Laserfiche WebLink
February 23, 2016 <br /> <br /> <br />-Discussing the award of a public contract involving the expenditure of public <br />funds and the investment of public funds where competition or bargaining is <br />involved, where discussion in an open session would adversely affect the <br />bargaining position or negotiating strategy of the City and the financial interest <br />of the City, specifically regarding existing and potential future contractual <br />relationships with the Southeastern Public Service Authority for waste <br />disposal services; and <br /> <br /> <br />-pursuant to Virginia Code subsections 2.2-3711 A.7 and A.15 for the <br />purposes of consulting with legal counsel employed by the City as to a legal <br />matter requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel, and discussing <br />or considering medical records excluded from the Virginia Freedom of <br />Information Act pursuant to subdivision 1 of Virginia Code section 2.2-3705.5, <br />specifically regarding advanced sick leave; and <br /> <br /> <br />-pursuant to Virginia Code subsection 2.2-3711 A.6 for the purpose of <br />discussing the investment of public funds where competition or bargaining is <br />involved, specifically regarding contracting for MWBE policy development <br />services; and <br /> <br /> <br />-pursuant to Virginia Code subsection 2.2-3711 A.1 for the purpose of <br />discussing prospective candidates for and appointees to boards and <br />commissions; and <br /> <br /> <br />-pursuant to Virginia Code subsection 2.2-3711 A.7 for the purpose of <br />consultation with legal counsel pertaining to actual or probable litigation, <br />where such consultation in open meeting would adversely affect the <br />negotiating or litigating posture of the City, specifically regarding City of <br />Portsmouth, Virginia v. South Norfolk Jordan Bridge, LLC, Portsmouth Circuit <br />Court case numbers CL 15002064-00 and 01; and <br /> <br /> <br />-pursuant to Virginia Code subsection 2.2-3711 A.1 for the purpose of <br />discussing the performance of a member of City Council. <br /> <br />The motion was adopted by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Cherry, Edmonds, Meeks, Moody, Psimas, Wright <br />Nays: Whitaker <br /> <br /> Motion by Mr. Cherry, and seconded by Dr. Edmonds, pursuant to Section 2.2- <br />3712(D) of the Code of Virginia, certifying that to the best of the Council Members’ <br />knowledge during the immediately preceding Closed Meeting of the City Council: <br /> <br />1. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting <br />requirements by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, and <br /> <br />2. Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion, by which <br />the Closed Meeting was convened, were heard, discussed or considered in <br />the meeting by the City Council. <br /> <br /> The motion was adopted by the following vote: <br /> <br />Ayes: Cherry, Edmonds, Meeks, Moody, Psimas, Wright <br />Nays: Whitaker <br /> <br /> On motion, meeting adjourned. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />