Laserfiche WebLink
<br />September 23. 2008 <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. Heretick, and seconded by Ms. Psi mas, to adopt the following <br />resolution, and was adopted by the following vote: <br /> <br />"RESOLUTION CONCURRING WITH THE ELECTION BY THE HAMPTON ROADS <br />REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY OF VIRGINIA RETIREMENT SYSTEM ENHANCED <br />BENEFITS FOR HAZARDOUS DUTY POSITIONS FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES AT <br />THE HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Hampton Roads Regional Jail is the only jailor correctional <br />facility in Hampton Roads that does not provide the Virginia Retirement System's (VRS) <br />Enhanced Benefits for Hazardous Duty Positions or equivalent retirement benefits to <br />employees in eligible hazardous duty positions; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Board of the Hampton Roads Regional Jail Authority approved a <br />resolution on August 20, 2008, electing the VRS Enhanced Benefits for Hazardous Duty <br />Positions for eligible Jail employees; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, in order for the Board's election to become effective under the laws <br />and regulations governing the Virginia Retirement System, each of the participating <br />cities in the Regional Jail must confirm by resolution its agreement with the Board's <br />election. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Portsmouth, <br />Virginia, a political subdivision participating with the Hampton Roads Regional Jail, that <br />it hereby concurs that said Jail, participating in the Virginia Retirement System under <br />Title 51.1, Chapter 1, Article 5 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, may elect to have <br />such employees of the Jail who are employed in positions as full-time salaried Jail <br />Superintendents and Jail Officers and whose tenure is not restricted as to temporary or <br />provisional appointment, become eligible, effective October 1, 2008, to be provided <br />benefits in the Virginia Retirement System equivalent to those provided for State Police <br />officers of the Department of State Police, as set out in Section 51.1-138 of the Code of <br />Virginia, as such Code has been or may be amended from time to time, in lieu of the <br />benefits that would otherwise be provided." <br /> <br />Ayes: Heretick, Moody, Psi mas, Randall, Smith, Whitehurst, Holley <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />08 - 413 - Adoption of a resolution approving issuance of up to $13,500,000 in <br />Southeastern Public Service Authority (SPSA) Tax-Exempt Revenue Bonds to be used <br />by SPSA for capital improvements both within and outside the City of Portsmouth. <br />Vision Principle: A Robust and Prospering Economy. <br /> <br />Background: <br />. Periodically, SPSA issues bonds to pay for ongoing capital needs. It is in the <br />interest of SPSA and all its member jurisdictions, including Portsmouth that the bonds <br />are issued on a tax-exempt basis, in order to obtain the lowest possible interest rate. <br />. In order to qualify for tax-exempt status, the issuance of the bonds must be <br />approved by each locality in which some of the bond funds will be applied. Much of the <br />capital equipment to be financed by these bond proceeds is located at SPSA facilities in <br />Portsmouth. <br />. City Council approval of the SPSA bonds is needed in order for SPSA to be able <br />to obtain the best financing. <br /> <br />Discussion: <br />. The bonds are SPSA bonds, not City bonds. <br />. The bonds are to be paid out of SPSA revenues. The City has no liability or <br />financial exposure on them. <br />. The bonds will not have any adverse effect on the City's financial rating, and they <br />will assist SPSA. <br />