My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 05/23/1911 (2)
Portsmouth-City-Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1910s
>
Year 1911
>
Minutes 05/23/1911 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2002 3:32:14 PM
Creation date
11/22/2002 2:51:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City Council - Type
Adopted Minutes
City Council - Date
5/23/1911
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
look ~Ish better and cause loss noise from the operation of the cars and of other traffic over the <br />street~. <br /> <br /> ~ae~lon O0~p~ny are to <br /> ~If the franchise r~quirements as to paving material to be used by the m ~ ~' <br />be changed, then it should be requiredte use wood block instead of brick, mr to.pave~all but a brick <br />or two bricks on each side of its rails with bithu~mthic~ <br /> <br /> "If the City is to make a concession which will save the Traction Oompany a considerable sum of <br />money, it should get something in return for this 6oncession. <br /> <br /> "The Traction Company claims it desires the concession in the interest of the public as well as <br />for its own interest~ <br /> <br /> ~!~uere is, in my opinion, something the p~b!ic would prefer the Traction ~omp~ny would give it <br />rather than T rail and vitrified brick paving between rails, and that is better cars. <br /> <br /> 'I have repeatedly asked the said company to put on its intra-ci~ty lines a few new cars, <br />my requests have been'declined~ <br /> <br /> ~For the reasons above given-~nd because i believe you have it within your power to secure for <br />the public and the patrons of the earlines better rolling stock, i disapprove cf the recommendation <br />of the street Committee, approved by the Council, granting to the Norfolk & Portsmouth TractiOn Co, <br />the right to use T rail and vitrified brick prying between rails an~ two feet each side of rails. <br /> <br />'~espe~tfully, <br /> *J~ Davis Reed, ~ayor.' <br /> <br /> The communicatdon from the Mayor having been read, the 0hair put the question.'Shall the action <br />of the Board'of Aldermen and the ~ommon gouneil ~y 4-pth stan~ as adopted~ ~he veto of the ~ayor <br />to the contrary notwithstanding?~ <br /> <br />Whereupon. said aotion w~s sustained, and by the following vote: <br /> <br />Benson, Brooks, Bilisoly, $ohnson, Leigh, Brinson, gross, Withy, <br />Nays--Hanvey, ~oore. 2. <br /> <br /> iyes-e~orbitt. Hail, <br />Ha~s, Hutchins, 1~. <br /> <br />~arrish, <br /> <br />Second~ An appropriation of ~350. te put new tubing in boiler of the Oh~mbers~ fire engine. <br />And b~ the following vote: <br /> Ayes~-0orbitt. Hall, Benson, Parrish, Brooks, Bilisoly, ~ohnson. <br />Leigh, ~oore, Hanvey, Brinson, Gross. Withy, Hawks, Eutchins. 15 <br /> <br /> ~r. Johnson stated that he understood the Board of Aldermen had adopted the ordinance proposing <br />to give members of the Police Force a ten day leave cf absence yearly, with pay; and as the season <br />is advancing in which the police could t~ke advantage, fully~ of such an ordinance, he would like <br />to have ~n expressisn from this body as to its willingness to concur in the action of said Board of <br />Aldermen~in anticipation of its adoption of the ordinance at its regular meeting on Suns 14th. <br /> <br /> There being no objection thereto, he then moved that the body now concur m~ith the Board of Al- <br />dermen in its action as stated~ and the motion was adopted° <br /> <br />On motion. ~djourned~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.