Laserfiche WebLink
5!9 <br /> <br />February 12, 1991 <br /> <br /> Aft. <br />by the D <br />Sun Micr, <br />22, 19~1 <br />were iDt. <br />Technolo~ <br />stations <br /> <br /> The <br />approp~i~ <br /> <br />size OK <br />involved <br /> The <br /> <br />.~r considerable research by the Engineering staff, aided <br />.~partment of Computer Services, computers manufactured by <br />) Systems, Inc. were selected and bids received January <br />as tabulated on Attachment 1. The two lowest bidders <br />.rvlewed oy a selection committee and the firm )f IPC <br />jies, Inc. was selected to provide two complete work <br />(including training) at a total price of $69,0]0. <br /> <br /> cost of the system will be taken from prior <br />~tions (with the exception of the EPA Storm Wat r Permit) <br />1 Attachment 1. The amounts were prorated baseJ on the <br />;he project as determined by the number of p~an sheets <br /> <br /> / <br />system id award of the bid to IPC Technologies, Inc. <br /> <br /> II :herefore, concur with this recommendation." <br /> <br />M( .on of Mr. Clemens and seconded by Mrs. Lucas ao E <br />a Comp~ ~r Aided Design and Drafting System, and awaz ;he <br />contra~ ~o IPC Technologies, Inc., was adopted by ur [mous vote. <br /> <br />9[-;0 - Letter from the City Manager transmittir ~he <br />Quarte~l, Financia~ Report for the period ended Dece~ ~ 31, 1990~ <br />and further transmitting the auditor's management le~mer <br />pertai~ihg, to the Comprenensive Annual Financial RepOrt for the <br />fiscal y~ar ended June-30, 1990. ' <br /> <br />~or th, :isca~ ~aree~ded June ~0 199~ ~as recent~ ~ r~ n' ~ <br /> , : y , , y/p ese ted to <br /> ,ou. ~ accompanying auditor s management letter i~ [so <br /> s, for your information. <br /> <br />A, [al revenues to date'stand at 41 percent of ~1 revenues <br />estima for the year, and 44 percent of the appropz ~ions have <br />been e: as of December 31, 1990. During the ss quarter <br />last y 42 percent:of the estimated revenues had b~ received <br />and ex were 45 percent of ~he budget appro~ ~tions. <br /> <br /> TI <br />are sl <br />expect, <br />accoun~ <br />and va~ <br />respec- <br /> <br /> M, <br />the re~( <br /> <br />~efore, at this point in time, revenues and . ~nditures <br />~tly less than last year's. Similar activit~ ~ould be <br />for the remainder of this fiscal year, takii into <br />:hat fourth quarter revenues are disproporti¢ ;ely large <br />~ble. There is no indication of su~bstantial )blems wit~ <br />'~o either the revenues or the expenditures." <br />t~on of Mr. Epperson and seconded by Mrs. Luce <br />'ts as information, and was adopted by <br /> <br />to receiv <br />vote. <br /> <br /> 9: <br />the fo: <br /> <br />effect: <br />reappo: <br />March <br /> <br />- NEW BUSINESS - <br /> <br />il - Councilman Kin~, offered the following <br /> Boards/Commissions: <br /> <br />of Electrical Examiners <br /> <br />nations t. <br /> <br />~ord L. Riddick appointed for a term of two ~s, <br /> March 1, 1991, replacing John H. Bender, J <br /> Joseph Dillard, for a term of two years~ ~ective <br /> 1991. <br /> <br /> <br />