Laserfiche WebLink
direct <br />exp~ns <br />propos <br />from t <br />invest <br />app~oD <br /> <br />dis~bi <br />pen~ic <br />icompen <br />iretire <br /> <br />City u <br />~ct~ <br />ionly d <br />icom en <br /> <br />the~ <br /> <br />items <br />mos <br />taxeS <br />durln <br /> <br />sig~if <br />pos~ik <br />the~Sc <br /> <br />exceed <br />this <br />fiscal <br />the~la <br /> <br /> April 24, 1990 <br /> <br />from the retirement funds, S~nce ~thes~- fees ~ <br />which is directly related t0 the investnent <br />budget recommends that these expenses~ )e paid <br />retirement funds beginning July i1, 199]. The~ <br />nt management fees have been removed fr)m the <br />ati!ons in the recommenided 1990,91 operating bu¢ <br /> <br />. Whenever employees retire on service <br />ty under the Portsmouth~ Retirement Syst <br />~hich is usuall~ two-thirds of their average <br />tion. These retirees are also eligible for wo~ <br />tion benefits, To avoid duplication ofilbene~i~ <br />nt code provides for a reduction in thei retiren <br />e equal to the amount of compensation w~ich is <br />er the Provisions of the Virginia Workers'" Com~ <br />e reduction in the disability retiremen~ pensi¢ <br />ing the period for which the retiree is~receiv] <br />tion payments (usually 500 weeks). Payments <br />tion benefits are paid from the City's ~elf-in~ <br />he proposed budget recommends that the ~etireme <br />to provide for the retirement funds to bay to <br />~rance fund an amount equal to the pens[on redt <br /> retirement funds would be reimbursing <br /> part of the cost of workers' compensat <br />ual to the savings in pension payments <br />9tirement systems. The proposed budget <br /> will total $700,000 in the 1990- <br /> <br />extremely important to continue to m <br />of our retirement systems. Even though <br />will place added expenditures in the <br />continue to be fiscally sound. As of <br />valuation, June 30, 1989, the unfunde <br />was completelY eliminated and actuari <br />re approximately $8 million. Although <br />of the status of the retirement funds <br />ar point in time, our actuarial consult <br />commended changes are fiscally appropri <br /> <br /> FUND BALANCE <br /> <br /> 1989-90 budget was adopted last year o~ the b~ <br /> .ilization of the available fund balance of $( <br /> due to a sluggish regional and nationa~ econon <br /> revenue are lagging behind budget estlmates~ <br />!nificant <br /> ones include sales, cigarette ~nd res~ <br /> Also, Several State revenue sources hav~ been -~ <br /> id-year such as the lLaw Enforcement Gra~t (HB5~ <br /> <br /> School Board has ~reported that they ar <br /> ant shortfall in their projected revenu <br /> as great as $1,200,000~ Even though b <br /> ol Administration have implemented act <br /> utes during the seoond half of the curr <br /> heless expected that the combined reven <br /> he expenditure reductions for the year. <br /> avorable budget variance to be $1,500,0 <br /> ear. Based on the actual budget varian <br /> fiscal year, and our projeCtions for t <br /> fund balance available is $4,270,931. <br /> amount to be appropriated as an eme <br /> ncy. Consequently, the 1990-91 recomme <br /> one, <br /> <br />epresent a~ <br />nings, the <br />directly <br />efore, <br />eneral Fun( <br />get. <br /> <br />d <br /> receive <br /> <br /> s, the <br /> en~:. ~ <br /> pa~ d by th <br /> en~atio 1 <br /> n applies <br /> ng workers <br /> workers' <br />urance <br />nt code be <br />he <br />ctions. <br />the se]f-insuranc~ <br />[on, that part <br />~hich a~e incurred <br /> estimates that <br />31 fiscal year. <br /> <br />~intain adequate <br />the tw¢ above <br />cetirement funds, <br />our moat recent <br />~ actuarial accrue <br />~1 accr%ed net <br />that represents a <br />at only one <br />~nts corcur that <br />ate. <br /> <br /> sis of no <br /> ,035,409. <br /> y several <br /> Some of <br /> aurant foo( <br /> educed <br /> ) funding. <br /> <br /> ~ expecting a <br />~s from the State, <br />Dth the City and <br />ions to curtail <br />~nt fiscal year, il <br />~e shortfall will <br /> We~haye projecte( <br />]0 for ~he current <br />De at t~e close of <br />%e !curr~nt fiscal <br /> We ha% e~ budgeted <br />~gency [ 1 udget <br />~ded bu¢ [et is a <br /> <br /> <br />