|
July 26, 1921
<br />
<br />very feeble. I am of the opinion that he is incapacitated for further active service, owing
<br />to the conditions named above.
<br />
<br /> In order to get the question of retirement on a definite basis, the following is
<br />commended.
<br />
<br /> No employee should be retired, unless disabled in line of duty, with less than twenty-
<br />five years of service.
<br />
<br /> No employee should be reid[ed before seventy years of a~e, unless physically disabled.
<br />The amount of motived pay for twenty five years of service should be one half of the maximum
<br />pay ~!~o~ived daring the last ten years of service. This pay should be increased ~ for each
<br />additional year of service beyond twenty-five, with the understanding that the maximum amount
<br />Amaid shall'not exceed ?5% of the maximum salary paid in the last ten years of service.
<br />
<br /> In case~ employee is disabled by injury, he
<br />for the preceedin~ears for each year of service up to
<br />yond that, 1% additional for each year of service up to
<br />ing ten years.
<br />
<br />should receive 2% of his maximum pay
<br />twenty five years of service, and
<br />75~ of his maximum pay for the preced-
<br />
<br /> Applying these principles to M,v. Hoffler, I recommend that he be given 6~% of his
<br />present rat~ of pay, which' is $?~.~l~er month. '
<br />
<br /> In Mr. Pate's case, his service with the City is uncertain, He is definitel~entitle~
<br />to 26% of his'presen~ pay. -Inview of the fact'that he has probably served at least twenty
<br />five years, and also in view of his advanced N~ I-recommend thathe be givem 50% of his
<br />rate of pay, which is $55.20 per m0~th.
<br />
<br />Yours v~ry t~ly,
<br />
<br />"J. P. Jervey, City Mgr,~
<br />
<br /> On motion, the communication was referred to the Finance Commigtee.
<br /> (PreSent Mr. Hall)
<br /> 5th. Recommending ~doption of the following ordinance, which ha~ been prepared by the
<br />Director of'Public Welfare:
<br />
<br /> An Ordinance .Regarding the Cutting of Weeds in the City Of· Portsmouth. Mr. Brooks moved
<br />that the ordinance be amended by addinE an~emergency clause thereto. Adopted.
<br /> O~motion, the ordinance was placed'On its first reading~
<br />
<br /> 6th, "The work aut~orized by the Council for the
<br />t construction.of earth roads in about in
<br />by the City and of the:~Ji~ng out:of
<br />to proceed with the sale of lots.
<br />
<br /> ek Cemetery consisting of the
<br />~art. of the property owned
<br />O~ieted and I am now ready
<br />
<br /> ' ~T.he cost of the developmen~ of the w~l~t~r~Ct to-d~te, is $~5,000, four-tenths
<br />of this or $3~,OO0 is chs~geable to ~'em~tery;:~/~'.~e devolVe'hr of forty acres will reg~e
<br />four miles of road costing mt lemst $~,OO0, ~e totml ~st of ~velopmemt ~11 be smy, ~5,000.
<br />The cost of s~l~ies, lmBor, mmchinery ~d sBpplies will ~e $6,700 pe~ yemr or the totml m~uml
<br />cost Will Be $~,O00.~ This cmpitmlized mt 5~wili re,ire m fund of $2~,~0. It is estimmted
<br />thmt the cemetery will be fully develop~ in forty ye~s. ~ mvermge income, therefore, for
<br />fortF ye~s will Be one-hmlfo~ the ultimmte'l~comeor 0nly ~,O00~ A deficit of $6OOO for
<br />fo:t~ ye~s must be up from the sale of lots. ~is .11 make the to~l
<br />
<br />develo~ent. To m~e the c~eter~ eelf-~pporting, , the
<br />each,
<br />~I_~herefore reco~end that the COuncil ~y re
<br />for ca~ at $1~0.00 each Orby insta~ents covering a per e
<br />pa~b~ the first mont~ and $!0,~ for each of the remaining sevenleen
<br />
<br /> "Yo~s t~uly,
<br />
<br />#J. P, Jervey,.Oity Manager."
<br />
<br />On motion, the communication'was referred to the Finance Committee.
<br />
<br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS
<br />
<br />The following ordinance, which had been c~vdered ~o lie~ on the table by the Council July
<br />was taken up, read an~ adopted, on motion of N r; Wki~e:
<br />
<br /> AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE BARTER,
<br />FIRE-CRACKER~ WITHIN THE LIN~TS OF THE CITY,
<br />(See Ord~$ance Book).
<br />
<br />SALE, USE, OR: HANDLING OF EXPLOSIVE DEVICES OR
<br />WITHOUT A'SPECIALPERMIT FRO~ THE cITY'MANAGER.
<br />
<br />And by the following vote:
<br />
<br />Ayes-- Brooks, Esleeok, Smith, Hall,
<br /> Hutchins, Cast, White, 7.
<br />
<br /> On motion of Mr, Brooks, the Clerk was instx~acted to have the ordinance published in
<br />a newspapers for .five days.
<br />
<br />ac'' T~e ~tter qf_an a~pEopriatio~ not to ~xceed $30,0OO. for opening Hatton street, on which
<br /> :~lon aaa moon ~ez.erre~ .xrom the-Assr regular meeting until this meeting, was taken up~
<br />
<br />
<br />
|