Laserfiche WebLink
184 <br /> <br />April 24,' 1990 <br /> <br />with estimated revenues being completely in balance with the <br />recommended appropriations. It would not be fiscally <br />responsible to use any of the remaining fund balance to support <br />expenditures i5 the 1990-91 operating budget. <br /> <br /> The City needs a substantial fusd balance for cash' flow <br />purposes, as well as for contingencies. It is important to note <br />that our need. to borrow through revenue anticipation notes in <br />1990-91 will be due to-the reduction in the fund balance which <br />has taken place o~er the past five years. -- . <br /> <br /> The ~hart b~low illustrates the City's typical a:nnuat cash <br /> <br />flow. <br /> <br />CASH FLOW <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />FUTURE BOND ISSUE <br /> <br /> Bonds totaling $31!~8~99'9~aye been authorized, but are <br />unissued at this time. This amount is expected to be increased <br />with the adoption of the next CIP later this fall. <br />Additionally, public utility bonds will need to be authorized in <br />the near future for constructioh of a new water transmission <br />line as well as other public utility imProvements~ We will plan <br />to recommend that a referendum be included in the November, <br />1990, election for these public utility bonds. We anticipate <br />recommending a bond issue totaling approximately $40 million to <br />be sold in late 1990. This proposed budget includes <br />appropriations for one scheduled interest payment on the <br />anticipated new bond issue, to be paid during the budgeted <br />fiscal year. It is also expected that some bond anticipation <br />notes, which are presently authorized, will be sold in the <br />meantim~ and retired with the proceeds of the next bond issue. <br /> <br /> OTBER ITEMS ~ <br /> <br /> Several other items which warrant brief mention are as <br />follows: <br /> <br /> o Although no increase in the real estate tax rat~'was <br />recommended this year, the Citywide reassessment of real estate <br />averaged 4.21% according to the City Assessor. <br /> <br /> o Two years ago a monthly $0.40 utility charge on telephone <br />bills was enacted to establish the Enhanced 911 (E-911) <br />emergency <br /> <br /> <br />