|
E April 28, 1992
<br />
<br /> NOW, TH REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of
<br />Portsmouth, ~irginia, and it is hereby declared, that an immediate
<br />need exists for the construction of the proposed water
<br />transmission main from the City of Suffolk in order to meet the
<br />
<br />needs of the
<br />
<br />Ayes:
<br />Nays:
<br />
<br />92-156
<br />motion
<br />contract wit~ Asbestos ContrOl Services to
<br />order limit on tne current contract.
<br />
<br /> citizens of the City of Portsmouth."
<br />
<br />Clemo]is, Corprew, Epperson, hawks, King, WilliamS, Webb
<br />None
<br />
<br /> Lett~er from the City Manager recommending adoption of a
<br /> I .
<br />to authorize the City Manager to execute an amended
<br /> exceed the 25% change
<br />
<br /> "At the January 14, 1992 City Council meeting, you approved
<br />award of a construction contract to Asbestos Control Services and
<br />appropriatio~ of $272,032~for asbestos removal at the old
<br />Churchtand H~gh School. This was included in the appropriation of
<br />$860,000 for the total demolition project.
<br />
<br /> This wo~k is progressing well and is ahead of schedule;
<br />however, after the initial soil removal it was found that the soil
<br />contaminatior under the School is much more extensive than was
<br />originally e~timated. The Director of Public Works, therefore,
<br />requests permission to exceed the allowable 25% limit ($68,008)
<br />for change o~ders should it become necessary for completion of the
<br />work. /
<br /> Sufficient funds were included in the original appropriation
<br />in anticipation of this situation. Therefore, no additional
<br />appropriatio~ will be required.
<br /> I, therefore, concur with the recommendation of the Director
<br />of Public Wo~ks to exceed the 25% allowable limit for change
<br />orders for t~is project and recommend your approval."
<br />
<br /> Motion Cf~Mr. Clemens and seconded by Mr. Epperson, to
<br />authorize the ~ity Manager to execute an amended contract with
<br />Asbestos Control Services, and was adopted on first and final
<br />reading and the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes: Clemo
<br />Nays: None
<br />
<br />92-157 - Lett
<br />motion to awa
<br />Seay, Mattern
<br />renovation of
<br />
<br /> "In acco
<br />the firm of H
<br />January 30, 1
<br />architectural
<br />period of fou
<br />
<br />, Corprew, Epperson, Hawks, King, Williams, Webb
<br />
<br />~r from the City Manager recommending adoption of a
<br />~d a contract in the amount of $28,542 to Hayes,
<br />and Mattern, for the design services for the
<br />the Elm Avenue Neighborhood Facility.
<br />
<br />fdance with the City's public procurement procedures,
<br />~yes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern was selected on
<br />~92 to provide electrical, mechanical and
<br /> design services on a project by project basis for a
<br /> years as required by the City.
<br />
<br /> Hayes, S ~y, Mattern and Mattern submitted a proposal to
<br />provide electzical, mechanical and architectural services for the
<br />Elm Avenue Ne!ghborhood Facility renovation project in the amount
<br />of $28,542. ?he Director of Public Works requests permission to
<br />award the design contract for this project to Hayes, Seay, Mattern
<br />and Mattern i9 the amount of $28,542. Funding for this project
<br />has been included in the appropriation approved on August 27, 1991
<br />for the Urban/Parks and Recreation Recovery (UPARR) program.
<br />
<br /> I, therefore, concur and recommend your approval to award the
<br />design contra~:t to Hayes, Seay, Mattern and Mattern."
<br />
<br />
<br />
|