Laserfiche WebLink
April 19, 1994 <br /> <br />down budgeted expenditures General Fund by $75,260 or 1% <br />for the coming year as compared to the prior year. Even with 7 <br />new public safety positions recommended, the budget still <br />reflects a reduction of 28 employee positions overall when <br />compared to the current fiscal '94 year -- quite an <br />accomplishment. Again, I applaud the determined efforts of the <br />City department heads. The success of our collective effort is <br />abundantly apparent. Because of this commitment, the proposed <br />budget does not recommend a real estate tax increase, and fee <br />and rate increases are modest, and mostly associated with <br />Federal and S~ate mandates. <br /> <br /> As I have just indicated, the budget does not contain a <br />recommendation for a real estate tax increase. However, it is <br />incumbent upon me as your Chief Executive Officer to discuss our <br />City's fiscal condition. First, let's exam/ne some trends that <br />I expect to be relevant over the coming fiscal year: <br /> <br />o Our fiscal position will improve only slightly over the <br /> next fiscal year -- possibly the next two fiscal years <br /> <br />o Without careful management, General Fund expenditures <br /> will exceed revenues <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Various fee increases will continue to be necessary over <br />the next two fiscal years due to unfunded Federal/State <br />mandates <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />The legitimate needs of public education (and <br />Federal/State mandates) will increase the costs of <br />government <br /> <br />o The Capital needs of the City will continue to require <br /> debt service increases <br /> <br />o Net revenues will remain flat <br /> <br /> Just recently our City was rated by the leading bond rating <br />agencies. I am pleased to report that we were able to maintain <br />our current ratings, especially when many cities across the <br />U.S.A. have been downgraded. I believe it important, however, <br />to share some of their assessment comment to set the context as <br />well as consider its implication: <br /> <br />o Components of City's economic base have been relatively <br /> stagnant <br /> <br />o Assessed values have shown only modest growth <br /> <br />o Financial position is adequate <br /> <br />o General Fund balance is only 4% of operating revenues <br /> <br />o Good budgetary control despite flat revenues in recent <br /> years <br /> <br />o Debt position is manageable, pay out is aggressive <br /> <br />o Debt ratios are higher than national median <br /> <br />o Fiscal stability has been maintained by downsizing <br /> <br /> We have been fortunate over the last four budgets. We have <br />not raised the real estate tax, our fee increases have been <br />modest, our employees have received pay.and benefit increases <br />while the work force has been reduced by more than 130 positions <br />at a taxpayer savings of several millions of dollars. We have <br />been and continue to be successful in our determination to <br />retool our .municipal organization. We are leaner and more <br />efficient. We have. difficult choices ahead, but I am confident <br />that the context is set and the depth of your understanding is <br />more complete. We are now ready for the challenge. <br /> <br /> <br />