Laserfiche WebLink
March 26, 2013 <br />• There are essentially two problems affecting the fiscal viability of the plans: <br />insufficient cash flow and assets that have deteriorated to the point where one bad year <br />of investment losses could jeopardize the solvency of the plans. It will take $150 million <br />just to get the plans to 80 cents of assets per dollar of liability, but that would be a <br />significant improvement and would bring the funded status of the plans to an acceptable <br />level. The quickest way to get us to that 80 cent level is through the issuance of <br />Pension Obligation Bonds (POBs). <br />• If properly structured and undertaken for the right reasons, the issuance of POBs <br />should not have a negative impact on the City's credit ratings. <br />• At the February 26 Council Work Session, City staff, along with representatives <br />from Davenport, the City's Financial Advisor, provided Council with a comprehensive <br />briefing on the issuance of Pension Obligation Bonds. <br />• At that same Work Session, City staff also briefed Council on the cost of <br />eliminating the Social Security Offset for the Portsmouth Supplemental Retirement Plan, <br />and how Pension Obligation Bonds could be structured to include this cost. The <br />Pension Plan's Actuary, New York Life, estimates the liability for eliminating that offset, <br />in today's dollars, is approximately $21 million. The increased ARC needed to pay for <br />that cost will be approximately $2 million per year. <br />• The City plans to fund the Social Security Offset liability by including that cost in <br />Pension Obligation Bonds with an interest only period. Budgetary savings would be <br />dedicated to funding the liability over a roughly four year time period. In doing so, the <br />City would save interest costs by paying down the liability in a relatively short time <br />period. <br />• City staff and Davenport are moving forward on an accelerated schedule to issue <br />the Pension Obligation Bonds as quickly as possible in order to take advantage of the <br />current low interest rate environment. <br />• The first formal step in the process is to hold a Public Hearing, which is <br />scheduled for Council's April 23, 2013 meeting. <br />Discussion: <br />• The accelerated schedule for issuing Pension Obligation Bonds includes a Public <br />Hearing on April 23, when Council will also approve the terms of the bond issuance. <br />• The Mayor, City staff, and Davenport will visit the bond rating agencies in early <br />May <br />• The bonds are expected to be sold on June 4, with a closing date of June 27. <br />Financial Impact: <br />• The bonds are projected to be issued at a 4.5% interest rate, and will be taxable. <br />• The debt service on the portion of the bonds needed to immediately boost the <br />funded level of the plans to 80% will be paid by the Annual Required Contribution (ARC) <br />for FY 2013-14 of $19 million. <br />• The debt service on the portion of the bonds that will cover the cost of eliminating <br />the Social Security Offset is expected to be $2 million per year, beginning in FY 2014- <br />15. If interest rates end up lower than 4.5%, the cost will be less. The FY 2014-15 <br />Budget will include this additional cost. <br />• Based on a borrowing rate of 4.5%, the PSRS Plan would need to earn at least <br />6.2% and the Fire and Police Plan would need to earn at least 5.6% over the 24 year <br />bond amortization period in order for the estimated payments to be sufficient to cover <br />the cost of Plan benefits. <br />• There is a risk that if the Plans earn less than these "hurdle rates" over time, the <br />ARC will need to increase. However, that same risk exists if the City does not issue the <br />bonds. <br />Recommended Action: <br />• Adoption of a motion to set the April 23, 2013 Public Hearing Date. Vision <br />Principle: Efficient, Responsive Government. <br />1. Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky, P. O. Box 50141, spoke in support of the public hearing <br />but voiced his concerns with the intent and management of the bonds. <br />