Laserfiche WebLink
February 28, 2023 <br /> <br /> <br /> For example, the current text of Section 35-135 suggests that an applicant should <br />provide a “certificate of voluntary completion” in order to demonstrate that the property <br />has initially qualified for participation in the VRP; but in practice a “certificate of voluntary <br />completion” is only issued when a property leaves the VRP, not when it enters the <br /> <br />program. <br /> <br /> In addition, Section 35-135 also references an annual “certificate of continued <br />eligibility” issued by the Virginia Waste Management Board; but according to DEQ, the <br /> <br />Waste Management Board does not regularly issue such certificates. <br /> <br /> The issues created by the current language of Section 35-135 are technical rather <br />than substantive. DEQ does issue a letter documenting that a property has initially <br />qualified for participation in the VRP, but the documentation is not called a “certificate of <br />voluntary completion”. Likewise, it is possible for a property owner to obtain annual <br />evidence of continued participation in the VRP, but that evidence is generally not through <br /> <br />a “certificate of continued eligibility”. <br /> <br /> The proposed ordinance would amend Section 35-135 to eliminate these technical <br /> <br />issues without changing the substantive intent of the provision. <br /> <br /> In addition, the proposed ordinance makes some minor ‘clean up’ changes such <br />as adding the word “the” in subsection (a) and removing outdated references to the year <br /> <br />2006 in subsection (c). <br /> <br />Financial impact: <br /> <br /> <br /> None <br /> <br />Recommended Action: <br /> <br /> <br /> Adoption of the ordinance <br /> <br />Next Steps Following Council Action: <br /> <br /> The amendment will be forwarded to municode for incorporation into the City <br /> <br />Code. <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. Moody, and seconded by Mr. Tillage, to adopt the following <br />ordinance, and was adopted by the following vote: <br /> <br />“ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ORDAINING SECTION 35-135 OF CHAPTER 35 <br />OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, VIRGINIA (TAXATION; <br />ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION SITES) FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFORMING <br />THE PARTIAL REAL ESTATE TAX EXEMPTION AVAILABLE FOR ELIGIBLE <br />ENVIRONMENTAL SITES TO THE VIRGINIA CODE AND THE STANDARD <br />PRACTICES OF THE RELEVANT STATE AGENCIES.” <br /> <br /> <br />Ayes: Barnes, Hugel, Lucas-Burke, Moody, Tillage, Whitaker, Glover <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />23 - 65 - Adoption of an ordinance accepting funding from the Virginia Department <br />of Social Services in the amount of $2,700 and appropriating said amount in the FY <br />2023 Social Services Fund for the Family Partnership Meeting Incentive Program. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br /> Family engagement is a relationship focused approach that provides structure for <br />decision making and empowers both the family and community in the decision making <br />process. Meetings are held for all decisions involving prevention of placement in very high <br />and high risk CPS families, prior to a child’s removal from a birth or adoptive family, prior <br />to a change of placement, and prior to a change of goal. <br /> <br /> Family Partnership Meetings (FPM) can be convened at any time in the process <br />of service provision. They may be requested by the birth, foster or adoptive family, legal <br />guardian, <br />or by agency staff. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br /> FPM Incentive Funds are to assist with costs for local staff expenses associated <br />with conducting FPMs such as payments to trained facilitators, search activities to locate <br />and include family members, and payments to coaches for internal facilitators. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />