, likewise be remove <br />Although I certainly favor revenue sharing and hope for its continuance, pragmatically we must <br />plan for its demise. In review of budget messages by four previous City Managers, each has <br />indicated that our dependency on this form of revenue, although necessary, was not desirable <br />from an operating perspective. <br /> <br /> In last year's budget message, I proposed the implementation of a work management system <br />in the Departments of Public Works, Public Utilities, and General Services. Previously we had <br />initiated a similar Frogram in the Department of Parks ~ Recreation. Consultants were hired <br />in December, 1984, and have completed the organizational review of these departments. The <br />major finding of the review ms that a net reduction of twenty-six positions can be realized <br />while still providing the same level of service to the citizens of Portsmouth. This amounts tc <br />a personnel savings of over $350,000. Over the next year as the automated system is £ully im- <br />plemented, I expect additional savings to be realized due to further reductions in positions <br />and increased productivity in field operations. I also plan to expand the work management <br />program to other departments in the City. With the implementation of the work management stud) <br />and the reduction of twenty-six positions, we were able to offset much of the cost of the pro- <br />posed service increases. <br /> <br /> As you are aware, there are only two cities in Virginia that still have the position of <br />High Constable -- Norfolk and Portsmouth. Historically and up until the last two years, this <br />office has generated sufficient revenue to meet expenses. At that time, the General Assembly <br />authorized the Sheriff to serve the same papers at no charge. Some companies and businesses <br />have preferred the High Constable to provide the servmce. However, because of the free servic~ <br />offered through [he Sheriff's Department there is a substantial deficit now occurring in the <br />High Constable's Office. The High Constable has recommended ~o me, in an effort to save the <br />citizens from further subsidies of his operation, to eliminate his office. I commend Mr. <br />Williford for his frugalness and agree with his recommendation~ Therefore, there are no funds <br />for the operation of the High Constable included in this document. <br /> <br />MAJOR APPROPRIATIONS <br /> <br />Creation of a Department of Housing Services and <br /> <br />Community Development <br /> <br /> Our current program of systematic and concentrated code enforcemen~ is divided between <br />the Departments of Health and Inspections. Although the performance of these two agencies <br />has been adequate, in an effort to reach the Goals and ~j~etLag~se established by the City Counc <br />a more refined and proactive method must be established -- proactive not only in the method of <br />code enforcement, on the part of inspectors, but proactive in the neighborhoods with citizen <br />involvement. To staff this department, I recommend transferring existing positions in the <br />Building Official's Office and the Public Health Department ~ the new Department of Housing <br />Services and Community Development. This department would consist of nineteen employees <br />organinzed for the single purpose of protecting our residential and commercial environments <br />within our community. Whil~ there are no new positions, increased costs will result because <br />the State currently pays 55% of the salary and fringe benefits of Minimum Housing Inspectors. <br />I believe the $45,000 in additional costs to the City will ~e offset in part by improved col- <br />lection of rental inspection fees and will result in more responsive and efficient services to <br />the citizenry. The primary purpose of the Health Department is for protection of the physical <br />health and well being of our cmtizenry. The transfer or-the Minimum Housing Inspectors will <br />in no way deter the Health Department from meeting its primary mission. In fact, the Health <br />Director supports this organizational change. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.