Laserfiche WebLink
<br />March 21. 2006 <br /> <br />The condition of our stormwater collection and conveyance system mirrors that of our <br />water and sewer system. In addition, many of the stormwater system components are <br />inadequate to meet present day demands. Repair and upgrading of the existing system <br />and the funding of a "Lake and Pond Management Program" requires us to steadily and <br />gradually increase our stormwater fees. This budget recommends that we increase the <br />Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) by $0.50 per month. The impact on a residential <br />homeowner is an additional payment of $6.00 per year. <br /> <br />We are recommending an increase in the residential solid waste fee from $19 to $22 <br />per month, an increase of $3 per month. This increase is necessary to cover the cost of <br />operations so that the Waste Management Fund is not subsidized by the General Fund. <br /> <br />The total impact of these rate and fee changes on the average residential homeowner is <br />$5.80 a month. <br /> <br />Lowering Real Estate Tax Rate <br /> <br />Last year, at the request of the City Council, the City Assessor undertook a citywide <br />reassessment of all real estate with the assistance of a national assessment firm. The <br />resulting reassessment showed an average increase of 24.93 percent in commercial <br />and residential property assessments across the City. As such, Portsmouth's tax base <br />increased in value at a rate approximately equal to that of our neighboring cities. As <br />with all reassessments, there were significant variations from the average throughout <br />the City, with some properties showing declines in valuation rather than increases. We <br />took all of these factors into consideration in our budget calculations, in which one cent <br />($0.01) on the real estate tax rate equates to about $500,000 of revenue. In the face of <br />the significant increases in real property values, our goal was to implement City <br />Council's mandate to reduce the real estate tax rate as much as possible. Therefore, <br />we are recommending a six-cent ($0.06) reduction in the tax rate, from $1.44 to $1.38. <br />Please keep in mind that we are including two cents ($0.02) in the recommended $1.38 <br />tax rate to support the courthouse development project. Because of the variations in <br />values - from "declines" to "increases" - with the implementation of this budget <br />proposal, some taxpayers will pay less in taxes and some will pay more. Under the <br />proposed tax rate reduction, the theoretical average Portsmouth homeowner - whose <br />home increased 24.93 percent in value to $132,000 - will pay $24.98 a month more in <br />real estate taxes in FY07 than in the current fiscal year. <br /> <br />Fiscal Discipline <br /> <br />Portsmouth cannot afford to undertake everything that we would like to include in this <br />budget. Consequently, we have made some conscious choices in developing this <br />budget proposal. For example, although we have some departments requesting new <br />positions, we continue to keep our work force small while enhancing our overall <br />compensation package. Although we are making strides to catch-up with funding for <br />our employees, schools, and capital projects, we do so while continuing to focus on our <br />financial health. <br /> <br />This budget proposal continues specific financial policies and objectives that are <br />outlined in the city's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, dated October 18, 2005. <br /> <br />. Elimination of reliance on Revenue Anticipation Notes (RAN's) used as short- <br />term borrowing to meet current operating cash requirements <br /> <br />. Increase annual funding from the General Fund to eliminate cash flow deficits in <br />the Risk Management and Insurance fund <br />