My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 01/23/2018
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000s
>
Year 2018
>
Minutes 01/23/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 12:19:02 PM
Creation date
2/14/2018 10:53:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 23, 2018 <br /> <br />Ayes: Clark, Lucas-Burke, Moody, Psimas, Smith, Whitaker, Rowe <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />18 - 43 - Adoption of an ordinance authorizing the transfer of $175,000 from the <br />Non-Departmental, Salary – Allowance for Salary Savings line item in the FY 2018 <br />General Fund Budget to the Non-Departmental, Benefits – Retiree Supplement line <br />item in the FY 2018 General Fund Budget for the purpose of funding a one-time <br />supplement in the gross amount of $500 to beneficiaries under the Portsmouth <br />Supplemental Retirement System and the Fire and Police Retirement System who <br />did not receive the one-time supplement authorized by Ordinance 2017-103 <br />adopted by City Council on November 28, 2017. <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br /> Per City Code, City Council is required to approve all budget transfers over <br />$100,000. <br /> <br /> On November 28, 2017, City Council adopted Ordinance 2017-103, which <br />authorized payment of a $500 supplement to certain retirees in the city’s closed retirement <br />plans, the Portsmouth Supplemental Retirement System (PSRS) and the Fire and Police <br />Retirement System (FPRS) (the “Prior Ordinance”). Under the Prior Ordinance, the <br />criteria for the supplement was that it would apply only to (1) retirees with 20 years of <br />service in the city and (2) all retirees that retired on disability. <br /> <br /> At the Council Work Session on January 9, 2018, it was the consensus of Council <br />that the $500 supplement should be paid not just to retirees meeting the criteria <br />established in the Prior Ordinance, but to all beneficiaries of PSRS and FPRS. <br /> <br /> The total number of beneficiaries under PSRS and FPRS who were not eligible for <br />the supplement under the Prior Ordinance is approximately 350 which equates to <br />$175,000. <br /> <br /> Anticipated non-departmental salary vacancy savings will be utilized to fund the <br />additional beneficiary supplement. Although still early in the fiscal year, there appears to <br />be some savings available attributable to staffing and attrition variances. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br /> The annual budget is a plan that may require adjustments as circumstances <br />change. Sound financial policy is to cover increase in operational expenses with savings <br />from other expenditure accounts or with increases from additional current year revenue. <br /> <br /> The proposed ordinance transfers savings from the FY 2018 Non-Departmental, <br />Salary – Allowance for Salary Savings line to the Non-Departmental Benefits - Retiree <br />Supplement line. <br /> <br /> It is anticipated that the supplemental payment to beneficiaries of PSRS and FPRS <br />who did not receive the supplement under the Prior Ordinance will be made in March <br />2018. <br /> <br />Financial Impact: <br /> <br /> This budget transfer will allow the city to provide a supplement to PSRS and FPRS <br />beneficiaries who were not eligible for the supplement authorized by the Prior Ordinance. <br />There is no impact to fund balance as current year expenditures savings will cover the <br />transfers. <br /> <br />Recommended Action: <br /> <br /> Adoption of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Next Steps Following Council Action: <br /> <br /> The Finance Department will complete the necessary budget adjustments. <br /> <br />1. Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky, P. O. Box 50141, spoke in support of this item but asked <br /> that limitations be set on supplements given to retirees. <br /> <br />2. Garland Alexander, 2913 Tanbark Lane, spoke in support of this item. <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. Moody, and seconded by Ms. Psimas, to adopt the following <br />ordinance, and was adopted by the following vote: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.